Making (female) health care work matter
The performative publics of #systemrelevant during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128451Keywords:
performative publics, media practice, health care work, berlin hospital movement, network analysis, digital ethnographyAbstract
Over the last two years, digital media have contributed significantly to increasing the visibility of those who are outstandingly challenged by the pandemic. In Germany, the Twitter hashtag #systemrelevant [systemically relevant] initiated a public debate on values and working conditions. Applying the practice-theory-based concept of performative publics, we analyze the formation of this specific public with a special focus on its gendered structure. Results of our mixed-methods approach show how health care work has become the dominant issue of #systemrelevant. Civil society actors and engaged health care workers set the agenda, and journalism primarily responds to these voices. Although care work is performed predominantly by women, most of the attention online is given to men. However, on the level of tweets and linked content, the discourse in #systemrelevant counteracts stereotypical images of women in health care. Overall, the ethnographic data on the most significant collective actor show a continuous tension between symbolic recognition and their struggle for improving working conditions.
References
Aaldering, L., & Van Der Pas, D. J. (2020). Political leadership in the media: Gender bias in leader stereotypes during campaign and routine times. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795
Araújo, R., Lopes, F., Magalhães, O., & Cerqueira, C. (2022). Muted voices: The underrepresentation of women in COVID-19 news in Portugal. Social Sciences, 11(5), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050210
Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
Balaam, M. (2017). Virtuous, invisible and unconcerned: Nurses, nursing and the media [Doctoral dissertation, Queen Margaret University, Scotland]. Queen Margaret University Research Repositories. https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/7391/2616.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for explorating and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference, 3(1), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Behruzi, D. (2021). Wieso gehen, wenn man was verändern kann? Krankenhauspflege zwischen Flucht und kollektivem Widerstand. In N. Mayer-Ahuja, & O. Nachtwey (Eds.), Verkannte Leistungsträger:innen. Berichte aus der Klassengesellschaft (pp. 141–164). Suhrkamp.
Birkbak, A. (2013, May). From networked publics to issue publics: Reconsidering the public / private distinction in web science. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference on—WebSci ’13, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464489
Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112
Brøgger, M. N., Nielbo, K. L., & Fage-Butler, A. (2021). #Detkuhaværetmig: How Twitter enabled the expression and propagation and solidarity among healthcare professionals. Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7146/TJCP.V8I1.123040
boyd, d. m. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Political Representation on Web 2.0: Concepts, Methods and Empirical Data. ECPR General Conference University of Iceland, Reykjavik 25-27 August 2011. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/1/The_Use_of_Twitter_Hashtags_in_the_Formation_of_Ad_Hoc_Publics_%28final%29.pdf
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T.
Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828274
Chatzidakis, A., Hakim, J., Littler, J., Rottenberg, C., & Segal, L. (2020). From carewashing to radical care: Thediscursive explosions of care during Covid-19. Feminist Media Studies, 20(6), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1781435
Clark-Parsons, R. (2019). “I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies, 21(3), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797
Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2006). Public connection through media consumption: Between oversocialization and de-socialization? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206292342
Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, 19(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688550
Drüeke, R., & Zobl, E. (2016). Online feminist protest against sexism: The German-language hashtag# aufschrei. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797
Einboden, R. (2020). SuperNurse? Troubling the hero discourse in COVID times. Health, 24(4), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320934280
Fuß, S., & Karbach, U. (2014). Grundlagen der Transkription: Eine praktische Einführung. Opladen, Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Florell, M. C. (2021). Concept analysis of nursing activism. Nursing Forum, 56(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12502
Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capitalism and care. New Left Review, 100. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii100/articles/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care
Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache. (2020, November 30). GfdS wählt »Corona-Pandemie« zum Wort des Jahres 2020 [Press release]. https://gfds.de/wort-des-jahres-2020-1/
Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. R. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 53–74). SAGE. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526441867.n4
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). MIT Press.
Gordon, S. (2005). Nursing against the odds: How health care cost cutting, media stereotypes, and medical hubris undermine nurses and patient care. Cornell University Press.
Grist, H., & Jennings, R. (2020). Carers, care homes and the British media: Time to care. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35768-9
Hatton, E. (2017). Mechanisms of invisibility: Rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work, Employment and Society, 31(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016674894
Isfort, M. (2013). Der Pflegeberuf im Spiegel der Öffentlichkeit. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, 56, 1081–1087.
