Period-tracking with apps and the (re)constitution of menstrual cycles
Keywords:Self-tracking, Period-tracking apps, Body, Material-semiotics, Apparatus
The present article explores how cycles are brought into being through the practices and affordances involved in period-tracking with apps. Based on thirteen in-depth semi-structured interviews with period-tracking app users living in the Netherlands, it expands on literature discussing the relationship between embodiment, apps, and quantification. The contributions of this article are two-fold. Theoretically, it argues for the use of Karen Barad’s notion of apparatus to understand how bodies are (re)configured in relation to self-tracking technologies (1998). Empirically, it exposes how bodies emerge in localized period-tracking practices, within material-semiotic arrangements that both resist and reproduce cultural ideals about menstruating bodies. Period-tracking with apps, this study finds, brings the body’s interior processes into being in a “systematic” way, (re)configuring the cycle as either a series of phases or an interval with a certain (normative) duration. In all cases, periodtracking with apps becomes a means for users to access their internal body and to materialize the invisible processes of the cycle in ways that can be acted upon.
Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 88–128.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Barla, J. (2019). The techno-apparatus of bodily production: A new materialist theory of technology and the body. transcript Verlag.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Blackman, L. (2008). The body: The key concepts. Routledge.
Bloomfield, B. P., Latham, Y., & Vurdubakis, T. (2010). Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance? Sociology, 44(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362469
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253).
Chrisler, J. C., Marván, M. L., Gorman, J. A., & Rossini, M. (2015). Body appreciation and attitudes toward menstruation. Body Image, 12, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.003
Didžiokaitė, G., Saukko, P., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1470–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698478
Epstein, D. A., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. (2017). Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6876–6888. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635
Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (1st ed., pp. 295–336). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699140
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
Jørgensen, K. M. (2016). The media go-along: Researching mobilities with media at hand. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 32(60), 32–49.
Karlsson, A. (2019). A room of one’s own? Using period trackers to escape menstrual stigma. Nordicom Review, 40(S1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0017
Kressbach, M. (2019). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389
Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650
Law, J. (2010). The materials of STS. In D. Hicks, & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 173–188). Oxford Handbooks Online.
Law, J. (2019). Material semiotics. Sá mi University of Applied Sciences.
Levy, J. (2018). “It’s your period and therefore it has to be pink and you are a girl”: Users’ experiences of (de-)gendered menstrual app design. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196850
Levy, J. (2020). In_equalities, digitized: Practices, experiences and consequences of app-supported menstrual tracking. Universidad de Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/59386
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2016). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Lomborg, S., & Frandsen, K. (2016). Self-tracking as communication. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1067710
Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N. B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4590–4607.
Lupton, D. (2012). Medicine as culture: Illness, Disease and the body. Sage.
Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
Lupton, D. (2019). The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: Thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y
Lupton, D., & Maslen, S. (2018). The more-than-human sensorium: Sensory engagements with digital selftracking technologies. The Senses and Society, 13(2), 190–202.
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2015). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. transcript Verlag.
Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. DIGITAL HEALTH, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590
Pols, J., Willems, D., & Aanestad, M. (2019). Making sense with numbers: Unravelling ethico-psychological subjects in practices of self-quantification. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(S1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12894
Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068
Ruckenstein, M. (2015). Uncovering everyday rhythms and patterns: Food tracking and new forms of visibility and temporality in health care. In L. Botin, P. Bertelsen, & C. Nøhr (Eds.), Studies in health technology and informatics (pp. 28–40). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-560-9-28
Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709.
Swain, R., & Ugalmugle, S. (2019, December 3). Femtech market value to cross $48.5 billion by 2025: Global Market Insights, Inc. GlobeNewswire News Room.
van Dijck, J. (2011). The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging. University of Washington Press.
Wood, J. M. (2020). (In)visible bleeding: The menstrual concealment imperative. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. A. Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 319–336). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_25
- 2022-01-03 (2)
- 2021-12-22 (1)
How to Cite
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals. Articles published in MedieKultur may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
The authors and MedieKultur own the copyright to the published articles and reviews.