This is an outdated version published on 2022-12-19. Read the most recent version.

Literatura digital para el fin del mundo

ecología y algoritmos en el Capitaloceno

Authors

  • Alex Saum-Pascual University of California Berkeley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/dl.v31i.134295

Keywords:

algorithms, capitalocene, ecology, environmental studies, digital literature

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between digital technologies and climate damage, looking at a selection of works of digital literature that expose their entanglement within material networks of mineral extraction and energy consumption. It argues that the modern dichotomous framework that separates humans from nature has propelled the evolution of digital technologies, paving the way to contemporary globalization. Using the Capitalocene (Moore) as alternative periodization, I analyze the work of 8 digital artists from the Latin American diaspora and Spain who challenge the virtual/material and human/nature divisions and defend, instead, a posthumanist ethical relationship with nature (Braidotti, Haraway, Hayles). Finally, from this environmental perspective, I argue that digital literature’s planetary impact situates it at the center of any transatlantic studies discussion.

References

Aranda, Yto. 2007. La mano del hombre. Escáner cultural. http://escaner.cl/yto/net-art/clima.

Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.

Cárdenas, Micha. 2014. Redshift and Portalmetal. Itch.io. http://micharoja.itch.io/redshift-and-portalmetal.

Chun, Wendy. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Dobson, Andrew. 1995. Green Political Thought. Londres: Routledge

Edwards, Jason. 2010. “The Materialism of Historical Materialism”. En New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, editado por Diana Coole y Samantha Frost, 281-298. Durham: Duke.

Ferreboeuf, H.; et al. 2019. “Towards Digital Sobriety”. The Shift Project. The Carbon Transition Think Tank, https://theshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Lean-ICT-Report_The-Shift-Project_2019.pdf.

Flores, Leonardo. 2019. “Third Generation Electronic Literature”. Electronic book review 7, http://doi.org/10.7273/axyj-3574/.

Gache, Belén. 2012. Word Market. Museo Extremeño e Iberoamericano de Arte Contemporáneo. https://meiac.es/turbulence/archive/Works/word-market/.

Hayles, Katherine N. 2020. Postprint: Books and Becoming Computational. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 2008. Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Huhtamo, Erkki. 2011. “Dismantling the Fairy Engine: Media Archaeology as Topos Study”. En Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications and Implications, editado por Erkki Huhtamo y Jussi Parikka, 27-47. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Karhio, Anne. 2020. “Ethics and Aesthetics of (Digital) Space: Institutions, Borders and Transnational Frameworks of Digital Creative Practice in Ireland”. Electronic book review, https://doi.org/10.7273/z9s9-bd83.

Kittler, Friedrich. 1997. “There Is No Software”. En Literature, Media, Information systems, compilado por Friedrich Kittler, 130-1146. Londres: Routledge.

Kotari, Ashish; Salleh, Ariel; Escobar, Arturo; Demaria, Federico; Acosta, Alberto. 2019. Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. 2019. Nueva Delhi: Tulika Books.

Läufer, Milton. 2020. 8 minutes and 46 seconds (I can’t breathe). MiltonLaufer.com https://miltonlaufer.com.ar/8minutes46seconds/.

Moll, Joana. 2022. Carbolytics. https://carbolytics.org/.

Moll, Joanna. 2016. DEFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOREST. Jana Virgin. https://janavirgin.com/CO2/DEFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOREST.html/.

Moll, Joanna. 2019. The Hidden Life of an Amazon User. Jana Virgin. https://janavirgin.com/AMZ/.

Moore, Jason. 2016. “Introduction”. En Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism, editado por Jason Moore, 1-11. Oakland: PM Press.

Parenti, Christian. 2016. “Environment-Making in the Capitalocene: Political Ecology of the State”. En Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism, editado por Jason Moore, 177-184. Oakland: PM Press.

Parikka, Jussi. 2015. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Raley, Rita. 2009. Tactical Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rettberg, Scott. 2018. Electronic Literature. London: Polity.

Santamaría, Mario. 2016. Travel to My Website. MarioSantamaria.net, https://mariosantamaria.net/travel-to-my-website/.

Silva, Ana Marques da. 2017. “Zoom In, Zoom Out, Refocus: is a Global Electronic Literature Possible?”. Hyperrhiz: New Media Cultures, 16, https://doi:10.20415/hyp/016.e01.

Statistical Atlas. 2022. “Languages in California”. Statistical Atlas, https://statisticalatlas.com/state/California/Languages/.

Tabbi, Joseph. 2010. “Electronic Literature as World Literature; or, The Universality of Writing under Constraint”. Poetics Today 31(1): 17-50.

Tisselli, Eugenio. 2014. The 27th. El 27. Motorhueso, https://motorhueso.net/27/.

Tisselli, Eugenio. 2018. Mycelium Rider. Motorhueso, https://motorhueso.net/mycelium/index_es.html/.

Tisselli, Eugenio. 2019. Amazon. Motorhueso, https://motorhueso.net/amazon/es/.

Torre, Román. 2015. Body Mutations. RomanTorre.net, https://romantorre.net/v4/en/portfolio/039-bodymutations-2/.

Tortosa, José María. 2019. “Maldevelopment”. En Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary, editado por Ashish Kotari, Ariel Salleh, Arturo Escobar, Federico Demaria y Alberto Acosta, 9-12. Nueva Delhi: Tulika Books.

Yussof, Kathryn. 2018. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Published

2022-12-19

Versions

How to Cite

Saum-Pascual, A. (2022). Literatura digital para el fin del mundo : ecología y algoritmos en el Capitaloceno. Diálogos Latinoamericanos, 31, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.7146/dl.v31i.134295