Materializing
Period-tracking with apps and the (re)constitution of menstrual cycles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.122621Keywords:
Self-tracking, Period-tracking apps, Body, Material-semiotics, ApparatusAbstract
The present article explores how cycles are brought into being through the practices and affordances involved in period-tracking with apps. Based on thirteen in-depth semi-structured interviews with period-tracking app users living in the Netherlands, it expands on literature discussing the relationship between embodiment, apps, and quantification. The contributions of this article are two-fold. Theoretically, it argues for the use of Karen Barad’s notion of apparatus to understand how bodies are (re)configured in relation to self-tracking technologies (1998). Empirically, it exposes how bodies emerge in localized period-tracking practices, within material-semiotic arrangements that both resist and reproduce cultural ideals about menstruating bodies. Period-tracking with apps, this study finds, brings the body’s interior processes into being in a “systematic” way, (re)configuring the cycle as either a series of phases or an interval with a certain (normative) duration. In all cases, periodtracking with apps becomes a means for users to access their internal body and to materialize the invisible processes of the cycle in ways that can be acted upon.
References
Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 88–128.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Barla, J. (2019). The techno-apparatus of bodily production: A new materialist theory of technology and the body. transcript Verlag.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Blackman, L. (2008). The body: The key concepts. Routledge.
Bloomfield, B. P., Latham, Y., & Vurdubakis, T. (2010). Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance? Sociology, 44(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362469
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
Chrisler, J. C., Marván, M. L., Gorman, J. A., & Rossini, M. (2015). Body appreciation and attitudes toward menstruation. Body Image, 12, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.003
Didžiokaitė, G., Saukko, P., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1470–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698478
Epstein, D. A., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. (2017). Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6876–6888. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635
Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (1st ed., pp. 295–336). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699140
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jørgensen, K. M. (2016). The media go-along: Researching mobilities with media at hand. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 32(60), 32–49.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429
Karlsson, A. (2019). A room of one’s own? Using period trackers to escape menstrual stigma. Nordicom Review, 40(S1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0017
Kressbach, M. (2019). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389
Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650
Law, J. (2010). The materials of STS. In D. Hicks, & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 173–188). Oxford Handbooks Online.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
Law, J. (2019). Material semiotics. Sá mi University of Applied Sciences.
http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2019MaterialSemiotics.pdf
Levy, J. (2018). “It’s your period and therefore it has to be pink and you are a girl”: Users’ experiences of (de-)gendered menstrual app design. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196850
Levy, J. (2020). In_equalities, digitized: Practices, experiences and consequences of app-supported menstrual tracking. Universidad de Granada. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/59386
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2016). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Lomborg, S., & Frandsen, K. (2016). Self-tracking as communication. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1067710
Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N. B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4590–4607.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818778542
Lupton, D. (2012). Medicine as culture: Illness, Disease and the body. Sage.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446254530
Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
Lupton, D. (2019). The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: Thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y
Lupton, D., & Maslen, S. (2018). The more-than-human sensorium: Sensory engagements with digital selftracking technologies. The Senses and Society, 13(2), 190–202.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2018.1480177
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2015). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. transcript Verlag.
Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. DIGITAL HEALTH, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590
Pols, J., Willems, D., & Aanestad, M. (2019). Making sense with numbers: Unravelling ethico-psychological subjects in practices of self-quantification. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(S1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12894
Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068
Ruckenstein, M. (2015). Uncovering everyday rhythms and patterns: Food tracking and new forms of visibility and temporality in health care. In L. Botin, P. Bertelsen, & C. Nøhr (Eds.), Studies in health technology and informatics (pp. 28–40). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-560-9-28
Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090
Swain, R., & Ugalmugle, S. (2019, December 3). Femtech market value to cross $48.5 billion by 2025: Global Market Insights, Inc. GlobeNewswire News Room.
van Dijck, J. (2011). The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging. University of Washington Press.
Wood, J. M. (2020). (In)visible bleeding: The menstrual concealment imperative. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. A. Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 319–336). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_25
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-01-03 (2)
- 2021-12-22 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
