Between universality of science and Western provincialism: Unveiling the “imperial gaze” of the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (1930-1935)

Forfattere

  • Marie Linos Université libre de Bruxelles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v8i1-2.134011

Nøgleord:

history of the social sciences, circulation of knowledge, Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Imperialism, United States, Interwar period

Resumé

This paper examines the imperial gaze that the social sciences could endorse during the interwar period, while attempting to establish themselves as a global field. It specifically focuses on the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (ESS), an ambitious scholarly undertaking in the social sciences, edited by economists Alvin Johnson and Edwin Seligman. Fifteen volumes were published between 1930 and 1935 in total. By looking at the ESS’ contributors and articles, the paper questions the ambivalence between the universal appeal and rhetoric of this project and the actual outcome, which enforced a core/periphery division in the field of the social sciences. This indicates that, even if the ESS and its contributors defended a progressivist stance regarding colonialism, this scientific enterprise could not escape from the imperial culture that had deeply permeated US and European (social) science.

Referencer

Allen, Walter R.; Jewell, Joseph O. (2002) A Backward Glance Forward: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives on Historically Black Colleges and Universities. The Review of Higher Education 25: 241-61.

Ashcroft, Bill; Griffiths, Gareth; Tiffin, Helen (1998) Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

Bloch, Marc (1931) Instruments de recherche : Une somme des sciences sociales. Annales 11 : 390-93.

Brailsford, Henry N. (1932) Indian Question, in Edwin R. Seligman; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 7. New York: Macmillan, 659-74.

Bulmer, Martin, and Bulmer, Joan (1981) Philanthropy and Social Science in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, 1922-29. Minerva 19 (3): 347-407.

Chagnon, Marie-Ève (2018) American Scientists and the Process of Reconciliation in the International Scientific Community, 1917–1925, in: Id., and Tomas Irish (Eds.) The Academic World in the Era of the Great War, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 213 31.

Chen, Hon-Fai (2021) Between North and South: Historicizing the Indigenization Discourse in Chinese Sociology. Journal of Historical Sociology, 34 (1): 103-19.

Connell, Raewyn W. (1997) Why Is Classical Theory Classical? The American Journal of Sociology, 102 (6): 1511-57.

Davis, Alexander E. (2021) Making a settler colonial IR: Imagining the ‘international’ in early Australian International Relations. Review of International Studies, 47 (5): 637–655.

Dawley, Alan (2003) Changing the World: American Progressives in War and Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gabriel, Ralph H. (1933) Reviewed Work: Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7-8. American Historical Review, 38 (3): 526-27.

Genizi, Haim (1972) V. F. Calverton, a Radical Magazine for Black Intellectuals, 1920-1940. The Journal of Negro History 57 (3): 241-53.

Go, Julian (2013) Sociology's Imperial Unconscious: The Emergence of American Sociology, in: George Steinmetz (Ed.) Sociology and Empire the Context of Empire. The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline, Durham: Duke University Press, 83-105.

Go, Julian, and Lawson, George (Eds) (2017) Global Historical Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Holcombe, Arthur N. (1930a) Chinese Problem, in Edwin R. Seligman; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 3. New York: Macmillan, 431-36.

Holcombe, Arthur N. (1930b) Harvard Graduates in the Chinese Revolution. Harvard Alumni Bulletin. 983-88.

Holcombe, Arthur N. (1937) The Chinese Road to Office: An Occidental View of an Oriental Institution. The American Scholar 6 (1): 38-45.

Johnson, Alvin, and Seligman, Edwin (Eds.) (1930-1935) Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, 15 volumes, New York: Macmillan.

Johnson, Robert D. (1995) The Peace Progressives and American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jordan, John M. (1994) Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911-1939. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

Kaplan, Amy (1993) “Left Alone with America”: The Absence of Empire in the Study of American Culture, in Id., Donald E. Pease (Eds), Cultures of United States Imperialism. Durham: Duke University Press.

Kaviraj, Sudipta (2009) Marxism in translation: critical reflections on Indian radical thought, in: Richard Bourke, and Raymond Guess (Eds.) Political Judgement. Essays for John Dunn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 172-99.

Knight, Melvin M. (1930) Backward Countries, in Edwin R. Seligman; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 2. New York: Macmillan, 379-81.

Kramer, Paul A. (2002) Empires, Exceptions, and Anglo-Saxons: Race and Rule between the British and United States Empires, 1880-1910. The Journal of American History 88 (4): 1315-53.

Lentini, Orlando (2008) Encyclopaedia of the social sciences e Dizionario di politica, 1930-1940: enciclopedie liberal e dizionari fascisti. Retrieved from: <https://www.academia.edu/11587610/Encyclopaedia_of_the_social_sciences_e_Dizionario_di_politica_1930_1940_enciclopedie_liberal_e_dizionari_fascisti>.

[Lerner, Max] (1930) Introduction I – The Development of Social Thought and Institutions: War and Reorientation, in: Alvin Johnson, and Edwin Seligman (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 1, New York: Macmillan, 189-228.

Maas, Arthur (1979) News and Notes: Arthur N. Holcombe. PS 12 (2): 278-79.

Nugent, David (2010) Knowledge and Empire: The Social Sciences and United States Imperial Expansion. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 17 (1): 2-44.

Redd, Kenneth E. (1998) Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Making a Comeback. New Directions for Higher Education 102: 33-43

Rietzler, Katarina (2011) Experts for Peace: Structures and Motivations of Philanthropic Internationalism in the Interwar Years, in: Daniel Laqua (Ed.) International Reconfigured. Transnational Ideas and Movements Between the World Wars, London: I. B. Tauris, 45-65.

Rodgers, Daniel T. (1982) In Search of Progressivism. Reviews in American History 10 (4): 113-32.

Rodriguez Medina, Leandro (2013) Centers and Peripheries in Knowledge Production, New York: Routledge.

Rosenberg, Emily (1999) Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, Dorothy (2003) Changing Contours of The Social Science Disciplines, in: Id., Theodore Porter (Eds.) The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 7: The Modern Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205-37.

Seim, David L. (2013) Rockefeller Philanthropy and Modern Social Science. London: Pickering & Chatto.

Seligman, Edwin R. A. (1930a) Preface, in Id.; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 1. New York: Macmillan, xvii-xxii.

Seligman, Edwin R. A. (1930b) Introduction: What Are the Social Sciences, in Id.; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 1. New York: Macmillan, 3-7.

Steinmetz, George (2009) The Imperial Entanglements of Sociology in the United States, Britain, and France Since the Nineteenth Century. Ab Imperio 4: 23-79.

Throntveit, Trygve (2008) Related states: Pragmatism, progressivism, and internationalism in American thought and politics, 1880–1920. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Toda, Teizo (1930) Introduction (Social Sciences as Disciplines: Japan), in Edwin R. Seligman; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 1. New York: Macmillan, 321-23.

Tournès, Ludovic (2007) La Fondation Rockefeller et la naissance de l’universalisme philanthropique américain. Critique internationale 35 : 173-97.

Veatch, Roy (1933) Philippine Problem, in Edwin R. Seligman; Alvin Johnson (Eds), The Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol 12. New York: Macmillan, 109-16.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (2001) Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Young, Cristobal (2009) The Emergence of Sociology from Political Economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45 (2): 91–116.

Downloads

Publiceret

2024-05-30

Citation/Eksport

Linos, M. (2024) “Between universality of science and Western provincialism: Unveiling the ‘imperial gaze’ of the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (1930-1935)”, Serendipities, 8(1-2), s. 38–57. doi: 10.7146/serendipities.v8i1-2.134011.

Nummer

Sektion

Artikler