The User Reconfigured: On Subjectivities of Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21298Keywords:
User, subjectivity, sexuality, theory, criticismAbstract
Foundational to HCI is the notion of “the user.” Whether a cognitive processor, social actor, consumer, or even a non- user, the user in HCI has always been as much a technical construct as actual people using systems. We explore an emerging formulation of the user—the subjectivity of in- formation—by laying out what it means and why research- ers are being drawn to it. We then use it to guide a case study of a relatively marginal use of computing—digitally mediated sexuality—to holistically explore design in rela- tion to embodiment, tactual experience, sociability, power, ideology, selfhood, and activism. We argue that subjectivi- ties of information clarifies the relationships between de- sign choices and embodied experiences, ways that designers design users and not just products, and ways to cultivate and transform, rather than merely support, human agency.
References
Bannon, L., and Bødker, S. (1991). Beyond the inter- face: Encountering artifacts in use. In Designing Inter- action: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Carooll, J. (eds.). Cambridge UP, 227-253.
Bardzell, J. (2011) Interaction criticism: an introduction to the practice. Interacting with computers 23(6): 604- 621.
Bardzell, J., and Bardzell, S. (2011). “Pleasure is your birthright”: Digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI. Proc. of CHI'11.
Bell, S. (2010) Fast Feminism. Autonomedia.
Bertselsen, O. & Pold, S. (2004). Criticism as an ap- proach to interface aesthetics. Proc. of NordiCHI’04, ACM Press, 23-32.
Blackman, L. (2008). The Body. Berg.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
Card, S., Moran, T., Newell, A., 1983. The Psychology of Human–Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Carroll, N. (2009). On criticism. Routledge. 10.Cockton, G. (2008). Revisiting usability's three key
principles. CHI2008 EA. 2473-2484.
Cooper, G., and Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the us- er: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human- computer interaction. In Thomas, P. (ed.). The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer inter- faces. Cambridge UP.
Dourish et al. (2012). Research Themes: Intel Science and Technology Center for Social Computing. http://socialcomputing.uci.edu/content/research-themes
Eldridge, R. (2003). An introduction to the philosophy of art. Cambridge UP.
Goodman, E. and Vertesi, J. (2012). Designing for X? Distribution choices and ethical design. CHI’12 EA. ACM Press.
Gordo López, Á., and Cleminson, R. (2004). Techno- sexual Landscapes: changing relations between tech- nology and sexuality. Free Association Books.
Gould, J. & Lewis, C. (1985) Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communica- tions of the ACM 28(3), ACM Press, 300–11.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press.
Horrocks, R. (1997). An introduction to the study of sexuality. Macmillan Press, Ltd.
How, A. (2003). Critical Theory. Palgrave Macmillan
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, B. (2010). Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. Proc. of CHI’10. ACM.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Powers of horror: An essay on ab- jection. Columbia UP.
Kuutti, K. (2001). Hunting for the lost user: From sources of errors to active actors – and beyond. Cultural Usability Seminar, Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, 24.4.
Laine, T. (2007). Shame and desire: Emotion, intersub- jectivity, cinema. Peter Lang.
McCarthy, J., and Wright, P. (2004). Technology as ex- perience. MIT Press.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
Norman, D., 2002. The Design of Everyday Things.
Basic Books, New York.
Nussbaum, M. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford UP.
Pace, T., Bardzell, S., and Bardzell, J. (2010). The rogue in the lovely black dress: Intimacy in World of Warcraft. Proc. of CHI’10. ACM.
Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, pa- triarchy, and popular literature. The University of North Carolina Press.
Russon, J. (2009). Bearing witness to epiphany: Per- sons, things, and the nature of erotic life. SUNY Press.
Satchell, C., and Dourish, P. (2009). Beyond the user: Use and non-use in HCI. Proc of OzCHI'09. 9-16.
Schilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. Sage.
Seidman, S. (2003). The social construction of sexuality. W.W. Norton & Company.
Semans, A. (2004). The many joys of sex toys: The ulti- mate how-to handbook for couples and singles. Broad- way Books.
Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness, and conven- ience: The social organization of normality. Berg.
Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: A philoso- phy of mindfulness and somaethestics. Cambridge UP.
Shusterman, R. (2011): Somaesthetics. In: Soegaard, M. and Dam, R.F. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Human- Computer Interaction. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interac- tion Design Foundation.
Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. Routledge.
Sonneveld, M., and Schifferstein, H. (2008). The tactual experience of objects. In Schifferstein, H., and Hekkert, P. (eds.). Product experience. Elsevier.
Suchman, L., 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Sutcliffe, A. (2010) Designing for user engagement: Aesthetic and attractive user interfaces, Synthesis Lec- tures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan & Clay- pool Publishers.
Taylor, A. (2011). Out there. Proc. of CHI'11. ACM. 43.Thornham, S. (1997). Passionate detachments: An in-
troduction to feminist film theory. Arnold.
Vigarello, G. (1998). Concepts of cleanliness: Changing attitudes in France since the Middle Ages. Cambridge UP
Watson, G. (2008). Art & Sex. I.B. Tauris.
Winograd, T., Flores, F., 1986. Understanding Comput- ers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
