”Det lyder helt sindssygt det her, men jeg bliver nødt til at sige det”
En konversationsanalytisk undersøgelse af samtaler om svære emner og tabuer i podcasten Hjerteflimmer for voksne
Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, Storytelling, Troubles-telling, Podcast, TaboosAbstract
This paper examines the emergence and management of taboos in the Danish podcast Hjerteflimmer for voksne. Through a conversation analytic approach, it describes how participants display an orientation toward the topic of conversation as taboo. Based on three podcast sequences, the study focuses on when and how something is verbalized as taboo. The analyses show that the problem teller generally pre-announces their telling as taboo. However, co-participants may also verbalize other participants’ turns at talk as taboo. In closing, the results from the analyses will be discussed in comparison with previous conversation analytic studies of troubles-telling in naturally occurring interaction.
References
Arminen, I. 2004. Second Stories: the salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics 36(2). 319–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.07.001.
Bro, S. 2020. Yakyza & David Mandel. DR Lyd. 30. december 2020.
https://www.dr.dk/lyd/special-radio/hjerteflimmer-for-voksne/hjerteflimmer-for-voksne-14 (tilgået 10. september 2022).
Bro, S. 2021. Anne Emma Haudal & Christian Degn. DR Lyd. 1. december 2021.
https://www.dr.dk/lyd/special-radio/hjerteflimmer-for-voksne/hjerteflimmer-for-voksne-49 (tilgået 15. september 2022).
Hepburn, A. 2004. Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription, and Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(3). 251–290. DOI: https://doi-org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1.
Heritage, J. 2011. Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction. T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (red.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008.
Jefferson, G & Lee, J. R. E. 1981. The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics 5(5). 399–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6.
Jefferson, G. 1985. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.), Structures of Social Action. 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.021.
Jefferson, J. 2015. Talking about troubles in conversation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kurri, K. 2005. The invisible moral order: Agency, Accountability and Responsibility in Therapy Talk. Jyväskylä studies in education psychology and social research 260.
Liddicoat, A. J. 2011. An introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
Mandelbaum, J. 2012. Storytelling in Conversation. J. Sidnell & T. Stivers, (red), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. 492–507. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi-org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk/10.1002/9781118325001.ch24.
Nielsen, M. F. & Nielsen, S. B. 2005. Samtaleanalyse. København: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
Olsen, O. A. 2009. Psykoanalyse. Den Store Danske, 12. oktober 2009. https://denstoredanske.lex.dk/psykoanalyse (tilgået 12. maj 2023).
Pedersen, M. C. 2017, 7/11. Utroskab er en ekstremt almindelig handling. Alligevel er vi elendige til at forstå den. Zetland, 7. november 2017.
https://www.zetland.dk/historie/sOz9aXpD-aoV3ME1j-9c7ca (tilgået 20. oktober 2022).
Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. J. Maxwell Atkinson (red.), Structures of Social Action. 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008.
Steensig, J. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Steensig, J. 2015. Konversationsanalyse. S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative Metoder. 321–347. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Stivers, T. 2008. Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on language and social interaction 41(1). 31–57. DOI: https://doi-org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk/10.1080/08351810701691123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author and Journal of Language Works
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author/the authors hold the rigths to articles presented in the journal. The author/the authors are granted the right to reproduce their article as they see fit, if they mention LWorks as the original publisher of the article.
