Innovation og iværksætteri på de danske universiteter: Mulige indikatorer til UFS’ databeredskab på forsknings- og innovationsområdet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v16i1.156126Keywords:
Innovation, Indikatorer, Iværksætteri, UniversiteterAbstract
Denne rapport præsenterer en oversigt over mulige indikatorer for universitetssektorens innovationsaktiviteter. Rapporten er rekvireret af Uddannelses- og Forskningsstyrelsen (UFS) og har til formål at understøtte Styrelsens arbejde med at udvide datagrundlaget for analyser af universiteternes innovation, iværksætteri og impact i Danmark. Kataloget skal facilitere udvælgelsen af indikatorer, som kan anvendes til regelmæssig monitorering og effektanalyser af danske universiteters bidrag til innovationsøkosystemet.
References
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., 2013. The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy 42(2), 408-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
Agrawal, A., Henderson, R.M., 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48, 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
Aldridge, T.T., Audretsch, D., Desai, S., Nadella, V., 2014. Scientist entrepreneurship across scientific fields. Journal of Technology Transfer 39, 819-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9339-x
Altmetric.com, 2023. How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated? Link: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated
Anderson, R.D., 2010. The 'idea of a university' today. Essay on History and Policy website. Link: http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-98.html
Arora, A., Belenzon, S., Cioaca, L.C., Sheer, L., Zhang, H., 2023. The Effect of Public Science on Corporate R&D. NBER Working Papers 31899, National Bureau of Economic Research. Link: https://www.nber.org/papers/w31899 https://doi.org/10.3386/w31899
Arundel, A., Es-Sadki, N., 2021. Toward a Comprehensive Set of Metrics for Knowledge Transfer. In: Harnessing Public Research for Innovation in the 21st Century: An International Assessment of Knowledge Transfer Policies, Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Development, eds. A. Arundel, S. Athreye, and S. Wunsch-Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. chapter, 425-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904230.025
Arundel, A., Wunsch-Vincent, S., 2021. Evaluating Knowledge Transfer Policies and Practices: Conceptual Framework and Metrics. In: Harnessing Public Research for Innovation in the 21st Century: An International Assessment of Knowledge Transfer Policies, Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Development, eds. A. Arundel, S. Athreye, and S. Wunsch-Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. chapter, 35-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904230.008
Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., Woerter, M., 2008. University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy 37: 1865-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
Audretsch, D.B., 2014. From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer 39, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
Azagra-Caro, J.M., Carayol, N., Llerena, P., 2006. Patent production at a European research university: exploratory evidence at the laboratory level. Journal of Technology Transfer 31, 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6110-3
Balconi, M., Laboranti, A., 2006. University-industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Research Policy 35, 1616-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.018
Beck, M., Junge, M., Kaiser, U., 2018. Public funding and corporate innovation, KOF Working Papers, No. 437, ETH Zurich, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, Zurich. Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000227682
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Martin-Sanchez, V., 2024. Seizing the economic and social impact of universities' knowledge exchange activities: Does one size fit all? The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10115-4
Bigliardi, B., Galati, F., Verbano, C., 2013. Evaluating Performance of University Spin-Off Companies: Lessons from Italy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 8(2), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000200015
Bishop, K., D'Este, P., Neely, A., 2011. Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy 40, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.009
Bornmann, L., 2013. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803
Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., Marx, W., 2016. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y
Bradley, S.R., Hayter, C.S., Link, A.N., 2013. Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571-650. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000048
Branscomb, L.M., Brooks, H. (Eds.), 1993. Empowering Technology: Implementing a U.S. strategy. Boston: MIT Press.
Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R.L. (Eds.), 1999. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Calvert, J., Martin, B.R., 2001. Changing conceptions of basic research? Background report for the OECD Workshop on Policy Relevance and Measurement of Basic Research, 29-30 October 2001, Oslo.
