Friends, lovers, risk and intimacy: risk-taking as a socially meaningful practice
In this article we aim to analyse and discuss the notion of risk in photo-sharing practices and the purposes risk serves in the development of intimate relationships. We will argue that risk in the form of self-disclosure is an inseparable aspect of intimate photo-sharing rather than an undesirable side-effect, and that a broader analytical perspective on the role of risk in the development of intimate relationships allows us to understand risky photo-sharing as socially meaningful practice. We will unfold and elaborate this theoretical perspective on the basis of five focus-group interviews with 21 German high schools students aged 14 to 17. The interviews focus on the participants’ sharing practices, and the role risk plays in relation to these practices. The data indicates that risk does indeed serve a social purpose as a way of ‘proving friendship’. Yet, it also indicates that the young people in question are more willing to accept risk related to ‘friendly intimacy’ as compared to ‘romantic intimacy’. We will discuss the possible background for this difference as well as its wider methodological and theoretical implications.
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum, 26(3), doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.665840.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernisation. London: SAGE.
Bräuchler, B., & Postill, J. (2010). Theorising Media and Practice (Vol. 4). New York: Berghahn Books.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1035033042000238295
Davidson, J. (2015). Sexting: Gender and Teens. Berlin: Springer.
Demant, J. (2012). Natural interactions in artificial situations: Focus groups as an active social experiment. In L. Naidoo (Ed.), An Ethnography of Global Landscapes and Corridors (pp. 57-88). Rijeka: Intech. https://doi.org/10.5772/34659
Despret, V. (2004). Our Emotional Makeup: Ethnopsychology and Selfhood. New York: Other Press.
Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), Art. 9. dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
France, A. (2008). Risk factor analysis and the youth question. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(1), 1-15.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Graham, L., Jordan, L., Hutchinson, A., & de Wet, N. (2018). Risky behaviour: A new framework for understanding why young people take risks. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(3), 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1380301
Green, J., & Hart, L. (1998). Th e impact on context on data. In R.S. Barbour, & B.J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice (pp. 21-35). London: Sage.
Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., de Crespigny, C., & Delmar, C. (2011). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i1.4273
Habuchi, I. (2005). Accelerating refl exivity. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life (pp. 165-182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5309.001.0001
Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348683
Halkier, B. (2011). Methodological practicalities in analytical generalization. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(9), 787-797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411423194
Hart, M. (2017). Being naked on the internet: Young people’s selfi es as intimate edgework. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1212164
Hjorth, L., & Lim, S. S. (2012). Mobile intimacy in an age of aff ective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies,12(4), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741860
Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497
Jensen, K.B. (2002). Th e complementarity of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in media and communication research. In K.B. Jensen (Ed.), A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies (pp. 254-272). London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465103
Joinson, A.N., & Paine, C.B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet. In A.N. Joinson, K.Y.A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 237-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0016
Kofoed, J., & Larsen, M.C. (2016). A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L.F., & Pietromonaco, P.R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688
Lippman, J.R., & Campbell, S.R. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t… if you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415
Livingstone, S., & Mason, J. (2015). Sexual Rights and Sexual Risks among Youth Online: A Review of Existing Knowledge Regarding Children and Young People’s Developing Sexuality in Relation to New Media Environments. Rome: European NGO Alliance for Child Safety Online.
Lomborg, S. (2011). Social media as communicative genres. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 27(51), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1086/229379
Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851-886.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Morgan, D. (2002). Sociological perspectives on the family. In A. Carling, S. Duncan & R. Edwards. (Eds.), Analysing Families Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice (pp. 147-164). New York: Routledge.
Morrissey, S. A. (2008). Performing risks: Catharsis, carnival and capital in the risk society. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(4), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802139713
Park, N., Jin, B., & Annie Jin, S.-A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974-1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004
Reis, H.T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S.W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 367-389). West Sussex: Wiley & Sons.
Ringrose, J., Harvey L., Gill, R., & Livingstone S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853
Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(75)80025-4
Rubin, Z., Hill, C.T., Peplau L.A., & Dunkelschetter, C. (1980). Self-disclosure in dating couples: Sex roles and the ethic of openness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(2), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/351228
Sørensen, A.S. (2012). Facebook selvfremstilling, small talk og social regulering. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 28(52), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v28i52.5640
Tiidenberg, K., & Cruz, E.G. (2015). Selfi es, image and the re-making of the body. Body & Society, 21(4), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x15592465
Turnbull, G., & Spence, J. (2011). What’s at risk? The proliferation of risk across child and youth policy in England. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(8), 939-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2011.616489
Van House, N.A. (2009). Collocated photo sharing, story-telling, and the performance of self. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(12), 1073-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.003
Van House, N.A. (2011). Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies, 26(2), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2011.571888
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Van Gool, E. (2014). Sexting: Between thrill and fear—How schools can respond. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(5), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.918532
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Heirman, W. (2015). The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behavior: Integrative review. The Journal of School Nursing, 31(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840514541964
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
Villi, M. (2007). Mobile visual communication. Nordicom Review, 28(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0200
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 177-199). London: SAGE.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals. Articles published in MedieKultur may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
The authors and MedieKultur own the copyright to the published articles and reviews.