Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900Keywords:
sociotechnical imaginaries, femtech, Danish media, Female health, Data SprintsAbstract
The digitalization of health promises individual empowerment while raising the threat of collective surveillance. Conceptualizing these threats and promises as sociotechnical imaginaries, we explore how issues of datafied female health are articulated in Danish public discourse. Empirically, we work with a large data set of Danish news media coverage of algorithmic technologies in the past 10 years (2011–2021). We locate coverage of female-oriented health technologies (or femtech) by using the data sprint methodology to track the emergence of such technologies as a topic of public concern. Across the data, we identify two broad sociotechnical imaginaries: one zooming in on individual uses of femtech, the other focusing on the collective benefits of public health initiatives. We conclude that sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech are increasingly entangled in everyday life, making female bodies knowable through algorithms and data. As such, female health becomes subject to instrumental rationality, not lived reality.
References
Agarwal, P. (2021, September 5). "Femtech" is booming-but does it really make healthcare more equal? Prospect. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/science-and-technology/femtech-is-booming-but-does-it-really-make-healthcare-more-equal
Almeling, R. (2020). Guynecology: The missing science of men's reproductive health. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520963986
Arrouas, M. (2017, July 26). Din telefon som prævention? Det kan lad sig gøre. Danske Ida Tin har skabt en potentiel verdenssensation. Zetland. https://www.zetland.dk/historie/sevMQD6D-aOMVBmvY-5883a
Barassi, V. (2017). Babyveillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media and Society, 3(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707188
Baretto, B., Karr, J., Farnham, M., Kohr, S.W., Keymolen, M., Ranadeeve, S.,Pham, K., Cochran, B., Lyles, A., Hakim, J. (2021). Femtech landscape 2021. https://pharmiva.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FemTech-Landscape-2021.pdf
Bauer, S. (2014). From administrative infrastructure to biomedical resource: Danish population registries, the 'Scandinavian laboratory', and the 'epidemiologist's dream'. Science in Context, 27(2), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889714000040
Baumgartner, R. (2021). Precision medicine and digital phenotyping: Digital medicine's way from more data to better health. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110664. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211066452
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Capriccio, M. (2019, November 20). Femtech: Controversal or necessary? https://medium.com/@megan.capriccio/femtech-controversial-or-necessary-a0eb02bc75a6
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. The MIT Press.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Introduction: #TravelingWhileTrans, design justice, and escape from the matrix of domination. Design Justice, 1. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.003.0004
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Dahlman, S., Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2021). Algorithms as organizational figuration: The sociotechnical arrangements of a fintech start-up. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211026702
Del Busso, L., Brottveit, G., Torp Løkkeberg, S., & Gluppe, G. (2022). Women's embodied experiences of using wearable digital self-tracking health technology: A review of the qualitative research literature. Health Care for Women International, 43(12), 1355-1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2021.1884682
Della Bianca, L. (2021). The cyclic self: Menstrual cycle tracking as body politics. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v7i1.34356
Eschler, J., Menking, A., Fox, S., & Backonja, U. (2019). Defining menstrual literacy with the aim of evaluating mobile menstrual tracking applications. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(12), 638-646. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000559
European Commission. (n.d.). Overview. Retrieved August 4, 2022, from https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/overview_en
Folkendt, K. (2019, September 5). So what is femtech, anyways?! https://femtechinsider.com/what-is-femtech/
Geller, S. E., Adams, M. G., & Carnes, M. (2006). Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials. Journal of Women's Health, 15(10), 1123-1131. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.15.1123
Geller, S. E., Koch, A., Pellettieri, B., & Carnes, M. (2011). Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress? Journal of Women's Health, 20(3), 315-320.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2469
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Goodhill, O. (2019, April 3). Why femtech is a sexist category. https://qz.com/1586815/why-femtech-is-a-sexist-category/
Grenfell, P., Tilouche, N., Shawe, J., & French, R. S. (2021). Fertility and digital technology: Narratives of using smartphone app 'Natural Cycles' while trying to conceive. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(1), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13199
Guay, R., & Birch, K. (2022). A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data in the USA and EU (2008-2016). Big Data & Society, 9(2), 20539517221112925. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221112925
Gulbrandsen, I. T., Plesner, U., & Raviola, E. (2020). New media and strategy research: Towards a relational agency approach. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12213
Hamper, J. (2020). 'Catching ovulation': Exploring women's use of fertility tracking apps as a reproductive technology. Body & Society, 26(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X19898259
Hansen, S. S. (2022). Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956-2021. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004
Hendl, T., & Jansky, B. (2022). Tales of self-empowerment through digital health technologies: A closer look at 'Femtech'. Review of Social Economy, 80(1), 29-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.2018027
Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
Hockenhull, M., & Cohn, M. L. (2021). Hot air and corporate sociotechnical imaginaries: Performing and translating digital futures in the Danish tech scene. New Media & Society, 23(2), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929319
Hoeyer. K, (2018). Lost and found: Relocating the individual in the age of intensified data sourcing in European healthcare. In B. van Beers, S. Sterckx, & D. Dickenson (Eds.), Personalised medicine, individual choice and the common good (pp. 133-154). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108590600.007
