Effective Bounds on Strong Unicity in L1-Approximation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v8i14.20471Resumé
In this paper we present another case study in the general project of Proof Mining which means the logical analysis of prima facie non-effective proofs with the aim of extracting new computationally relevant data. We use techniques based on monotone functional interpretation (developed in [17]) to analyze Cheney's simplification [6] of Jackson's original proof [9] from 1921 of the uniqueness of the best L1-approximation of continuous functions f in C[0, 1] by polynomials p in Pn of degree <= n. Cheney's proof is non-effective in the sense that it is based on classical logic and on the non-computational principle WKL (binary K¨onig lemma). The result of our analysis provides the first effective (in all parameters f, n and epsilon) uniform modulus of uniqueness (a concept which
generalizes `strong uniqueness' studied extensively in approximation theory). Moreover, the extracted modulus has the optimal epsilon-dependence as follows from Kroo [20]. The paper also describes how the uniform modulus of uniqueness can be used to compute the best L1-approximations of a fixed f in C[0, 1] with arbitrary precision, and includes some remarks on the case of best Chebychev approximation.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).