Democratic Consensus and the Local Majority Rule
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v7i8.20135Resumé
In this paper we study a rather generic communication/coordination/ computation problem: in a finite network of agents,
each initially having one of the two possible states, can the majority
initial state be computed and agreed upon (i.e., can a democratic
consensus be reached) by means of iterative application of
the local majority rule. We show that this task is failure-free only
in the networks that are nowhere truly local. In other words, the
idea of solving a truly global task (reaching consensus on majority
) by means of truly local computation only (local majority rule)
is doomed for failure.
We also show that even well connected networks of agents that
are nowhere truly local might fail to reach democratic consensus
when the local majority rule is applied iteratively. Structural
properties of democratic consensus computers, i.e., the networks
in which iterative application of the local majority rule always
yields consensus in the initial majority state, are presented.
Downloads
Publiceret
2000-01-08
Citation/Eksport
Mustafa, N. H., & Pekec, A. (2000). Democratic Consensus and the Local Majority Rule. BRICS Report Series, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.7146/brics.v7i8.20135
Nummer
Sektion
Artikler
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).