Netflix and the design of the audience

The homogenous constraints of data-driven personalization

  • Jeremy Ryan Matthew Coquitlam College
Keywords: Affordances, agency, design, digital media, Netflix, techno-social systems

Abstract

This paper explores how audiences engage with Netflix as an intermediary in their digital lives, and how Netflix, as it is designed, creates a highly constrained system for its users. The paper is based on a study of observed use and discussions with Netflix users. It explores the limitations that are designed into Netflix as a digital media platform, and how Netflix users engage with this system that obscures rather than clarifies the contents of the platform. The paper discusses examples of frustration, confusion, and misdirection that Netflix, as a heavily constrained system, cultivates. It argues that the thoughts, feelings, and desires of audiences are not reflected in the data-driven design of digital media platforms like Netflix. Instead, data are used by Netflix to design a personalized environment that acts as a set of blinders which constrain the agency of the audience through an interface designed to dazzle and disorient Netflix users.

References

Allen, J., & Chudley, J. (2012). Smashing UX design: Foundations for designing online user experiences. Wiley.

Andreeva, N. (2019). Feeling the churn: Why Netflix cancels shows after a couple of seasons and why they can’t move to new homes. Deadline. Retrieved from https://deadline.com/2019/03/netflix-tv-seriescancellations-strategy-one-day-at-a-time-1202576297/

Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075319

Bolter, J.D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.

Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0 263276411424420

Dean, J. (2012). The communist horizon. Verso.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001

Eyal, N., & Hoover, R. (2014). Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Penguin.

Giddings, S. (2009). Events and collusions: A glossary for the microethnography of video game play. Games and Culture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412008325485

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, & K.A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167–194). MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Love, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.

Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177% 2F1461444814538646

Han, B. (2017). Psycho-politics. Verso.

Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & de Angeli, A. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 15–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219

Jordan, T. (2013). Information as politics. Culture Machine, 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ j.ctt183p2xf

Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438

Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P.H. (2019). Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443719855301

Lovely, S. (2019). How many titles are available on Netflix in your country? Cordcutting. Retrieved from https://cordcutting.com/blog/how-many-titles-are-available-on-netflix-in-your-country/

Lovink, G. (2011). Networks without a cause. Polity.

Markham, A., Stavrova, S., & Schlüter, M. (2019). Netflix, imagined affordances, and the illusion of control. In T. Plothe & A. Buck (Eds.), Netflix at the nexus (pp. 29–46). Peter Lang.

Matrix, S. (2014). The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, 6(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/jeu.2014.0002

Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385

Polson, P., Lewis, C., Reiman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N

Shaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443717692741

Siles, I., Espinoza-Rojas, J., Naranjo, A., & Tristán, M.F. (2019). The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz025

Sundar, S., & Marathe, S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 298–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x

Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public. First Monday, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901

Williams, R. (1990). Television (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426647

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile.

Published
2020-12-11
How to Cite
Matthew, J. (2020). Netflix and the design of the audience. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 36(69), 052-070. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.121223