COLLABORATION IN RESEARCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v8i1.151260Keywords:
Citation impact, Research collaboration, Public-private collaborationAbstract
This report seeks to examine the production of research in Denmark, the extent of public-private collaboration and its relation to both scientist’s scientific performance and firm’s economic performance in the period from 1995-2013. The focus of this report is on research measured in terms of scientific publications and research collaboration measured through the co-authorship of publications.
References
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., and Solazzi, M. (2009). University-industry collaboration: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6-7), 498-507. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003
Arundel, A. and Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13(6):559-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859092000234311
Balconi, M. and Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics, Research Policy, 35: 1616-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.018
Bekkers, R. and Bodas-Freitas, I-M., (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, Research Policy, 37(10): 1837-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Bornmann, L., and Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation. 64(1):45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., and Slade, C. P. (2013). Research Collaboration in Universities and Academic Entrepreneurship: The-State-of-the-Art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some pratical guidence for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1): 31-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., and Vonortas, N. S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1): 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013025615518
D'Este, P. and M. Perkmann (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer 36(3): 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Introduction to the special "Triple Helix" issue of Research Policy 29(2): 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Fritsch, M. and Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-University Co-operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems. Industry and Innovation 6(1):69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719900000005
Gläser, J., and Laudel, G. (2007). "The Social Construction of Bibliometric Evaluations". In R. Whitley and J. Gläser (Eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences (Vol. 26, pp. 101-123): Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5
Hanel, P., and St-Pierre, M. (2006). Industry-University collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4): 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-0009-5
Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2013). The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer 38: 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9229-4
Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2):245-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7
Katz, J S and Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3):541-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459299
Lebeau, L-M., Laframboise, M-C., Larivière, V. and Gingras, Y. (2008). The effect of university-industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: the Canadian case, 1980-2005. Research Evaluation 17(3): 227-232. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X331685
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2): 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895322042
Li, Y., Youtie, J. and Shapira, P. (2015). Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer 40:1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9391-6
Lucio-Arias, D. and Leydesdorff, L. (2009). An Indicator of Research Front Activity: Measuring Intellectual Organization as Uncertainty Reduction in Document Sets, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60(12):2488-2498 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21199
Lundvall, B-Å. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers.
Martin, B. and Tang, P. (2007). The benefits from publicly funded research, SPRU Working Paper Series 161, SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex.
Merton, R.K. (1988). The Matthew Effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4):606-623. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848
Nelson, Richard R. (ed.) (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A comparative study, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change 18(6): 1033-1065. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp015
Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández-Esquinas, M. and Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, E. (2009). Measuring university-industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics 84 (3), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0113-z
Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110207885
Simeth, M. and Lhuillery, S. (2015). How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure? Research Policy 44:1283-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.005
Small, H., Boyack, K.W. and Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy 43 (8), 1450-1467 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005
Small, H. G., and Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures, I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. and Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy 33 (3), 425-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004
van Raan, Anthony F. J. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36:397-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129602
van Raan, Anthony F. J. (1998). In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much - Comments on: Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43:129-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458401
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CFA Scientific Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License terms apply for all publications unless specifically stated otherwise on the publication.
