Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices
Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125300Keywords:
Gender, Image-based abuse, sexuality, digital media, masculinity, young peopleAbstract
Sexualized images of the bodies of girls and young women – in some cases taken without the knowledge of those depicted, in other cases exchanged as part of erotic or romantic interactions – sometimes turn up in closed groups on social media and on websites and other online platforms. In their efforts to mark and prove masculinity, the (presumably) male participants in these fora share, trade, and evaluate such imagery. The young women depicted are generally commented upon in condescending ways. Based on a combination of digital ethnography and analogue fieldwork and interviews at a vocational school in Denmark, this article explores how boys and young men use sexualized female bodies to negotiate boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning, and intimacy. Through new materialist and poststructuralist perspectives, we attend to the entanglements of social and technological phenomena enacting these practices.
References
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 26(3), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665840
Amundsen, R. (2019). “Kind of like making porn of yourself”: Understanding sexting through pornography. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1494617
Attwood, F. (2009). Mainstreaming sex: The sexualization of western culture. IB Tauris.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Barad, K. (2008). Living in a posthumanist material world: Lessons from Schrödingers cat. In A. Smelik, & N. Lykke (Eds.), Bits of life: Feminism at the intersections of media, bioscience, and technology (pp. 165–176). University of Washington Press.
Bates, S. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1557085116654565
Bell, D. (2006). Bodies, technologies, spaces: On ‘dogging’. Sexualities, 9(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706068040
Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1086/448875
boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In A. M. J. Burgess, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066
Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08329699
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing, 1990–1999. AltaMira Press.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). When does a body become a body? In E. de Freitas, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom (pp. 14–37). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600378.004
Dobson, A. S. (2011). Hetero-sexy representation by young women on MySpace: The politics of performing an ‘objectified’ self. Outskirts (Nedlands), 25. https://www.outskirts.arts.uwa.edu.au/volumes/volume-25/amy-shields-dobson
Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06287761
Franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff , J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839
Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898
Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
Gottzé n, L., Mellströ m, U., & Shefer, T. (2020). Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165165
Hall, M., & Hearn, J. (2019). Revenge pornography and manhood acts: A discourse analysis of perpetrators’ accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1417117
Handyside, S., & Ringrose, J. (2017). Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and aff ect. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 347–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1280384
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873106
Harder, S. K., Bentzen, J. J. V., Demant, J. J., & Maxwell, C. (2020). Tailored pornography. Mediekultur, 36(67), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i67.115099
Harvey, L., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sexting, ratings and (mis)recognition: Teen boys performing classed and racialized masculinities in digitally networked publics. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & R. D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualization (pp. 352–367). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353399_22
Hasinoff , A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy and consent. University of Illinois Press.
Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: Online distribution channels and illicit communities of support. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 1932–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077801219863881
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hine, C., Kendall, L., & boyd, d. (2009). Question one: How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In A. Markham, & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–32). Sage.
Hunehäll, K. B., & Odenbring, Y. (2020). They don’t even think about what the girl might think about it’: Students’ views on sexting, gender inequalities and power relations in school. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1825217
Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0959354309359965
Jacobs, K. (2004). Pornography in small places and other spaces. Cultural Studies, 18(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000181610
Jamieson, L. (2005). Boundaries of intimacy. In L. McKie, & S. Cunningham-Burley (Eds.), Families in society: Boundaries and relationships (pp. 189–206). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861346438.001.0001
Jane, E. A. (2014). ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 28(4), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
Johansen, K. B. H., Pedersen, B. M., & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2018). Visual gossiping: Non-consensual ‘nude’ sharing among young people in Denmark. Culture, health & sexuality, 21(9), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1534140
Jørgensen, K. E., & Demant, J. (2021). Shame, shaming and economy: A theory of image-based sexual abuse within different online sharing environments. First Monday, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i4.11670
Langlois, G., & Slane, A. (2017). Economies of reputation: The case of revenge porn. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2016.1273534
Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offl ine spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303140
Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. Free Press.
