Mapping Danish Research on Research and Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v6i1.150974Keywords:
Research on research innovation, Mapping, Bibliometrics, Co-nominationAbstract
This report presents the results of a study aimed at mapping Danish research on research and innovation (RI-research). The study was conducted by the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, from December 2013 to September 2014, for the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, under the Ministry of Higher Education and Science. The report contains results and analyses based on five interconnected parts of the study: (1) desk research providing an initial overview of a diverse field and a working definition of RI-research; (2) a survey among department heads addressing the resources and organization of RI-research; (3) a co-nomination study among researchers in the field mapping the cognitive networks and cooperation patterns; (4) qualitative interviews with key researchers in the field; and (5) bibliometric analyses of the impact of Danish RI-research.
References
Bloch, C., Sørensen, M. P., Graversen, E. K., Schneider, J. W., Schmidt, E. K., Aagaard, K., & Mejlgaard, N. (2014). Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach. Evaluation and program planning, 43, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.005
Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of management, 29(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00013-8
Clausen, T., Fagerberg, J., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2012). Mobilizing for change: a study of research units in emerging scientific fields. Research Policy, 41(7), 1249-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.014
Damvad (2013). Forskning om forskning og innovasjon. Kartlegging for Forskningsrådet.
European Commission (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. COM 152, Brussels.
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research policy, 38(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research policy, 41(7), 1132-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
Georghiou, L. (1996). The UK technology foresight programme. Futures, 28(4), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00013-4
Giusti, W. L., & Georghiou, L. (1988). The use of co-nomination analysis in real-time evaluation of an R&D programme. Scientometrics, 14(3), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020079
Lenk, P. (1983). Mappings of fields based on nominations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(2), 115-122. Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340204
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Martin, B. R., Nightingale, P., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2012). Science and technology studies: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1182-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.010
Nedeva, M., Georghiou, L., Loveridge, D., & Cameron, H. (1996). The use of co‐nomination to identify expert participants for Technology Foresight. R&D Management, 26(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00939.x
OECD (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264199040-en
OECD (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. European Commission and Eurostat. (Oslo Manual). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
OECD (2009). Higher Education to 2030, Volume 2. Globalisation, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264075375-en
van Eck & Waltman (2009). VOSviewer Manual. Available at: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.1.0.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CFA Scientific Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License terms apply for all publications unless specifically stated otherwise on the publication.
