Adcock: Liberalism and Political Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.2.4Nøgleord:
Robert Adcock, history of political science, liberalismResumé
Introduction to the Symposium by Thibaud BoncourtThe following contributions stem from a roundtable held in Poznan, Poland in July 2016 at the International Political Science Association’s Congress. The roundtable was put together by IPSA’s Research Committee 33, which focuses on the history of political science as a discipline. Contributors produced a stimulating debate on Robert Adcock’s award winning Liberalism and the Emergence of Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale.
As its title suggests, this important book weaves two narratives together. First, it sheds a new light on the history of liberalism, by highlighting the way in which liberal political thought changed between the early 19th century and the early 20th century. Adcock highlights the transition from “democratised classical liberalism” to alternative conceptions of the liberal tradition such as “progressive liberalism” and “disenchanted classical liberalism”. Second, the book documents the history of the emergence of American political science. By studying the pioneers of this discipline, Adcock analyses the progressive spread and institutionalisation of political science in America until the landmark creation of the American Political Science Association (APSA, 1903).
These two stories are interesting in themselves but what makes Adcock’s argument more so is that he weaves these two trends together. He shows convincingly how the development of one of the biggest political discourses and the institutionalisation of political science fuelled one another. By linking the history of the discipline to that of political power, Adcock’s impressive study resonates with other great work on the subject such as those of Sonja Amadae (2003) and Nicolas Guilhot (2005).
Another of the book’s strengths lies in the choice of adopting a transatlantic perspective. In line with recent literature, Adcock goes beyond narratives of intellectual history as shaped by “national traditions” to emphasise the transnational exchanges that shape the history of political thought. Thus, Adcock first traces the history of liberalism in Europe, before analysing how it was imported in American academia. The book tells the story of the “Americanisation” of liberalism, understood as the way in which European liberal beliefs were adapted by American scholars to address American political and economic realities.
In order to discuss several aspects of this stimulating, multi-layered book, the roundtable gathered specialists in the history of political thought, history of political science as a discipline, and the internationalisation of the social sciences. The following three contributions raise some of the topics that were discussed at the roundtable, as well as new ones. Robert Adcock’s rejoinder discusses these topics by expanding on the book’s argument.
Referencer
Adcock, Robert (2003) The Emergence of Political Science as a Discipline: History and the Study of Politics in America, 1875-1910, History of Political Thought 24 (3): 459–86.
Adcock, Robert (2007) Interpreting Behavioralism, in: Robert Adcock, Mark Bevir, and Shannon Stimson (eds.) Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1870, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Adcock, Robert (2014a) Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adcock, Robert (2014b) A Disciplinary History of Disciplinary Histories: The Case of Political Science, in: Roger E. Backhouse, and Philippe Fontaine (eds.) A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–101.
Amadae, S. M. (2003) Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy. The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bell, Duncan (2007) The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bell, Duncan (2016) Reordering the World: Essays on Liberalism and Empire, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burgess, John W. (1891) Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law, Boston: Ginn.
Ceaser, James W. (1990) Liberal Democracy & Political Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Crick, Bernard (1959) The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fawcett, Edmund (2014) Liberalism: The Life of an Idea, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goodnow, Frank J. (1893) Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems, National and Local, of the United States, England, France, and Germany, 2 vols., New York: Putnam’s.
Goodnow, Frank J. (1900) Politics and Administration: A Study in Government, New York: Macmillan.
Goodnow Frank J. (1904) The Role of the American Political Science Association, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1, 35-46.
Guilhot, Nicolas (2005) The Democracy Makers. Human Rights and the Politics of Global Order, New York: Columbia University Press.
Haddow, Anna (1939) Political Science in American Colleges and Universities, 1636-1900, New York, London: D. Appleton-Century Company.
Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Lienesch, Michael (1988) New Order of the Ages, Time, the Constitution, and the Making of Modern American Political Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen (1982) Building a New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1977-1920, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus (1967) The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Willoughby, Westel W. (1904) Report of the Secretary for the Year 1904, Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 1: 27-32.
Willoughy, William F. (1914) The Individual and the State: Presidential Address, The Tenth Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, American Political Science Review 8 (1): 1-13.
Wilson, Woodrow (1971) The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 10, ed. Arthur S. Link. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
CC-BY-NC-ND