Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices

Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy




Gender, Image-based abuse, sexuality, digital media, masculinity, young people


Sexualized images of the bodies of girls and young women – in some cases taken without the knowledge of those depicted, in other cases exchanged as part of erotic or romantic interactions – sometimes turn up in closed groups on social media and on websites and other online platforms. In their efforts to mark and prove masculinity, the (presumably) male participants in these fora share, trade, and evaluate such imagery. The young women depicted are generally commented upon in condescending ways. Based on a combination of digital ethnography and analogue fieldwork and interviews at a vocational school in Denmark, this article explores how boys and young men use sexualized female bodies to negotiate boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning, and intimacy. Through new materialist and poststructuralist perspectives, we attend to the entanglements of social and technological phenomena enacting these practices.


Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 26(3), 463–473.

Amundsen, R. (2019). “Kind of like making porn of yourself”: Understanding sexting through pornography. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4), 479–494.

Attwood, F. (2009). Mainstreaming sex: The sexualization of western culture. IB Tauris.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Barad, K. (2008). Living in a posthumanist material world: Lessons from Schrödingers cat. In A. Smelik, & N. Lykke (Eds.), Bits of life: Feminism at the intersections of media, bioscience, and technology (pp. 165–176). University of Washington Press.

Bates, S. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42.

Bell, D. (2006). Bodies, technologies, spaces: On ‘dogging’. Sexualities, 9(4), 387–407.

Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.

boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.

Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In A. M. J. Burgess, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE publications.

Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. Routledge.

Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing, 1990–1999. AltaMira Press.

de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). When does a body become a body? In E. de Freitas, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom (pp. 14–37). Cambridge University Press.

Dobson, A. S. (2011). Hetero-sexy representation by young women on MySpace: The politics of performing an ‘objectified’ self. Outskirts (Nedlands), 25.

Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 339–359.

Franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0.

Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff , J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84.

Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.

Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657.

Gottzé n, L., Mellströ m, U., & Shefer, T. (2020). Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies. Routledge.

Hall, M., & Hearn, J. (2019). Revenge pornography and manhood acts: A discourse analysis of perpetrators’ accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 158–170.

Handyside, S., & Ringrose, J. (2017). Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and aff ect. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 347–314.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.

Harder, S. K., Bentzen, J. J. V., Demant, J. J., & Maxwell, C. (2020). Tailored pornography. Mediekultur, 36(67), 16–36.

Harvey, L., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sexting, ratings and (mis)recognition: Teen boys performing classed and racialized masculinities in digitally networked publics. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & R. D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualization (pp. 352–367). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hasinoff , A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy and consent. University of Illinois Press.

Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: Online distribution channels and illicit communities of support. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 1932–1955.

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hine, C., Kendall, L., & boyd, d. (2009). Question one: How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In A. Markham, & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–32). Sage.

Hunehäll, K. B., & Odenbring, Y. (2020). They don’t even think about what the girl might think about it’: Students’ views on sexting, gender inequalities and power relations in school. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(1), 91–101.

Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354.

Jacobs, K. (2004). Pornography in small places and other spaces. Cultural Studies, 18(1), 67–83.

Jamieson, L. (2005). Boundaries of intimacy. In L. McKie, & S. Cunningham-Burley (Eds.), Families in society: Boundaries and relationships (pp. 189–206). Policy Press.

Jane, E. A. (2014). ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 28(4), 558–570.

Johansen, K. B. H., Pedersen, B. M., & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2018). Visual gossiping: Non-consensual ‘nude’ sharing among young people in Denmark. Culture, health & sexuality, 21(9), 1029–1044.

Jørgensen, K. E., & Demant, J. (2021). Shame, shaming and economy: A theory of image-based sexual abuse within different online sharing environments. First Monday, 26(4).

Langlois, G., & Slane, A. (2017). Economies of reputation: The case of revenge porn. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(2), 120–138.

Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offl ine spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211–240.

Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. Free Press.

Macleod, P. J. (2020). How feminists pick porn: Troubling the link between ‘authenticity’ and production ethics. Sexualities, 24(4), 673–693.

Mandau, M. B. H. (2020). Homosocial positionings and ambivalent participation: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ non-consensual sharing and viewing of privately produced sexual images. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communications Research, 36(67), 55–75.

Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117.

Marcus, G. (1999). What is at stake–and is not–in the idea and practice of multi-sited ethnography. Canberra Anthropology, 22(2), 6–14.

Markham, A. (2013). Fieldwork in social media: What would Malinowski do? Qualitative Communication Research, 2(4), 434–446.

