Netflix and the design of the audience
The homogenous constraints of data-driven personalization
This paper explores how audiences engage with Netflix as an intermediary in their digital lives, and how Netflix, as it is designed, creates a highly constrained system for its users. The paper is based on a study of observed use and discussions with Netflix users. It explores the limitations that are designed into Netflix as a digital media platform, and how Netflix users engage with this system that obscures rather than clarifies the contents of the platform. The paper discusses examples of frustration, confusion, and misdirection that Netflix, as a heavily constrained system, cultivates. It argues that the thoughts, feelings, and desires of audiences are not reflected in the data-driven design of digital media platforms like Netflix. Instead, data are used by Netflix to design a personalized environment that acts as a set of blinders which constrain the agency of the audience through an interface designed to dazzle and disorient Netflix users.
Allen, J., & Chudley, J. (2012). Smashing UX design: Foundations for designing online user experiences. Wiley.
Andreeva, N. (2019). Feeling the churn: Why Netflix cancels shows after a couple of seasons and why they can’t move to new homes. Deadline. Retrieved from https://deadline.com/2019/03/netflix-tv-seriescancellations-strategy-one-day-at-a-time-1202576297/
Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075319
Bolter, J.D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0 263276411424420
Dean, J. (2012). The communist horizon. Verso.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Eyal, N., & Hoover, R. (2014). Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Penguin.
Giddings, S. (2009). Events and collusions: A glossary for the microethnography of video game play. Games and Culture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412008325485
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, & K.A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167–194). MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Love, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.
Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177% 2F1461444814538646
Han, B. (2017). Psycho-politics. Verso.
Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & de Angeli, A. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 15–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jordan, T. (2013). Information as politics. Culture Machine, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ j.ctt183p2xf
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P.H. (2019). Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443719855301
Lovely, S. (2019). How many titles are available on Netflix in your country? Cordcutting. Retrieved from https://cordcutting.com/blog/how-many-titles-are-available-on-netflix-in-your-country/
Lovink, G. (2011). Networks without a cause. Polity.
Markham, A., Stavrova, S., & Schlüter, M. (2019). Netflix, imagined affordances, and the illusion of control. In T. Plothe & A. Buck (Eds.), Netflix at the nexus (pp. 29–46). Peter Lang.
Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/jeu.2014.0002
Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
Polson, P., Lewis, C., Reiman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N
Shaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443717692741
Siles, I., Espinoza-Rojas, J., Naranjo, A., & Tristán, M.F. (2019). The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz025
Sundar, S., & Marathe, S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x
Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public. First Monday, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901
Williams, R. (1990). Television (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426647
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals. Articles published in MedieKultur may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
The authors and MedieKultur own the copyright to the published articles and reviews.