Syntactic Theories in Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v9i4.21721Resumé
The evaluation function of a syntactic theory is canonically defined as the transitive closure of (1) decomposing a program into an evaluation context and a redex, (2) contracting this redex, and (3) plugging the contractum in the context. Directly implementing this evaluation function therefore yields an interpreter with a worst-case overhead, for each step, that is linear in the size of the input program. We present sufficient conditions over a syntactic theory to circumvent this overhead, by replacing the composition of (3) plugging and (1) decomposing by a single ``refocusing'' function mapping a contractum and a context into a new context and a new redex, if there are any. We also show how to construct such a refocusing function, we prove its correctness, and we analyze its complexity.We illustrate refocusing with two examples: a programming-language interpreter and a transformation into continuation-passing style. As a byproduct, the time complexity of this program transformation is mechanically changed from quadratic in the worst case to linear.
Downloads
Publiceret
2002-01-05
Citation/Eksport
Danvy, O., & Nielsen, L. R. (2002). Syntactic Theories in Practice. BRICS Report Series, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v9i4.21721
Nummer
Sektion
Artikler
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).