Markham, A., & Baym, N. (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Sage.

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0).

Markham, A., & Gammelby, A. K. L. (2018). Moving through digital flows: An epistemological and practical approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (1st ed.) (pp. 451–465). Sage.

Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641.

Massanari, A. (2017). Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346.

Matthews, C. R. (2016). The tyrrany of the male preserve. Gender & Society, 30(2), 312–333.

Matthews, C. R., & Channon, A. (2020). Th e‘male preserve’ thesis, sporting culture, and men’s power. In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, T. Shefer, & M. Grimbeek (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies (1st ed.). Routledge.

McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture: Sex, media and the democratisation of desire. Routledge.

Mortensen, S. U. (2020). Defying shame: Shame-relations in digital sexual assaults. Mediekultur: Journal of media and communication research, 36(67), 100–120.

Mortensen, S. U. (2021). The rhythms of shame in digital sexual assault: Rhythmic resistance and the repeated assault. First Monday, 26(4).

Naezer, M., & Ringrose, J. (2019). Adventure, intimacy, identity, and knowledge: Exploring how social media are shaping and transforming youth sexuality. In S. Lamb, & J. Gilbert (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sexual development: Childhood and adolescence (pp. 419–438). Cambridge University Press.

Paasonen, S. (2011). Carnal resonance: Affect and online pornography. MIT Press.

Paasonen, S., Nikune, K., & Saarenmaa, L. (2007). Pornification: Sex and sexuality in media culture. Berg.

Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). Sage.

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.

Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 145(1), 123–134.

Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2014). Blurred lines? Responding to ‘sexting’ and gender-based violence among young people. Children Australia, 39(2), 119–124.

Powell, A., Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2018). Image-based sexual abuse. In W. S. DeKeseredy, & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Rasmussen, P., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2020). Traveling imagery: Young people’s spreading of sexualized digital imagery. Journal of Media and Communications Studies, 36(67), 76–99.

Ravn, S., Coffey, J., & Roberts, S. (2019). The currency of images: Risk, value and gendered power dynamics in young men’s accounts of sexting. Feminist Media Studies, 21(2) 315–331.

Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies, relfies and phallic tagging: Posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1066–1079.

Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). Boobs, back-off , six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens’ sexting images. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29(2), 205–217.

Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.

Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2723–2739.

Shaheen, S. (2014). Sexting and cyberbullying: Defining the line for digitally empowered kids. Cambridge University Press.

Slater, D. (1998). Trading sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and authenticity on the internet. Body & Society, 4(4), 91–117.

Sundén, J. (2012). Desires at play: On closeness and epistemological uncertainty. Games and Culture, 7(2), 164–184.

Søndergaard, D. M. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 187–204.

Søndergaard, D. M. (2013). Virtual materiality, potentiality and subjectivity: How do we conceptualize real-virtual interaction embodied and enacted in computer gaming, imagination and night dreams? Subjectivity, 6(1), 55–78.

Søndergaard, D. M. (2019). Psychology, ethics, and new materialist thinking—Using a study of sexualized digital practices as an example. Human Arenas, 2(4), 489–498.

Tiidenberg, K., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2015). Selfies, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77–102.

Tiidenberg, K., & Van der Nagel, E. (2020). Sex and social media. Emerald Publishing.

Uhl, C. A., Rhyner, K. J., Terrance, C. A., & Lugo, N. R. (2018). An examination of nonconsensual pornography websites. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 50–68.

van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday, 20(3), 40.

van Doorn, N. (2010). The ties that bind: The networked performance of gender, sexuality, and friendship on Myspace. New Media & Society, 12(4), 583–602.

van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446–470.

Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). A nuanced account: Why do individuals engage in sexting? In M. Walrave, J. van Ouytsel, K. Ponnet, & J. R. Temple (Eds.), Sexting: Motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation (pp. 39–51). Palgrave Macmillan.

Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State University Press.

Warfield, K. (2016). Making the cut: An agential realist examination of selfies and touch. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 2056305116641706.

Warfield, K., Abidin, C., & Cambre, C. (2020). Mediated interfaces: The body on social media. Bloomsbury Academic.

Wilkinson, E. (2017). The diverse economies of online pornography: From paranoid readings to post-capitalist futures. Sexualities, 20(8), 981–998.



2021-12-22 — Updated on 2022-01-03


How to Cite

Rasmussen, P. K. B., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2022). Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 37(71), 073–097. (Original work published December 22, 2021)



Articles: Theme section