Jones, L. (2020). Women’s representation and voice in media coverage of the coronavirus crisis. Global Institute for Women’s Leadership. Kings College London. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/giwl/assets/covid-media-analysis.pdf
Laurenz, N. (2021, June 6). Der Beziehungspfleger. SPIEGEL online. https://www.spiegel.de/psychologie/ ricardo-lange-intensivpfleger-waehrend-corona-was-denkt-er-ueber-den-ploetzlichen-ruhm-ab88834ac-370f-45df-9cb3-69be5ee45100
Lünenborg, M., & Maier, T. (2015). ‘Power politician’ or ‘fighting bureaucrat’: Gender and power in German political coverage. Media Culture & Society, 37(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714557979
Lünenborg, M., & Raetzsch, C. (2018). From public sphere to performative publics: Developing media practice as an analytic model. In S. Foellmer, M. Lünenborg, & C. Raetzsch (Eds.), Media practices, social movements, and performativity: Transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 13–35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315455938
Lünenborg, M., Raetzsch, C., Reißmann, W., & Siemon, M. (2020). Media Practice in performativen Öffentlichkeiten: Für eine praxistheoretische Positionierung der Journalismusforschung. In J. Schützeneder, K. Meier, & N. Springer (Eds.), Neujustierung der Journalistik/Journalismusforschung in der digitalen Gesellschaft: Proceedings zur Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Journalistik/Journalismusforschung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 2019 (pp. 34–51). DGPuK. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.70817
Mason, D. J., Glickstein, B., Nixon, L., Westphaln, K., Han, S., & Acquaviva, K. (2018). The Woodhull study revisited: Nurses’ representation in health news media 2018. Center for Health Policy & Media Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12429
Miller, W. R., Malloy, C., Mravec, M., Sposato, M. F., & Groves, D. (2022). Nursing in the spotlight: Talk about nurses and the nursing profession on Twitter during the early Covid-19 pandemic. Nursing Outlook, 70(4), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2022.02.009
Morley, D. (2008). For a materialist, non–media-centric media studies. Television & New Media, 10(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476408327173
Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ). (2020, December 8). Das Deutschschweizer Wort des Jahres 2020 ist «systemrelevant». https://www.nzz.ch/panorama/das-deutschschweizer-wort-des-jahres-2020-ist-systemrelevant-ld.1590864
Ojo, A., Guntuku, S. C., Zheng, M., Beidas, R. S., & Ranney, M. L. (2021). How health care workers wield influence through Twitter hashtags: Retrospective cross-sectional study of the gun violence and COVID-19 public health crises. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 7(1), e24562. https://doi.org/10.2196/24562
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Picone, I., Kleut, J., Pavlícková, T., Romic, B., Møller Hartley, J., & De Ridder, S. (2019). Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audience practices with everyday agency. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010–2028. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837569
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114
Prommer, E., & Stüwe, J. (2020). Geschlechterverteilung in der Corona-Berichterstattung im deutschen Fernsehen: Studie im Auftrag der MaLisa Stiftung. MaLisa Stiftung. https://malisastiftung.org/wp-content/uploads/Studie_MaLisa_Geschlechterverteilung_in_der_Corona_Berichterstattung.pdf
Prommer, E., Stüwe, J., & Wegner, J. (2021). Sichtbarkeit und Vielfalt. Fortschrittsstudie zur audiovisuellen Diversität. Preprint. https://malisastiftung.org/wp-content/uploads/SICHTBARKEIT_UND_VIELFALT_Prommer_Stuewe_Wegner_2021.pdf
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org/index.html
Raetzsch, C., & Lünenborg, M. (2020). Anchoring practices for public connection: Media practice and its challenges for journalism studies. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2868–2886. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11213/3100
Rambukkana, N. (2015). #Introduction: Hashtags as technosocial events. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 1–10). Peter Lang.
Reißmann, W., Siemon, M., Lünenborg, M., & Raetzsch, C. (2022). Praxisprofile als mixed-methods Ansatz zur Analyse performativer Öffentlichkeiten: Vorschlag für eine relationale Journalismusforschung. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.01.3057
Ross, K., Boyle, K., Carter, C., & Ging, D. (2018). Women, men and news. Journalism Studies, 19(6), 824–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1222884
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
Skog, F., & Lundström, R. (2022). Heroes, victims, and villains in news media narratives about COVID-19. Analysing moralising discourse in Swedish newspaper reporting during the spring of 2020. Social Science & Medicine, 294(2022), 114718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114718.
Sobieraj, S. (2018). Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1700–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
Statista. (2021). Verteilung sozialversicherungspflichtig Beschäftigter in der Pflege in Deutschland nach Pflegeart und Geschlecht im Jahr 2020. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1029877/umfrage/verteilung-von-pflegekraefte-in-deutschland-nach-pflegeart-und-geschlecht/
Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Repositioning news and public connection in everyday life: A user-oriented perspective on inclusiveness, engagement, relevance, and constructiveness. Media, Culture & Society, 39(6), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716679034
The Care Collective. (2020). The care manifesto: The politics of interdependence. Verso.
Tronto, J. (2013). Caring Democracy. Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York University Press.
Villa Braslavsky, P.-I. (2020). Corona-Krise meets Care-Krise—Ist das systemrelevant? Leviathan, 48(3), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-0425-2020-3-433
Vinken, B. (2001). Die deutsche Mutter: Der lange Schatten eines Mythos. Piper.
Wilhelm, C. (2021). Gendered (in)visibility in digital media contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 21(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 author and journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
