A Unifying Approach to Goal-Directed Evaluation

Forfattere

  • Olivier Danvy
  • Bernd Grobauer
  • Morten Rhiger

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v8i29.21689

Resumé

Goal-directed evaluation, as embodied in Icon and Snobol, is built on the notions of backtracking and of generating successive results, and therefore it has always been something of a challenge to specify and implement. In this article, we address this challenge using computational monads and partial evaluation.

We consider a subset of Icon and we specify it with a monadic semantics and a list monad. We then consider a spectrum of monads that also fit the bill, and we relate them to each other. For example, we derive a continuation monad as a Church encoding of the list monad. The resulting semantics coincides with Gudeman's continuation semantics of Icon.

We then compile Icon programs by specializing their interpreter (i.e., by using the first Futamura projection), using type-directed partial evaluation. Through various back ends, including a run-time code generator, we generate ML code, C code, and OCaml byte code. Binding-time analysis and partial evaluation of the continuation-based interpreter automatically give rise to C programs that coincide with the result of Proebsting's optimized compiler.

Downloads

Publiceret

2001-07-04

Citation/Eksport

Danvy, O., Grobauer, B., & Rhiger, M. (2001). A Unifying Approach to Goal-Directed Evaluation. BRICS Report Series, 8(29). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v8i29.21689

Nummer

Nr. 29 (2001): RS-29 A Unifying Approach to Goal-Directed Evaluation

Sektion

Artikler

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).