Macleod, P. J. (2020). How feminists pick porn: Troubling the link between ‘authenticity’ and production ethics. Sexualities, 24(4), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720936475
Mandau, M. B. H. (2020). Homosocial positionings and ambivalent participation: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ non-consensual sharing and viewing of privately produced sexual images. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communications Research, 36(67), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i67.113976
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931
Marcus, G. (1999). What is at stake–and is not–in the idea and practice of multi-sited ethnography. Canberra Anthropology, 22(2), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03149099909508344
Markham, A. (2013). Fieldwork in social media: What would Malinowski do? Qualitative Communication Research, 2(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2013.2.4.434
Markham, A., & Baym, N. (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Sage.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Markham, A., & Gammelby, A. K. L. (2018). Moving through digital flows: An epistemological and practical approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (1st ed.) (pp. 451–465). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n29
Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0306312715602073
Massanari, A. (2017). Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444815608807
Matthews, C. R. (2016). The tyrrany of the male preserve. Gender & Society, 30(2), 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215620557
Matthews, C. R., & Channon, A. (2020). Th e‘male preserve’ thesis, sporting culture, and men’s power. In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, T. Shefer, & M. Grimbeek (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165165
McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture: Sex, media and the democratisation of desire. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469378
Mortensen, S. U. (2020). Defying shame: Shame-relations in digital sexual assaults. Mediekultur: Journal of media and communication research, 36(67), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i67.113960
Mortensen, S. U. (2021). The rhythms of shame in digital sexual assault: Rhythmic resistance and the repeated assault. First Monday, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i4.11660
Naezer, M., & Ringrose, J. (2019). Adventure, intimacy, identity, and knowledge: Exploring how social media are shaping and transforming youth sexuality. In S. Lamb, & J. Gilbert (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sexual development: Childhood and adolescence (pp. 419–438). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108116121
Paasonen, S. (2011). Carnal resonance: Affect and online pornography. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016315.001.0001
Paasonen, S., Nikune, K., & Saarenmaa, L. (2007). Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture. Berg.
Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473917057
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1329878X1214500114
Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2014). Blurred lines? Responding to ‘sexting’ and gender-based violence among young people. Children Australia, 39(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2014.9
Powell, A., Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2018). Image-based sexual abuse. In W. S. DeKeseredy, & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622040
Rasmussen, P., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2020). Traveling imagery: Young people’s spreading of sexualized digital imagery. Journal of Media and Communications Studies, 36(67), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i67.113983
Ravn, S., Coffey, J., & Roberts, S. (2019). The currency of images: Risk, value and gendered power dynamics in young men’s accounts of sexting. Feminist Media Studies, 21(2) 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1642229
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies, relfies and phallic tagging: Posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1185686
Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). Boobs, back-off , six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens’ sexting images. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1022952
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853
Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2723–2739. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444815604133
Shaheen, S. (2014). Sexting and cyberbullying: Defining the line for digitally empowered kids. Cambridge University Press.
Slater, D. (1998). Trading sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and authenticity on the internet. Body & Society, 4(4), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x98004004005
Sundén, J. (2012). Desires at play: On closeness and epistemological uncertainty. Games and Culture, 7(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412012451124
Søndergaard, D. M. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110111910
Søndergaard, D. M. (2013). Virtual materiality, potentiality and subjectivity: How do we conceptualize real-virtual interaction embodied and enacted in computer gaming, imagination and night dreams? Subjectivity, 6(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.23
Søndergaard, D. M. (2019). Psychology, ethics, and new materialist thinking—Using a study of sexualized digital practices as an example. Human Arenas, 2(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00064-y
Tiidenberg, K., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2015). Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1357034X15592465
Tiidenberg, K., & Van der Nagel, E. (2020). Sex and social media. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781839094064
Uhl, C. A., Rhyner, K. J., Terrance, C. A., & Lugo, N. R. (2018). An examination of nonconsensual pornography websites. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720225
van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday, 20(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i3.5615
van Doorn, N. (2010). The ties that bind: The networked performance of gender, sexuality, and friendship on Myspace. New Media & Society, 12(4), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342766
van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). A nuanced account: Why do individuals engage in sexting? In M. Walrave, J. van Ouytsel, K. Ponnet, & J. R. Temple (Eds.), Sexting: Motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation (pp. 39–51). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71882-8_3
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State University Press.
Warfield, K. (2016). Making the cut: An agential realist examination of selfies and touch. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116641706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641706
Warfield, K., Abidin, C., & Cambre, C. (2020). Mediated interfaces: The body on social media. Bloomsbury Academic.
Wilkinson, E. (2017). The diverse economies of online pornography: From paranoid readings to post-capitalist futures. Sexualities, 20(8), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716675141
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-01-03 (2)
- 2021-12-22 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
