Competing for Status: Dynamics of Scientific Disciplines in the European Transnational Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.1.6Keywords:
Scientific disciplines, transnational field, Europe, European Research Area, European Research CouncilAbstract
Research Council (ERC) affects the competition for status among disciplines and what this means for the social sciences in particular. Two notions are of analytical importance here: the idea of a European transnational field, and investigating disciplines by comparing research capacity and performance. The field structure was examined for a sample of 12 countries and 30 disciplines from all scientific domains. The study not only sheds light on the status of the social sciences and humanities, when compared to the physical, engineering and life sciences, it also allows insights into disciplinary comparisons within one domain. Results indicate that the relative capacity of the social sciences and humanities in Europe is far from being reflected in their ERC grant performance, retaining the significance of national funding in that domain. Nevertheless, ERC funding in the social sciences and humanities is proportionally larger for some countries (United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands) than for other countries within the European Research Area.
References
Abbott, Andrew (2001) Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ben-David, Joseph (1971) The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1975) The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason, Social Science Information 14(6): 19–47.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Homo Academicus, Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001) Science of Science and Reflexivity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Louis J. D. Wacquant (1992) Réponses pour une anthropologie reflexive, Paris: Edition du Seuil.
Clark, Burton R. (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective, Berkeley University of California Press.
Cole, Stephen (1992) Making Science: Between Nature and Society, London: Harvard University Press.
Cole, Jonathan A., and Harriet Zuckerman (1975) The Emergence of a Scientific Speciality: The Self-Exemplifying Case of the Sociology of Science, in: Lewis A. Coser (Ed.) The Idea of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, New York: Jovanovic, 139–174.
Comte, Auguste (1851) Systéme de Politique Positive, ou Traité de Sociologie, Instituant la Religion de l’Humanité, Paris: L. Matthias.
Crothers, Charles (2000) Austrian Sociology: A Case Study in the Production of Social Knowledge, in: Christian Fleck (Ed.) Soziologische und historische Analysen der Sozialwissenschaften (Special Issue 5 of Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie), Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 267–286.
Fleck, Christian, and Barbara Hoenig (2014) European Sociology: Its Size, Shape, and ‘Excellence’, in: Sokratis Koniordos, and Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of European Sociology, London: Routledge, 40–65.
Flink, Tim (2016) Die Entstehung des Europäischen Forschungsrates, Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Genov, Nikolai (Ed.) (1989) National Traditions in Sociology, London: Sage.
Gingras, Yves (2002) Les formes spécifiques de l’internationalité du champ scientifique, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 141–142: 31–45.
Glänzel, Wolfgang, Konrad Debaeckere, and Martin Meyer (2008) ‘Triad’ or ‘Tetrad’? On Global Changes in a Dynamic World, Scientometrics 74(1): 71–88.
Gornitzka, Ase, and Julia Metz (2014) Dynamics of Institution Building in the Europe of Knowledge: The Birth of the European Research Council, in: Meng-Hsuan Chou and Ase Gornitzka (Eds.) Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe: New Collaborations in European Research and Higher Education Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 81–110.
Graziano, Paolo, and Marten P. Vink (2007) Europeanization: New Research Agendas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guzzetti, Luca (1995) A Brief History of European Union Research Policy, Brussels: European Commission Directorate General XII Science, Research, Development.
Guzzetti, Luca (2009) The ‘European Research Area’ Idea in the History of Community Policymaking, in: Henri Delanghe, Ugur Muldur, and Luc Soete (Eds.) European Science and Technology Policy: Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 64–77.
Heilbron, Johan (2004) A Regime of Disciplines: Towards a Historical Sociology of Disciplinary Knowledge, in: Charles Camic, and Hans Joas (Eds.) The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 23–42.
Heilbron, Johan, Lars Magnusson, and Björn Wittrock (1998) The Rise of the Social Sciences and the Formation of Modernity, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Heilbron, Johan, Nicolas Guilhot, and Laurent Jeanpierre (2008) Towards a Transnational History of the Social Sciences, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 44(2): 146–160.
HLEG, High Level Expert Group (2015) Commitment and Coherence: Essential Ingredients for Success in Science and Innovation. Ex-Post-Evaluation of the 7th EU Framework Programme (2007–2013). Report of a high-level expert group led by Chair Louise O. Fresco.
Hoenig, Barbara (2010) European Union’s Research Policies and the Social Sciences, European Perspectives 2(1): 37–58.
Hoenig, Barbara (2017) Europe’s New Scientific Elite: Social Mechanisms of Science in the European Research Area, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Koniordos, Sokratis, and Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis (2014) The Routledge Handbook of Sociology, Oxon: Routledge.
König, Thomas (2017) The European Research Council, New York: Polity Press.
Lamont, Michèle (2009) How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Lepenies, Wolfgang (1985) Die drei Kulturen: Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft, Reinbek: Hanser.
Levine, Donald N. (1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marginson, Simon, and Imanol Ordorika (2011) ‘El central volumen de la fuerza’: Global Hegemony in Higher Education and Research, in: Diana Rhoten and Craig Calhoun (Eds.) Knowledge Matters: The Public Mission of the Research University, 67–129, New York: Columbia University Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Edited and with an Introduction by Norman W. Storer), London: The University of Chicago Press.
Nedelmann, Birgitta and Piotr Sztompka (Eds.) (1993) Sociology in Europe: In Search of Identity, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
OECD (2002) Frascati Manual, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development.
OECD (2007) Working Part of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators, Revised Field of Science and Technology Classification in the Frascati Manual. 26 February.
Schulz, Peter A., and Edmilson J.T. Manganote (2012) Revisiting Country Research Profiles: Learning about the Scientific Cultures, Scientometrics 93: 517–531.
Snow, Charles P. (1959) The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, Peter, Björn Wittrock, and Richard Whitley (Eds.) (1991) Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Sciences Disciplines, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Winnacker, Ernst-Ludwig (2012) Europas Forschung im Aufbruch: Abenteuer in der Brüsseler Bürokratie, Berlin: Berlin University Press.
Zuckerman, Harriet (1977) Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, New York: Free Press.
Zuckerman, Harriet (1998) Accumulation of Advantage and Disadvantage: The Theory and Its Intellectual Biography, in: Carlo Mongardini and Simonetta Tabboni (Eds.) Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 139–162.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC-BY-NC-ND
