Evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v5i1.150955Keywords:
Performance based funding, Bibliometrics, Publication indicatorAbstract
Dette er en evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikator, som er udarbejdet på opdrag af Universitets- og høgskolerådet. Af dette opdrag fremgik det at: "Hovedhensikten med evalueringen er å undersøke om formålet med publiseringsindikatoren er innfridd: Har indikatoren stimulert til mer forskning, og forskning av høyere kvalitet?" Evalueringen fokuserer primært på fire blokke, som vedrører henholdsvis virkninger af indikatoren, egenskaber ved indikatoren, indikatorens organisering og endelig anvendelsen af indikatoren internt på institutionerne i universitets- og højskolesektoren. Evalueringen er i den sammenhæng primært afgrænset til netop universitets- og højskolesektoren med undtagelse af spørgsmålet om ’organisering af indikatoren’, hvor institut- og helsesektorens inklusion også inddrages.
References
Aagaard, K. (2011). Kampen om basismidlerne. Historisk institutionel analyse af basisbevillingsmodellens udvikling på universitetsområdet i Danmark. Aarhus: Forskerskolen for Samfundsvidenskab v. Aarhus Universitet.
Ahlgren, P. (2013). Indikatorn source normalized impact per paper i relation till den norske modellen. Stockholms universitet. http://www.sub.su.se/media/826307/nm-snip.pdf.
Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C. & Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds. Scientometrics, 92(3), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0632-x
Aksnes , D.W., Schneider, J.W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised count-ing methods. Journal of Informetrics,6 , 1 , 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002
Barker, K. (2007). "The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system" in Research Evaluation, 16 (1), 2007 (3-12). https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X190674
Benner, M. & Sandström, U. (2000). "Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system". Research Policy 29(2): pp. 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00067-0
Budtz Pedersen, D. (2008). "Udfordringer for en humanistisk videnspolitik". Humaniora, September 2008, Vol. 3/2008, pp. 30-34.
Butler, L. (2004). What Happens When Funding is Linked to Publication Counts?, I: H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (red.) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 340-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_18
Butler, L. (2010). Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: A review of the concerns and the evidence. I: Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings. Paris: OECD, 2010, 127-165. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264094611-7-en
Debackere, K. & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics 59 (2), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018532.70146.02
Edquist, O. (2003). "Layered science and science policies". Minerva 41: pp. 207-221 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025509629159
Foss Hansen, H. (2009). Forskningsevaluering: Metoder, praksis og erfaringer. Forskning: Analyse og Evaluering 1/2009. Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen:
Foss Hansen, H. (2010). "Performance indicators used in performance-based research funding systems". Paper commissioned by the OECD Secretariat (Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry) for the OECD-Norway Workshop on Performance-Based Funding of Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions, held on 21 June 2010 in Paris
Gläser, J. (2007). "The social orders of Research Evaluation Systems" in R.Whitley & J. Gläser (eds.): The Changing Governance of the Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_12
Gläser, J. & Laudel, G. (2007). The Social Construction of Bibliometric Evaluations', I: R. Whitley & J. Glaäser (red.) The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, Sociology of Sciences Yearbook 26, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5
Glänzel, W. (2008). Seven myths in bibliometrics. About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies. I: H. Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Red.) Proceedings of WIS 2008, Berlin, Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics and Ninth COLLNET Meeting Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Library and Information Science (IBI): http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/GlanzelWIS2008smb.pdf.
Geuna, A. & Martin, B.R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41 (4), 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd
Heitmann, P., Rønningen, M.O., & Strøm, H. (2013).Publisering ved Universitetet i Oslo 2006-2011. Rapport. Oslo Universitet.
Heitmann, P., Rønningen, M.O., & Strøm, H. (2013). Publiseringsmodell til besvær? Forskningspolitikk, 3, 2013, s. 24-25.
Hernes, S. (2007). Publiseringspoeng og referansekvalitet. Forskerforum 6, 34-35.
Hernes, S. (2009). Tellekantsystemet - Bibliografiske smutthull og mulige tetningsmidler. Lillehammer.
Hicks, D. (2010). Overview of models of performance-based Research funding systems. I: Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings. Paris: OECD, 2010, 23-52. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264094611-4-en
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, Volume 41, Issue 2, March 2012, Pages 251-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
Karlsson, S. & Persson, O. (2012). The Swedish production of highly cited papers. Stockholm: Vetenkapsradet.
Katz, J.S., & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Lindsey, D. (1989). Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science - measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid. Scientometrics, 15 (3-4), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017198
Mejlgaard, N., Aagaard, K. (2009). "Hvilken slags politik er forskningspolitik - nu?". I: Økonomi og Politik. Vol. 82, Nr. 2, 01.01.2009. pp. 50-66
Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159 (3810), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Moravcsik, M.J. (1973) Measures of scientific growth. Research Policy, 2, 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(73)90006-1
Piro, Fredrik Niclas; Aksnes, Dag W.; Rørstad, Kristoffer; (2013). A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64: 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22746
Plomp, R. (1989). Statistical reliability of citation frequency as an indicator of scientific impact. Scientometrics, 17 (1-2), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017724
Schneider, J.W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8 (3), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2009.19
Schneider, J.W. & Aagaard, K. (2012). Stor ståhej for ingenting - Den danske bibliometriske indicator. I "Dansk Forskningspolitik efter Årtusindskiftet. Aarhus Universitetsforlag. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.608187.11
Sivertsen, G. (2008). Den norske modellen. Forskningspolitikk, 1/2008, 14-15.
Sivertsen, Gunnar; Schneider, Jesper W; (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. ISSN: 1892-2597. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning.
Kyvik, Svein & Sivertsen, Gunnar (2013). Økende forskningsformidling. Forskningspolitikk, 4, 2013, s. 16-17.
UHR (2004). Vekt på forskning. Nytt system for dokumentasjon av vitenskapelig publisering. Innstilling fra faglig og teknisk utvalg til UHR. Univeritets- og Høgskolerådet, http://www.uhr.no/documents/Vekt_p__forskning__sluttrapport.pdf.
Vagstad, S. et. al. (2007) Finansieringssystemet for universitets- og høyskolesektoren - teoretiske vurderinger. Rapport udarbejdet på opdrag fra Kunnskabsdepartementet
Van Raan, A. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36, 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129602
Van Raan, A. (2005). "Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods". Scientometrics, 62 (1): pp.133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Noyons, E.C.M, Tijssen, R.J.W., van Eck, N.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Raan, A.F.J., Visser, M, and Wouters P. (2012) The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 12, 2419-2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708
Warner, J. (2000). A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises. Journal of Information Science, 26, 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600607
Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62 (1), 117-131 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CFA Scientific Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License terms apply for all publications unless specifically stated otherwise on the publication.
