Period-tracking with apps and the (re)constitution of menstrual cycles


  • Victoria Andelsman University of Amsterdam



Self-tracking, Period-tracking apps, Body, Material-semiotics, Apparatus


The present article explores how cycles are brought into being through the practices and affordances involved in period-tracking with apps. Based on thirteen in-depth semi-structured interviews with period-tracking app users living in the Netherlands, it expands on literature discussing the relationship between embodiment, apps, and quantification. The contributions of this article are two-fold. Theoretically, it argues for the use of Karen Barad’s notion of apparatus to understand how bodies are (re)configured in relation to self-tracking technologies (1998). Empirically, it exposes how bodies emerge in localized period-tracking practices, within material-semiotic arrangements that both resist and reproduce cultural ideals about menstruating bodies. Period-tracking with apps, this study finds, brings the body’s interior processes into being in a “systematic” way, (re)configuring the cycle as either a series of phases or an interval with a certain (normative) duration. In all cases, periodtracking with apps becomes a means for users to access their internal body and to materialize the invisible processes of the cycle in ways that can be acted upon.


Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 88–128.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Barla, J. (2019). The techno-apparatus of bodily production: A new materialist theory of technology and the body. transcript Verlag.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Blackman, L. (2008). The body: The key concepts. Routledge.

Bloomfield, B. P., Latham, Y., & Vurdubakis, T. (2010). Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance? Sociology, 44(3), 415–433.

Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253).

Chrisler, J. C., Marván, M. L., Gorman, J. A., & Rossini, M. (2015). Body appreciation and attitudes toward menstruation. Body Image, 12, 78–81.

Didžiokaitė, G., Saukko, P., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1470–1487.

Epstein, D. A., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. (2017). Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6876–6888.

Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68.

Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1991). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (1st ed., pp. 295–336). London: Routledge.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.

Jørgensen, K. M. (2016). The media go-along: Researching mobilities with media at hand. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 32(60), 32–49.

Karlsson, A. (2019). A room of one’s own? Using period trackers to escape menstrual stigma. Nordicom Review, 40(S1), 111–123.

Kressbach, M. (2019). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261.

Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640.

Law, J. (2010). The materials of STS. In D. Hicks, & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 173–188). Oxford Handbooks Online.

Law, J. (2019). Material semiotics. Sá mi University of Applied Sciences.

Levy, J. (2018). “It’s your period and therefore it has to be pink and you are a girl”: Users’ experiences of (de-)gendered menstrual app design. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 63–65.

Levy, J. (2020). In_equalities, digitized: Practices, experiences and consequences of app-supported menstrual tracking. Universidad de Granada.

Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2016). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900.

Lomborg, S., & Frandsen, K. (2016). Self-tracking as communication. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 1015–1027.

Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N. B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: Checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4590–4607.

Lupton, D. (2012). Medicine as culture: Illness, Disease and the body. Sage.

Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453.

Lupton, D. (2019). The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: Thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 125–139.

Lupton, D., & Maslen, S. (2018). The more-than-human sensorium: Sensory engagements with digital selftracking technologies. The Senses and Society, 13(2), 190–202.

Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2015). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. transcript Verlag.

Pantzar, M., & Ruckenstein, M. (2017). Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. DIGITAL HEALTH, 3, 1–10.

Pols, J., Willems, D., & Aanestad, M. (2019). Making sense with numbers: Unravelling ethico-psychological subjects in practices of self-quantification. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(S1), 98–115.

Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84.

Ruckenstein, M. (2015). Uncovering everyday rhythms and patterns: Food tracking and new forms of visibility and temporality in health care. In L. Botin, P. Bertelsen, & C. Nøhr (Eds.), Studies in health technology and informatics (pp. 28–40). IOS Press.

Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709.

Swain, R., & Ugalmugle, S. (2019, December 3). Femtech market value to cross $48.5 billion by 2025: Global Market Insights, Inc. GlobeNewswire News Room.

van Dijck, J. (2011). The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging. University of Washington Press.

Wood, J. M. (2020). (In)visible bleeding: The menstrual concealment imperative. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. A. Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 319–336). Palgrave Macmillan.



2021-12-22 — Updated on 2022-01-03


How to Cite

Andelsman, V. (2022). Materializing: Period-tracking with apps and the (re)constitution of menstrual cycles. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 37(71), 054–072. (Original work published December 22, 2021)



Articles: Theme section