Carayannis, E.G., Rogers, E.M., Kurihara, K., Allbritton, M.M., 1998. High-Technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation 18(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00101-6
Carree, M., Della Malva, A., Santarelli, E., 2014. The contribution of universities to growth: empirical evidence for Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer 39, 393-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9282-7
Christensen, T.A., 2024. Theory-of-Change used in Research-for-Impact-in-Society: What it is, how it works and what it delivers. Novo Nordic Foundation. Copenhagen
David, P.A., Metcalfe, S., 2009. How the universities can best contribute. In: Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for science, technology and innovation. Selected papers from Research Commissioner Janez Potočnik's Expert Group. Link: http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/selected_papers_en.pdf
David, P.A., Mowery, D.C., Steinmueller, W.E., 1994. Analyzing the Economic Payoffs from Basic Research. In: Mowery, D.C. (Ed.). Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1374-8_3
D'Este, P., Patel, P., 2007. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36, 1295-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
D'Este, P., Perkmann, M., 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer 36, 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and HM Treasury, 2023. Independent review of university spin-out companies. An independent report by Professor Irene Tracey and Doctor Andrew Williamson of university spin-out companiesand the government's response. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-university-spin-out-companies
Elsevier, 2024. Towards the 4th generation university: The transformative role of TU/e in delivering innovation and impact in the Eindhoven region. Link: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/towards-the-fourth-generation-university
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B.R.C., 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29, 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
European Commission, 2022. Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/2415 of 2 December 2022 on the guiding principles for knowledge valorisation. Link: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022H2415&qid=1670573108748
European Commission, 2012. Interim Findings 2011 of the Knowledge Transfer Study 2010-2012. Bonn/Maastricht/Solothurn. Cited in OECD (2013).
European Commission, 2009. Metrics for knowledge transfer from public research organisations in Europe - Report from the European Commission's Expert Group on Knowledge Transfer Metrics. Link: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/49910
Feller, I., 1990. Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy 19, 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90017-Z
Fier, H., Pyka, A., 2014. Against the one-way-street: analyzing knowledge transfer from industry to science. Journal of Technology Transfer 39, 219-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9226-7
Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., Wiklund, J., 2018. Rethinking the commercialization of public science: from entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0206
Fini, R., Lacetera, N., Shane, S., 2010. Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy 39, 1060-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.014
Frontier Economics, 2014. Rates of return to investment in science and innovation. A report prepared for the UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). July 2014. Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/333006/bis-14-990rates-of-return-to-investment-in-science-and-innovationrevised-final-report.pdf
Geuna, A., 1999. The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035351381
Geuna, A., 2001. The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues 3, 607-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506393
Geuna, A., Muscio, A., 2009. The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva 47, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
Geuna, A., Nesta, L.J.J., 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35: 790-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D.S., Wright, M., 2011. 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy 40, 1045-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
Grimpe, C., Fier, H., 2010. Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer 35, 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4
Hayter, C.S., Rasmussen, E., Rooksby, J.H., 2020. Beyond formal university technology transfer: innovative pathways for knowledge exchange. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9677-1
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England), 2015. Higher Education - Business and Community Interaction survey: 2013-14. Link: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/201513
Jensen, R., Thursby, M., 2001. Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. The American Economic Review 91, 240-259.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.240
JRC, 2020. Knowledge transfer metrics - Towards a European-wide set of harmonised indicators, Dinnetz, M.(editor), Publications Office of the European Union. Link: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/907762
Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., 1992. Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992.
