Count(q) does not imply Count(p)

Søren Riis


I solve a conjecture originally studied by M.Ajtai. It states that for different primes q, p the matching principles Count(q) and Count(p) are logically independent. I prove that this indeed is the case. Actually I show that Count(q) implies Count(p) exactly when each prime in p also is a factor in q.

Full Text:


This website uses cookies to allow us to see how the site is used. The cookies cannot identify you or any content at your own computer.

ISSN: 0909-0878 

Hosted by the Royal Danish Library and Aarhus University Library