Companions' Interventions on Behalf of Patients
Differences According to the Patient’s Capacities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i3.151571Keywords:
companions, health care encounters, patient's agency, conversation analysisAbstract
Some patients require a companion to help them answer questions from medical personnel. How the companions do so may depend, in part, on the nature of the patient’s condition. In the case of the patient with a learning disability, we find the companion tending strongly to respect the patient’s agency and entitlement to speak to their own experiences, by a) allowing the patient time to volunteer the answer to the question themselves, b) glossing inadequate answers as being a temporary failure to remember and c) constructing a no-problem answer (extending previous findings by Antaki and Chinn, 2019). In contrast, with a patient who is examined for or has a diagnosis of epilepsy or multiple sclerosis, we see the companion tending to take a more proactive and interventionist approach. We discuss our findings in the light of differences between the powers and capacities attributable to people with learning disability, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis, and the different entitlements that their companions may assume in speaking for them.
References
Antaki, C., & Chinn, D. (2019). Companions' dilemma of intervention when they mediate between patients with intellectual disabilities and health staff. Patient education and counseling, 102(11), 2024-2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.020
Antaki, C., Chinn, D., Walton, C., Finlay, W. M. L., & Sempik, J. (2020). To initiate repair or not? Coping with difficulties in the talk of adults with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(10-11), 954976. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1680734
Bagert, B., Camplair, P. & Bourdette, D. (2002). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: natural history, pathophysiology and management. CNS Drugs, 16(7): 445-455. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200216070-00002
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.
Chiaravallotti, N., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology, 7(12), 1139-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X
Chinn, D. (2022). ‘I Have to Explain to him’: How Companions Broker Mutual Understanding Between Patients with Intellectual Disabilities and Health Care Practitioners in Primary Care. Qualitative Health Research. 32(8-9):1215-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221089875
Department of Health. (2009). Valuing People Now: a new three-year strategy for people with learning disabilities. Department of Health, London. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.d h.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalass et/dh_093375.pdf
Doehring, A. H. (2018). Three-party interactions between neurologists, patients and their companions in the seizure clinic (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University).
Ford, J., & Reuber, M. (2023). Comparing Companion Involvement in Clinical Telephone and Face-To-Face Consultations About Seizures. Health Communication, 39(7), 1444–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2218143
Haakana, M. (2011). ”Mitä” (’what’) and other open class repair initiators in Finnish interactions. (translated title) Virittäjä, 115(1), 36-67. https://journal.fi/virittaja/article/view/4034
Hamann, M., & Nielsen, J. F. (2021). Social and moral relevance of memory: Knowing and remembering in conversations with a person with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 12(1), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.21982
Heller, V., Schönfelder, N., & Robbins, D. (2023). Displaying a critical stance: eyebrow movements in children’s multimodal oppositional actions. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(3). Special issue: Facial Gestures in Interaction. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i3.143027
Kangasharju, H. (1996), Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 26(3), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00051-8
Kesserling, J., Boyko, A., Laroni, A., Bharadia, T., van Galen, P., & Alexandri, N. (2022). Caregiver involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? Neurology and Therapy, 11(1), 9-20. Published online 2021 Nov 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4
Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13(2), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1993.13.2.213
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge university press.
Novak, A., Vizjak, K., & Rakusa, M. (2022). Cognitive impairment in people with epilepsy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(1), 267, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010267
Oelschlaeger M. L., Damico J. S. (1998). Joint productions as a conversational strategy in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(6), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985238
Peräkylä, A. (2012). Conversation analysis in psychotherapy. The handbook of conversation analysis, 551-574. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch27
Pino, M., & Land, V. (2022). How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(2), 395415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
Rapley, M. (2004). The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489884
Raymond, C. W. (2014a). Epistemic Brokering in the Interpreter-Mediated Medical Visit: Negotiating ‘Patient’s Side’ and ‘Doctor’s Side’ Knowledge, Research on language and social interaction, 47 (4), 426–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.958281
Raymond, C. W. (2014b). Conveying information in the interpreter-mediated medical visit: The case of epistemic brokering. Patient Education and Counseling, 97: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.020
Roberts, A., Townsend, S., Morris, J., Rushbrooke, E., Greenhill, B., Whitehead, R., ... & Golding, L. (2013). Treat me right, treat me equal: Using national policy and legislation to create positive changes in local health services for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12009
Robson, C., Drew, P., & Reuber, M. (2016). The role of companions in outpatient seizure clinic interactions: A pilot study. Epilepsy & Behavior, 60, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.04.010
Slowie, D., & Martin, G. (2014). Narrowing the health inequality gap by annual health checks for patients with intellectual disability. British Journal of General Practice, 64(619), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X677293
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911
Sorjonen, M-L. (2001). Responding in conversation. A study of response particles in Finnish. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified Repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in society, 35(3), 367-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258
Volkmer, A., Farrington-Douglas, C., Crutch, S., Beeke, S., Warren, J., & Yong, K. (2022). Better conversations: a language and communication intervention for aphasia in posterior cortical atrophy. Neurocase, 28(4), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2022.2125326
Webb, J. (2017). Conversation takes two: understanding interactions with people with dementia. Disability & society, 32(7), 1102-1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1321225
Yorkston, K.M., Baylor, C., & Amtmann, D. (2014). Communicative participation restrictions in multiple sclerosis: Associated variables and correlation with social functioning. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.05.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