Kogut, B., 2000. The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal 21, 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO;2-5
Kongsted, H.C., Tartari, V., Cannito, D., Norn., M.T., Wohlert, J., 2017. University researchers' engagement with industry, the public sector and society - Results from a 2017 survey of university researchers in Denmark. Link: https://dea.nu/publikationer/university-researchers-external-engagement-with-industry-the-public-sector-and-society/
Kolympiris, C., Klein, P.G., 2017. The Effects of Academic Incubators on University Innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1242
Kryl, D., Allen, L., Dolby, K., Sherbon, B., & Viney, I., 2012. Tracking the impact of research on policy and practice: investigating the feasibility of using citations in clinical guidelines for research evaluation. BMJ open, 2(2), e000897. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000897
Landry, R., Amara, N., Ouimet, M., 2007. Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. Journal of Technology Transfer 32, 561-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0017-5
Landry, R., Saïhi, M., Amara, N., Ouimet, M., 2010. Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities. Research Policy 39, 1387-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.003
Langford, C.H., Hall, J., Josty, P., Matos, S., Jacobson, A., 2006. Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? Research Policy 35, 1586-1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.021
Lee, Y.S., 1996. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25, 843-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8
Leendertse, J., Schrijvers, M., Stam, E., 2022. Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics. Research Policy, 51(9), 104336-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104336
LERU, 2024. Next Generation Metrics for Scientific and Scholarly Research in Europe - LERU position paper. Link: https://www.leru.org/publications/enhancing-research-evaluation-with-next-generation-metrics
Martin, B.R., 2003. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In: Geuna, A., Salter, A.J., Steinmueller, W.E. (Eds.), Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Martin, B.R., 2007. Assessing the impact of basic research on society and the economy. Paper presented at the Rethinking the impact of basic research on society and the economy (WF-EST International Conference, 11 May 2007), Vienna, Austria.
Mendonça, S., Pereira, T.S., and Godinho, M.M., 2004. Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research policy 33(9): 1385-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.005
Merrill, S.A., Mazza, A.M., 2010. Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest. Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue, National Research Council. Cited in OECD (2013).
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27, 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8
Meyer, M., Sinilainen, T., Utecht, J., 2003. Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026240727851
Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E., 2007. Ambiguity and conflict in the development of 'Third Mission' indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592
Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P., 2011. Tracing 'productive interactions' to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876706
Nelson, R.R., 2001. Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2), 13-19.
Nelson, R.R., 2006. Reflections on 'The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research': looking back and looking forward. Industrial and Corporate Change 15, 903-917. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl022
Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., Schillaci, C.E., 2018. The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 640-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2
Norn, M.T., Jensen, B.L., Laursen, U., 2013. Fra Forskning til Faktura - hvad kan vi lære af ti års forsøg på at tjene penge på forskning? Link: https://dea.nu/publikationer/fra-forskning-til-faktura/
Norn, M.T., Wohlert, J., Anthonsen, M., 2014. University researchers' collaboration with industry and the public sector - A survey of university researchers in Denmark. Link: https://dea.nu/publikationer/forskersurvey-survey-of-university-researchers-in-denmark
Norn, M.T., 2016. What lies beneath the surface? A review of academic and policy studies on collaboration between public research and private firms. Link: https://dea.nu/publikationer/hvad-ligger-under-overfladen-et-litteraturstudie-om-samarbejde-mellem-den-offentl/
OECD. 2012. Interactions for innovation: Commercialisation of public research. In: OECD. The Science, Technology and Industry e-Outlook. Link: http://www.oecd.org/sti/outlook/e-outlook/stipolicyprofiles/interactionsforinnovation/commercialisationofpublicresearch.htm
OECD, 2013. Commercialising public research: New trends and strategies. Link: http://www.oecd.org/sti/scitech/commercialising-public-research.htm
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Benneworth, P., Castro-Martínez, 2016. Does it take two to tango? Factors related to the ease of societal uptake of scientific knowledge. Science & Public Policy, 43(6), 751-762, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw016.
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E., 2014. Informal collaborations between social sciences and humanities researchers and non-academic partners. Science and Public policy 41, 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct075
Palerai, S., Donina, D., Meoli, M., 2015. The role of the university in twenty-first century European society. Journal of Technology Transfer 40, 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9348-9
Pavitt, K., 2001. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (and what they should not learn). Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 761-779. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.761
Pedersen, D.B., Grønvad, J.F., Hvidtfeldt, R., 2020. Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities - A literature review. Research Evaluation, 29(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz033
Pedersen, D. B., 2023. An evaluation framework for institutional capacity of science-for-policy ecosystems in EU Member States. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Pedersen, D. B. & Hvidtfeldt, R., 2023. The missing links of research impact. Research Evaluation, rvad011.
