The Director’s Ways of Seeing

Embodied Participation in Japanese Theater Rehearsals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v9i3.170883

Keywords:

theatrical rehersals, conversation analysis, posture, creativity, Japanese

Abstract

This study examines how participants’ bodily orientations organize transitions from preparation to performance during rehearsals for a Japanese theater production. Drawing on video-based conversation analysis, it shows that actors’ entry into performance as characters is collaboratively accomplished through embodied conduct involving both actors and the director. The director’s shifts in posture and visual orientation make her directorial way of seeing publicly intelligible and contribute to reconfiguring the participation frame for performance. At the same time, the intelligibility of this directorial way of seeing depends on how these bodily shifts are situated within the unfolding interaction. Performance as a creative activity is interactionally made possible through the coordinated embodied conduct of multiple participants.

References

Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. University of California Press.

Broth, M., & Keevallik, L. (2014). Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture, 17(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508483

Coulter, J., & Parsons, E. D. (1990). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry, 33(3), 251–272.

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2009). Pafōmansu no Bigaku [Ästhetik des Performativen] (H. Nakajima, E. Hirata, I. Terao, R. Miwa, A. Yotsuya, & K. Hagiwara, Trans.). Ronsōsha. (Original work published 2004)

Fukuichi, A., & Sugamura, G. (2022). Sitting posture and moral impression formation: a focus on traditional Japanese sitting posture (Seiza). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(2), 503–511.

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism (A. W. Rawls, Ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.

Goodwin, M. H. (1980). He‐said‐she‐said: Formal cultural procedures for the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American Ethnologist, 7(4), 674–695.

Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Indiana University Press.

Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4-5), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Heath, C. (1984). Talk and recipiency: Sequential organization in speech and body movement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.

Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge University Press.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge University Press.

Keevallik, L. (2010). Pro-adverbs of manner as markers of activity transition. Studies in Language, 34(2), 350–381. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.05kee

Krug, M. (2022). Temporal procedures of mutual alignment and synchronization in collaborative meaning-making activities in a dance rehearsal. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 957894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.957894

Krug, M. (2023). Overcoming blanking: Verbal and visual features of prompting in theatre rehearsals. Human Studies, 46, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09670-w

Krug, M. (2025). Coordinating multiactivity transitions in dance rehearsals: Spatial configurations and instructional practices. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1520005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1520005

Krug, M., & Schmidt, A. (2020). Zwischenfazit: Sukzessive und simultane Verzahnung von Spiel- und Besprechungsaktivitäten – Eine Instruktionsmatrix für Proben. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 21, 264–277.

Lefebvre, A. (2018). Reading and embodying the script during the theatrical rehearsal. Language and Dialogue, 8(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00015.lef

Lefebvre, A. (2020). Creating interactional bonds during theatrical rehearsals: An interactional approach of the documentary method of interpretation. In R. Ide & K. Hata (Eds.), Bonding through context (pp. 197–214). John Benjamins.

Lefebvre, A., & Mondada, L. (2023). Interactional contingencies in rehearsing a theater scene: The consequentiality of body arrangements as action unfolds. Human Studies, 46(2), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09669-3

Lindwall, O., & Mondada, L. (2025). Sequence organization in the instruction of embodied activities. Language & Communication, 100, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.11.003

Löfgren, A. (2023). Relocating to depict: Managing the interactional agenda at opera rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2235968

Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019

Mondada, L. (2013). Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock, & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 247–275). De Gruyter.

Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions for multimodal transcription (Version 5.0.1). https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription

Nakamura, T. (2011). Budo as a Required Subject at Junior High Schools: Bows in Budo. Research Journal of Budo, 43(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11214/budo.43.2_1

Nishizaka, A. (1992). Sanka fure-mu no shintaiteki soshikika [Participation frame as an arrangement of bodies]. Shakaigaku Hyōron [Japanese Sociological Review], 43(1), 58–73.

Nishizaka, A. (2009). Katsudō no kūkanteki oyobi rensaiteki na soshikika: Hanashite to kikite no sōgo kōi saikō [The spatial and sequential organization of activity: Reconsidering the interaction between speakers and hearers]. Ninchikagaku [Cognitive Studies], 16(1), 65–77.

Nishizaka, A. (2010). Dōgu wo tsukau koto: shintai, kankyō, sōgokōi [Using tools: Body, environment, and interaction]. In S. Kushida & H. Yoshii (Eds.), Ethnomethodology wo manabu hito no tame ni [For Learners of Ethnomethodology] (pp. 36–57). Sekai Shisōsha.

Nishizaka, A. (2014). Sustained orientation to one activity in multiactivity during prenatal ultrasound examinations. In L. Mondada, J. Steensig, & J. Svennevig (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction (pp. 79–108). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.03nis

Nishizaka, A., & Okazawa, R. (2026). The synchronized instantiation of an ordered pair of instruction and instructed action. Language & Communication, 108, 1–16

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2026.02.005

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–2; G. Jefferson, Ed.). Blackwell.

Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge University Press.

Scheflen, A. E. (1973). Communicational structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Indiana University Press.

Schmidt, A. (2014). Spiel oder nicht Spiel? Zur interaktiven Organisation von Übergängen zwischen Spielwelt und Realwelt in Theaterproben. Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

Schmidt, A. (2018). Prefiguring the future: Projections and preparations within theatrical rehearsals. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources (pp. 231–260). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Schmidt, A. (2020). Transitionspraktiken in Theaterproben mit Fokus auf Interventionen. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, Themenheft: Instruktionen in Theater- und Orchesterproben, 190–237.

Schmidt, A., & Deppermann, A. (2023). On the emergence of routines: An interactional micro-history of rehearsing a scene. Human Studies, 46(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09655-1

Smart, N., & Szczepek Reed, B. (2025). Co-creation of activity spaces in an amateur dance group: Interactional construction of the teaching space. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1517858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1517858

Suzuki, M. (2023). Engeki no keiko bamen ni okeru engi no sōgokōiteki kōsei: Gendai engeki no kaiwa bunseki [The interactive construction of performances in contemporary theatrical rehearsal]. Nenpō Shakaigaku Ronshū, 36, 52–63.

https://doi.org/10.5690/kantoh.2023.52

Szczepek Reed, B., Reed, D., & Haddon, E. (2013). Now or not now: Coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753714

Yagi, J. (2026). The Moral Organization of Postural Readjustments in Edo-Bayashi. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v9i3.170737

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Suzuki, M. (2026). The Director’s Ways of Seeing: Embodied Participation in Japanese Theater Rehearsals. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v9i3.170883