Count(q) does not imply Count(p)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v1i21.21646Resumé
I solve a conjecture originally studied by M.Ajtai. It states that for different primes q, p the matching principles Count(q) and Count(p) are logically independent. I prove that this indeed is the case. Actually I show that Count(q) implies Count(p) exactly when each prime in p also is a factor in q.Downloads
Publiceret
1994-07-03
Citation/Eksport
Riis, S. (1994). Count(q) does not imply Count(p). BRICS Report Series, 1(21). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v1i21.21646
Nummer
Sektion
Artikler
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).