Sustainable Competences in Higher Educa-tion – Pre-pilot Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/fecun.v2i2.152516

Keywords:

ESD; Socio-scientific issues; action competence; teacher students; UNESCO

Abstract

This paper presents results from a case study of a Pre-pilot educational activity in the Erasmus+ project on Sustainable Competences in Higher Education Institutions (2022-2024). Teacher students’ acquisition of sustainable competences represents a major educational challenge at bachelor level and generally in education in Nordic countries and internationally. With reference to UNESCO guidelines, the overview of results indicated that in the cognitive domain learning outcomes in a medium to a high degree included acquisition of natural science knowledge about sand mining and sustainability. Furthermore, the interdisciplinary teaching methods seemed to a medium degree to facilitate teacher student motivation and learning outcomes in relation to socio-emotional dimensions and interculturality. In the behavioral domain, results indicated that student teachers to a high degree acquired competences to imagine realistic scenarios within an educational context. More research is needed in student-centered approaches, and we hope that the project has contributed to the current need for bridging the gap between traditional education and more student-centered learning in relation to ‘Futures of Education.’

References

Amos, R., & Levinson, R. (2019). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: An approach for engag-ing with the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals through school science. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 11(1), 29-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.11.1.03

Application Erasmus (2021) Sustainable Competences in Higher Education (not published).

Bendixen, M., Best, J., Hackney, C., & Iversen, L. L. (2019). Time is running out for sand. Nature, 571(7763), 29-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02042-4

Bendixen, M., Iversen, L. L., Best, J., Franks, D. M., Hackney, C. R., Latrubesse, E. M., & Tusting, L. S. (2021). Sand, gravel, and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Conflicts, synergies, and pathways forward. OneEarth,4(8),1095-1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.008

Byram, M, Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002) Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Lan-guage Teaching. A Practical Introduction for Teachers. Council of Europe, Strasbourg https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1c3

Chang, S. H. (2018). Co-Teaching in Student Teaching of an Elementary Education Program. Teacher Educators' Journal, 11, 105-113.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of positive psychology, 12(3), 297-298.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Ellebæk, J. J., & Nielsen, B. L. (2016). Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK)–et tiltrængt natur-fagsdidaktisk forskningsfelt i Danmark? MONA-Matematik-og Naturfagsdidaktik, (4).

Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Making social science matter. Social Science and Policy Challenges: Democracy, Values, and Capacities, Paris: UNESCOPublishing,25-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503

Friend, M., Reising, M., & Cook, L. (1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 37(4), 6-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.1993.9944611

Garsdal, J. (2020). Bæredygtighed og bæredygtig udvikling: uddannelse, dannelse og fagdidaktik i skole, erhvervs-og professionsuddannelser. VIA University College.

https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/107138967/PEAS_udgivelse1_BU_Dannelse_Uddannelse_ONLINE_final.pdf

Jarvis, D., & Kariuki, M. (Eds.). (2017). Co-teaching in higher education: from theory to co-practice. University of Toronto Press.

Larsen, N. (Ed.). (2023). Bæredygtig udvikling og professionsdidaktiske nedslag. VIA University College.

https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/183744260/bredygtig-udvikling-bog-a5-02-23-online.pdf

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. Supporting lifelong learning, 1, 111-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50010-1

Levinson, R., Knippels, M.C., van Dam, F., Kyza, E., Christodoulou, A., Chang-Rundgren, S.N.,

Grace, M., Yarden, A., Abril, A., Amos, R., Ariza, M.R., Bächtold, M., van Baren-Nawrocka, J.,

Cohen, R., Dekker, S., Dias, C., Egyed, L., Fonseca, M., Georgiou, Y., Hadjichambis, A., van

Harskamp, M., Hasslöf, H., Heidinger, C. Hervé, N., Karpati, A., Keedus, K., Kiraly, A., Lundström, M., Molinatti, G., Nédélec, L., Ottander, C., Ottander, K., Quesada, A., Radits, F., Radmann, D., Rauch, F., Rundgren, C., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., Sjöström, J., Verhoeff, R., Veugelers, W., Zafrani, E (2017) Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning: connecting formal and informal science education with society, Parrise. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132011509

Lysgaard, J. A., & Jørgensen, N. J. (2020). Bæredygtighedens pædagogik: forskningsperspektiver og eksempler fra praksis. Frydenlund Academic.

Læssøe, J., Schnack, K., Breiting, S., Rolls, S., Feinstein, N., & Goh, K. C. (2009). Climate change and sustainable development: The response from education. A cross-national report from in-ternational alliance of leading education institutes. The Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.

Læssøe, J., & Mochizuki, Y. (2015). Recent trends in national policy on education for sustainable development and climate change education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Develop-ment, 9(1), 27-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0973408215569112

MacPhail, A. (2020). Teacher educator as researcher: Striving towards a greater visibility for teacher education. In Being a Teacher Educator (pp. 142-154). Routledge.

OECD (2015) Frascati Manual https://www.oecd.org/innovation/frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm

Ruge, D., Johannsen, H. D., Graf, S. T., Kostanjevec, S., Kozina, F. L., Reissmannová, J. S., ... & Vik, F. N. (2022). Project SustainComp, State of the art Report.: A Case Study of Four Higher Educa-tion Institutions. Norway, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Denmark. .https://www.ucviden.dk/ws/files/168754777/SustainComp_State_of_the_Art_Report.pdf

Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3-13). Routledge.

UNESCO (2017) Rieckmann, M. Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objec-tives. UNESCO publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Ruge, D., Dawn Johannsen, H., Thedchanamoorthy, T., Rousing Lauridsen, A., Mikkelsen, S., & Gaarsmand, S. (2024). Sustainable Competences in Higher Educa-tion – Pre-pilot Study. Futures of Education, Culture and Nature - Learning to Become, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/fecun.v2i2.152516

Issue

Section

Perspectives and Explorations