Distributed, Negotiable and Hyper-Individual Towards a Definition of Shareable Knowledge

Keywords: knowledge sharing, groups, metaphors

Abstract

This article presents a definition of sharable knowledge. The study presented in this article shows that knowledge is best shared in the format of high degree of interaction and high degree of use of shared modes.

When groups wish to share or co-create knowledge, they often end up exchanging information or experiences instead. This article puts forward the claim, that knowledge cannot be shared like a cake or another physical resource, as it is by definition bound to personal experience. Thus when sharing knowledge, groups are either exchanging knowledge mono-modally, often through language, or they co-create something that either of the group members could have come up with themselves. The latter form of knowledge sharing might actually be knowledge co-creation rather than sharing, but is nevertheless what is sought for in knowledge sharing processes.

The article outlines six cases of which three were successful in sharing and co-creating knowledge and three were not. One of the successful cases is submitted to microanalysis and on that basis some fundamental claims are made about multimodal knowledge sharing and -co-creation.

The overall conclusion is, that multiple modes are not enough for multimodal knowledge sharing to take place. Rather groups wanting to share knowledge must interact as well as make shared use of the available modes. This in turn has consequences for the definition of knowledge as well as for sharing-practices.

References

Bjørndahl, J. S., Fusaroli, R., Østergaard, S., & Tylén, K. (2014). Thinking together with material representations: Joint epistemic actions in creative problem solving. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 103–123. http://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0006

Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032

Clark, A. (1998). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. http://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Cristancho, S. (2015). Eye opener: exploring complexity using rich pictures. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(3), 138–141. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0187-7

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what They Know. Harvard Business Press.

Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J. S., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K. (2016). A Heart for Interaction: Shared Physiological Dynamics and Behavioral Coordination in a Collective, Creative Construction Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, No Pagination Specified. http://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000207

Greve, L. (2015). Knowledge Sharing is Knowledge Creation - An Intervention Study of Metaphors for Knowledge. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Communication, 2(1).

Greve, L. (2016). Metaphors for Knowledge in Knowledge Intensive Groups - An Inductive Study of how and which Metaphors Emerge in Conversations. Aarhus University, Department of Business Communication.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Jacobs, C. D., & Heracleous, L. T. (2006). Constructing Shared Understanding The Role of Embodied Metaphors in Organization Development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 207–226. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305284895

Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297. http://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.948798

Kastberg, P. (2010). Knowledge Communication. Formative Ideas and Research Impetus. Programmatic Perspectives, 2(1), 59–71.

Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. van. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company : how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412

Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being (First Edition edition). University Of Chicago Press.

Polanyi, M. (2012). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

Qvortrup, L. (2004). The Mystery of Knowledge. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 11(3), 9–29.

Qvortrup, L. (2006). Knowledge, Education and Learning. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.

Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706

Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465–481. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y

Tylén, K., Philipsen, J. S., Roepstorff, A., & Fusaroli, R. (2016). Trails of meaning construction: Symbolic artifacts engage the social brain. NeuroImage, 134, 105–112. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.056

Zimmerman, P. H., Bolhuis, J. E., Willemsen, A., Meyer, E. S., & Noldus, L. P. J. J. (2009). The Observer XT: A tool for the integration and synchronization of multimodal signals. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 731–735. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.731

Published
2017-01-24
How to Cite
Greve, L. (2017). Distributed, Negotiable and Hyper-Individual Towards a Definition of Shareable Knowledge. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Communication, 3(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.7146/jookc.v3i1.24619
Section
Articles