A Case for Dynamic Reverse-code Generation

Forfattere

  • Jooyong Lee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v14i15.22179

Resumé

Backtracking (i.e. reverse execution) helps the user of a debugger to naturally think backwards along the execution path of a program, and thinking backwards makes it easy to locate the origin of a bug. So far backtracking has been implemented mostly by state saving or by checkpointing. These implementations, however, inherently do not scale. As has often been said, the ultimate solution for backtracking is to use reverse code: executing the reverse code restores the previous states of a program. In our earlier work, we presented a method to generate reverse code on the fly while running a debugger. This article presents a case study of dynamic reverse-code generation. We compare the memory usage of various backtracking methods in a simple but nontrivial example, a bounded-buffer program. In the case of non-deterministic programs such as this bounded-buffer program, our dynamic reverse-code generation can outperform the existing backtracking methods in terms of memory efficiency.

Publiceret

2007-11-15

Citation/Eksport

Lee, J. (2007). A Case for Dynamic Reverse-code Generation. BRICS Report Series, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v14i15.22179

Nummer

Nr. 15 (2007): RS-15 Not published

Sektion

Artikler

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).