On the Equivalence between Small-Step and Big-Step Abstract Machines: A Simple Application of Lightweight Fusion

Forfattere

  • Olivier Danvy
  • Kevin Millikin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v14i16.21935

Resumé

We show how Ohori and Sasano's recent lightweight fusion by fixed-point promotion provides a simple way to prove the equivalence of the two standard styles of specification of abstract machines: (1) in small-step form, as a state-transition function together with a `driver loop,' i.e., a function implementing the iteration of this transition function; and (2) in big-step form, as a tail-recursive function that directly maps a given configuration to a final state, if any. The equivalence hinges on our observation that for abstract machines, fusing a small-step specification yields a big-step specification. We illustrate this observation here with a recognizer for Dyck words, the CEK machine, and Krivine's machine with call/cc.

The need for such a simple proof is motivated by our current work on small-step abstract machines as obtained by refocusing a function implementing a reduction semantics (a syntactic correspondence), and big-step abstract machines as obtained by CPS-transforming and then defunctionalizing a function implementing a big-step semantics (a functional correspondence).

Downloads

Publiceret

2007-11-12

Citation/Eksport

Danvy, O., & Millikin, K. (2007). On the Equivalence between Small-Step and Big-Step Abstract Machines: A Simple Application of Lightweight Fusion. BRICS Report Series, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v14i16.21935

Nummer

Nr. 16 (2007): RS-16 On the Equivalence between Small-Step and Big-Step Abstract Machines: A Simple Application of Lightweight Fusion

Sektion

Artikler

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).