Hoeyer, K. (2019). Data as promise: Reconfiguring Danish public health through personalized medicine. Social Studies of Science, 49(4), 531-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719858697
Hoeyer, K., Bauer, S., & Pickersgill, M. (2019). Datafication and accountability in public health: Introduction to a special issue. Social Studies of Science, 49(4), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051677019860202
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff, & S.H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1-33). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
Krishnamurti, T., Talabi, M. B., Callegari, L. S., Kazmerski, T. M., & Borrero, S. (2022). A framework for femtech: Guiding principles for developing digital reproductive health tools in the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e36338. https://doi.org/10.2196/36338
Kuntsman, A., Miyake, E., & Martin, S. (2019). Re-thinking digital health: Data, appisation and the (im)possibility of 'opting out'. Digital Health, 5, 205520761988067. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619880671
Lundgren, A. S., Lindberg, J., & Carlsson, E. (2021). 'Within the hour' and 'wherever you are': Exploring the promises of digital healthcare apps. Journal of Digital Social Research, 3(3), 32-59. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i3.77
Lupton, D. (2014). Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1344-1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12226
Lupton, D. (2015a). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
Lupton, D. (2015b). Donna Haraway: The digital cyborg assemblage and the new digital health technologies. In F. Collyer (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health, illness and medicine (pp. 567-581). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137355621_36
Lupton, D. (2018). Digital health: Critical and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648835
Marshall, B. 2002. 'Hard science': Gender constructions of sexual dysfunction in the 'viagra age'. Sexualities, 5(2), 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460702005002001
McQuillan, L. (2022). Americans are being urged to delete period tracking apps: Should Canadians do the same? CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/period-tracker-apps-data-privacy-1.6510029.
Mees-Buss, J., Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2022). From templates to heuristics: How and why to move beyond the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120967716
Mishra, P., & Suresh, Y. (2021). Datafied body projects in India: Femtech and the rise of reproductive surveillance in the digital era. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 27(4), 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2021.2002010
Munk, A. K., Jacomy, M., Jensen, T. E., & Raalund, S. (2023). How do algorithms make the news? Building a datascape to explore ten years of AI coverage in the Danish media 2011-2021. Social Science Research Network.
Murray, E., Hekler, E. B., Andersson, G., Collins, L. M., Doherty, A., Hollis, C., Rivera, D. E., West, R., & Wyatt, J. C. (2016). Evaluating digital health interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(5), 843-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams Press.
Petersen, M. L., Mahnke, M. S., & Nielsen, M. (2022). Practices of self-tracking in infertility treatment: How bodily awareness is constituted. Qualitative Health Communication, 1(2), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.v1i2.130468
Petrakaki, D., Hilberg, E., & Waring, J. (2021). The cultivation of digital health citizenship. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 270, 113675-113675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.1136
Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body and Society, 23(1), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16660366
Sartori, L., & Bocca, G. (2022). Minding the gap(s): Public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries. AI & SOCIETY, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1
Sismondo, S. (2020). Sociotechnical imaginaries: An accidental themed issue. Social Studies of Science, 50(4), 505-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720944753
Slawson, N. (2019). 'Women have been woefully neglected': Does medical science have a gender problem? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/dec/18/women-have-been-woefully-neglected-does-medical-science-have-a-gender-problem
Sundhed.dk. (2022). Steps fertilitetsværktøj. https://www.sundhed.dk/borger/guides/apps-i-sundhedsvaesenet/apps-fra-sundhedsvaesenet-borger/steps-app/
Thompson, C (2005) Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. MIT Press.
Thygesen, L. C., & Ersbøll, A. K. (2011). Danish population-based registers for public health and health-related welfare research: Introduction to the supplement. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(Suppl. 7), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811409654
Tonti, L. (2020). Femtech fatale: Access to femtech in public health insurance systems. European Journal of Public Health, 30(5), 165-1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.1032
Triantafyllidis, A. K., & Tsanas, A. (2019). Applications of machine learning in real-life digital health interventions: Review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e12286. https://doi.org/10.2196/12286
Tupasela, A. (2017) Populations as brands in medical research: Placing genes on the global genetic atlas. BioSocieties, 12(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0029-9
Vechery, A. (2021). Why is women's health still so under-researched? Fortune. https://fortune.com/2021/03/09/womens-health-research-fda-trials/
Venturini, T., Munk, A. K., & Meunier, A. (2018). Data-sprinting: A public approach to digital research. In C. Lury, R. Fensham, P. Clough, A. Heller-Nicholas, S. Lammes, A. Last, M. Michael, & E. Uprichard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of interdisciplinary research methods (pp. 158-163). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714523-24
Venturini, T., & Munk, A. K. (2022). Controversy mapping: A field guide. Polity Press.
Wachter-Boettcher, S. (2017). Technically wrong: Sexist apps, biased algorithms, and other threats of toxic tech. WW Norton & Company.
Weiss, S. (2018, April 16). This new industry wants to destigmatize menstrual & sexual health. Bustle. https://www.bustle.com/p/what-is-femtech-5-things-to-know-about-the-new-industry-8792289
Wiederhold, B. K. (2021). Femtech: Digital help for women's health care across the life span. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(11), 697-698. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.29230.editorial
WHO. (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/344249
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 author and journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
