Children’s digital friendship practices during the first Covid-19 lockdown


  • Stine Liv Johansen Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Communication and Culture
  • Thomas Enemark Lundtofte



young children, adolescents, digital media, friendship, Covid-19, agency, affordance


During the Covid-19 pandemic, digital technologies have come to the forefront of mostpeople’s social, professional, and educational lives, and children have, like everyone else, depended on digital media for remote schooling as well as informal communication with their peers. This article presents results from a qualitative interview study among 20 Danish children, aged 3–12, and their parents during the spring and summer of 2020. As would be expected, age predicted a certain level of proficiency with, and access to, digital media technologies. However, children across the age spectrum of our sample relied on adult facilitation of digital practices in similar ways during a time where these were foregrounded in unforeseen ways. We discuss these findings in relation to a triadic theoretical framework of distributed agency, dynamic affordances, and access-oriented aspects of children’s practices with communication technology.


boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Bucher, T. (2018). IF… THEN: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.

Christensen, P. M., & James, A. (2017). Research with children: Perspectives and practices (3rd. ed.). Routledge.

Corsaro, W. A. (2003). We’re friends, right?: Inside kids’ culture. Joseph Henry Press.

Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: Adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of adolescence, 35(6), 1527–1536.

Davis, K. (2013). Young people’s digital lives: The impact of interpersonal relationships and digital media use on adolescents’ sense of identity. Computers in human behavior, 29(6), 2281–2293.

Drotner, K., Frau-Meigs, D., Kotilainen, S., & Uusitalo, N. (2017). The double bind of media and information literacy: a critical view on public policy discourses about MIL. In D. Frau-Meigs, I. Velez, & J. F. Michel (Eds.), Public policies in media and information literacy in Europe: Cross-country comparisons (pp. 269–283). Routledge.

Flewitt, R. (2013). Interviews. In A. Clark, R. Flewitt, M. Hammersley, & M. Robb (Eds.), Understanding research with children and young people (pp. 136–53). Sage.

Flewitt, R., & Clark, A. (2020). Porous boundaries: Reconceptualising the home literacy environment as adigitally networked space for 0 3 year olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 447–471.

Gubar, M. (2013). Risky business: Talking about children in children’s literature criticism. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38(4), 450–457.

Gulløv, E. (1999). Betydningsdannelse blandt børn (1. udg.). Gyldendal

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.). Culture, media, language. Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128–138). Routledge.

Hynan, A., Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2014). ‘Happy and excited’: Perceptions of using digital technology and social media by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(2), 175–186.

Islam, N., Jdanov, D. A., Shkolnikov, V. M., Khunti, K., Kawachi, I., White, M., Lewington, S., & Lacey, B. (2021). Effects of Covid-19 pandemic on life expectancy and premature mortality in 2020: Time series analysis in 37 countries. BMJ, 375, e066768.

Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr, B. & Yardi, S. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. MIT Press.

James, C., Davis, K., Charmaraman, L., Konrath, S., Slovak, P., Weinstein, E., & Yarosh, L. (2017). Digital Life and Youth Well-being, Social Connectedness, Empathy, and Narcissism. Pediatrics (Evanston), 140(Suppl 2), S71-S75.

Johansen, S. L. (2018). Everyday media play: Children’s playful media practices. Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 4(1), 1–10.

Johansen, S.L. & Lundtofte, T.E. (2020). KIDS DIGITAL LIVES IN COVID-19 TIMES - DIGITAL PRACTICES, SAFETY AND WELL-BEING OF THE 6-12 YEARS OLD A qualitative study - National report – DENMARK. Working Paper.

Kofoed, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2016). A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday, 21(11).

Livingstone, S. M., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York University Press.

Mascheroni, G., Siibak, A. (2021). Datafied Childhoods. New York, United States of America: Peter Lang Verlag.

Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society.

Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

Orben, A. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(4), 407–414.

Peterson, B. L. (2017). Thematic analysis/interpretive thematic analysis. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons.

Prensky, M. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Prior, J. (2016). The use of semi-structured interviews with young children. In J. Prior, & J. V. Herwegen (Eds.), Practical research with children (pp. 109–126). Routledge.

Rammert, W. (2015). Where the action is: Distributed agency between humans, machines, and programs. In U. Seifert, J. H. Kim, & A. Moore (Eds.), (1st ed.) (pp. 62–91). transcript Verlag.

Reich, S. M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Espinoza, G. (2012). Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 356–368.

Shaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 592–602.

Sherman, L. E., Michikyan, M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(2), Article 3.

Spyrou, S. (2018). Disclosing childhoods: Research and knowledge production for critical childhood studies. Palgrave.

Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1892–1913.

Watson, A., & Lupton, D. (2022). Remote fieldwork in homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Video-call ethnography and map drawing methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21.

Willett, R. (2015). ‘Friending someone means just adding them to your friends list, not much else’: Children’s casual practices in virtual world games. Convergence, 23(3), 325–340.

Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2017). Are the qualities of adolescents’ offline friendships present in digital interactions? Adolescent Research Review, 3(3), 339–355.




How to Cite

Johansen, S. L., & Enemark Lundtofte, T. (2023). Children’s digital friendship practices during the first Covid-19 lockdown. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 38(73), 171–189.