Pedersen, D.B., 2024. Mission Guidebook. A Research Management Guide to Mission-Driven Universities. Aalborg University Press. Aalborg.
Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J.-M., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., Tartari, V., 2015. Accounting for universities' impact: using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv020
Perkmann, M., Salter A., 2012. How to create productive partnerships with universities. MIT Sloan Management Review 53, 79-88.
Perkmann, M., Neely, A., Walsh, K., 2011. How should firms evaluate success in university-industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00637.x
Perkmann, M., Walsh, K., 2007. University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9, 259280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
Ponomariov, B., Boardman, P.C., 2008. The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. Journal of Technology Transfer 33, 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9029-z
Rosenberg, N., Nelson, R.N., 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23, 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
Rosli, A., Rossi, F., 2015. Monitoring the knowledge transfer performance of universities: an international comparison of models and indicators. Working Paper. Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK. Link: https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/18449/
Salter, A., 2002. The tip of the iceberg: understanding university-industry interactions. Seminar at the Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, September 27, 2002.
Salter, A.J., Martin, B.R., 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 30, 509-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
Salter, A.J. et al., 2000. Talent, not technology : publicly funded research and innovation in the UK. Report from SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., Fröhlich, J., 2002. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31, 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1
Scherer, F. M., Harhoff, D., 2000. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Research Policy 29: 559-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00089-X
Shane, S., 2004a. Academic entrepreneurship: University spin-offs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843769828
Shane, S., 2004b. Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing 19, 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00114-3
Sivertsen, G., Meijer, I., 2020. Normal versus extraordinary societal impact: how to understand, evaluate, and improve research activities in their relations to society? Research Evaluation, 29(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz032
Spaapen, J., van Drooge, L., 2011. Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
Squicciarini, M., H. Dernis and C. Criscuolo, 2013. Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2013/03, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Szomszor, M., & Adie, E. 2022. Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations. Quantitative science studies, 3(3), 624-650. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00204
Tavoletti, E., 2013. Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0090-y
Tether, B.S., 2002. Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy 31, 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K., 2016. Are citations from clinical trials evidence of higher impact research? An analysis of ClinicalTrials. gov. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1341-1351.Thursby, J.G., Thursby, M.C., 2007. University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23: 620-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2112-1
UCI, 2023. KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE FUNDING REVIEW: Insights from a review of the literature. Link: https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/UCI/knowledgehub/documents/2023_UCI_KE_FundingReviewReport_vFinal5.pdf
UFS, 2014. Bedre dokumentation af videninstitutionernes bidrag til innovation - Et inspirationskatalog. Link: https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2014/bedre-dokumentation-af-videninstitutionernes-bidrag-til-innovation
Valdivia, W.D. 2013. University Start-Ups: Critical for Improving Technology Transfer. Paper from Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings. Link: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2013/11/university-start-ups-technology-transfer-valdivia
Verspagen, B., 2006. University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. Journal of Economic Surveys 20, 607-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x
Veugelers, R., 2014. The contribution of academic research to innovation and growth. WWW for Europe Working Paper No. 71.
VIV-rapporten, 2019. Ketels, C. et al. Peer Review of the Danish R&I System Ten steps, and a leap forward: taking Danish innovation to the next level Ten steps, and a leap forward: taking Danish innovation to the next level Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility Report. https://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/rad-og-udvalg/tidligere-rad-og-udvalg/videnbaseret-innovation-i-verdensklasse.
Wohlert, J., Norn, M.T., 2023. Fra forskning til forandring: Hvordan kan universiteternes innovationsindsats bidrage til udviklingen af forskningsbaserede løsninger på store samfundsudfordringer? Link: https://dea.nu/publikationer/fra-forskning-til-forandring/
Woltmann, S.L., Alkærsig, L., 2018. Tracing university-industry knowledge transfer through a text mining approach. Scientometrics, 117(1), 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2849-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CFA Scientific Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License terms apply for all publications unless specifically stated otherwise on the publication.
