Towards a Multimodal Account of Post-Positioned Question Tags in Jordanian Arabic Conversation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v9i1.147094Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, interactional linguistics, multimodal communication, post-positioned tag questions (PPTQs), response pursuitsAbstract
This study explores the multimodal features of post-positioned question tags (PPQTs) and their temporal alignment, by using Conversation Analysis and interactional linguistics approaches. Data come from 20 hours of audio and video recordings of casual Jordanian Arabic conversations among 70 university students and graduates in Irbid City. By drawing on Jefferson (1981), Pomerantz (1984), and Stivers and Rossano (2010), the present microanalysis shows that PPQTs, such as sˤaħ? (‘right?’), together with specific nonverbal cues, pursue responses after an initial lack of uptake, while acknowledging their non-turn yielding functions.
References
Albanon, R. (2017). Gender and tag-questions in the Iraqi dialect. English Language, Literature & Culture, 2(6), 105-114.
Algeo, J. (1990). It's a myth innit? Politeness and the English tag question. In C. Ricks & L. Michaels (Eds.). The state of the language (pp. 443-450). University of California Press.
Al-Harahsheh, A. (2014). Language and gender differences in Jordanian spoken Arabic: A sociolinguistics perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 872-882.
Alharbi, B. (2017). The syntax of copular clauses in Arabic [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee]. Retrieved from https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1573/
Almaany. (n.d.). ṣaħ [صح]. Almaany Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-en/%D8%B5%D8%AD/
Alsaraireh, M. Y., Altakhaineh, A. R. M., & Khalifah, L. A. (2023). The use of question tags in Jordanian Arabic by Facebook users. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2261198
Ambrazaitis, G., & House, D. (2017). Multimodal prominences: Exploring the patterning and usage of focal pitch accents, head beats and eyebrow beats in Swedish television news readings. Speech Communication, 95, 100–113. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2017.08.008
Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.
Axelsson, K. (2011). Tag questions in fiction dialogue (Doctoral dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/24047
Bavelas, J. B., Gerwing, J., & Healing, S. (2014). Hand and facial gestures in conversational interaction. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 245-263). Oxford University Press.
Biezma, M., & Rawlins, K. (2012). Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 35(5), 361–406.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.3.09) [Computer software]. http://www.praat.org/
Borràs-Comes, J., Kaland, C., Prieto, P., & Swerts, M. (2014). Audiovisual correlates of interrogativity: A comparative analysis of Catalan and Dutch. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(1), 53-66.
Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1079-1098). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1098-1125). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19-46. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.03cal
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clift, R., & Rossi, G. (2023). Speaker eyebrow raises in the transition space: Pursuing a shared understanding. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i3.142897
Columbus, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of invariant tags in three varieties of English. English World-Wide, 31(3), 288–310. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.3.03col
Comrie, B., Haspelmath, M., & Bickel, B. (2015). Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2017). Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Stefani, E. (2021). Embodied Responses to Questions-in-Progress: Silent Nods as Affirmative Answers. Discourse Processes, 58(4), 353–371. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1836916
Ekman, P. (1979). About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In P. Ekman (Ed.). Human ethology (pp. 163–202).
ELAN (Version 6.7) [Computer software]. (2023). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Retrieved from https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Gísladóttir, R. S., Hoymann, G., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Magyari, L., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., Roque, L. S., & Torreira, F. (2013). Huh? What? – A first survey in twenty-one languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 343–380). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757464.012
Farag, R. (2019). Conversation-analytic transcription of Arabic-German talk-in-interaction. In Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 50). University of Szeged. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14232/wpcl.2019.2
Ferré, G. (2010). Timing relationships between speech and co-verbal gestures in spontaneous French. Language Resources and Evaluation, Workshop on Multimodal Corpora (pp. 86-91). Valetta, Malta.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Language in Society, 12(1), 89–92. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009647
Goodwin, C. (2000a). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis - An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.). Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157–182). London: Sage Publications.
Goodwin, C. (2000b). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.
Goodwin, C. (2010). Multimodality in human interaction. Calidoscópio, 8(2), 85-98. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2010.82.01
Gómez González, M.Á., & Dehé, N., (2020). The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations. Journal of Pragmatics, 158, 33–52.
Gómez González, M. Á., & Silvano, P. (2022). A functional model for the tag question paradigm: The case of invariable tag questions in English and Portuguese. Lingua, 272. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103255
Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555-568. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
Hellmuth, S., & Almbark, R. (2019). Intonational variation in Arabic Corpus 2011–2017 [Data collection]. UK Data Archive. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-852878
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Recipients designed: Tag questions and gender. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.). Conversation and gender (pp. 135–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
House, D. (2002). Perception of question intonation and facial gestures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1981). The abominable “ne?”: A working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response (Occasional Paper No.6). Manchester, England: University of Manchester, Department of Sociology.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jokipohja, A. K., & Lilja, N. (2022). Depictive Hand Gestures as Candidate Understandings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 55(2), 123–145. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2022.2067425
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 21-42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.006
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, K. H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 250. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12-32.
Kendrick, K. H., Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2023). Turn-taking in human face-to-face interaction is multimodal: Gaze direction and manual gestures aid the coordination of turn transitions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1875). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0473
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In I. Wachsmuth & M. Fröhlich (Eds.). Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction. GW 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 1371, pp. 23-35). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986
Ladewig, S. H. (2010). Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern: Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste. Sprache und Literatur, 41(1), 89-111.
Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6.
Ladewig, S. H. (2014). The cyclic gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.). Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605-1618). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ladewig, S. H. (2020). Integrating gestures: The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ladewig, S. H. (2024). Recurrent gestures: Cultural, individual, and linguistic dimensions of meaning-making. In A. Cienki (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of gesture studies (pp. 32-55). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051
Lempert, M. (2017). Uncommon resemblance: Pragmatic affinity in political gesture. Gesture, 16(1), 35-67. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.02lem
Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.). The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101-130). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Loehr, D. P. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7, 179–214.
Marmorstein, M. (2024). Request for confirmation sequences in Egyptian Arabic. Open Linguistics, 10(1), 20240009. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2024-0009
McIlvenny, P. (2022). Guide for DOTE users. Software documentation, Github Docs. Retrieved from https://bigsoftvideo.github.io/DOTE/
McIlvenny, P. (2024). Guide for DOTEbase Users. Software documentation, Github Docs. Retrieved from https://bigsoftvideo.github.io/DOTEbase/
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mithun, M. (2012). Tags: Cross-linguistic diversity and commonality. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2165–2182. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.010
Mondada, L. (2013). Multimodal interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.). Body – language – communication (pp. 577-589). De Gruyter Mouton.
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85-106.
Mortensen, K. (2016). The Body as a Resource for Other-Initiation of Repair: Cupping the Hand Behind the Ear. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 34–57. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126450
Murphy, I. (2014). The realization of negation in the Syrian Arabic clause, phrase, and word [Master’s thesis, Trinity College Dublin].
Nota, N., Trujillo, J. P., & Holler, J. (2021). Facial signals and social actions in multimodal face-to-face interaction. Brain Sciences, 11(8), 1017. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11081017
Nota, N., Trujillo, J. P., & Holler, J. (2023). Conversational eyebrow frowns facilitate question identification: An online study using virtual avatars. Cognitive Science, 47(12). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13392
Novick, D. G., & Sutton, S. (1994). An empirical model of acknowledgment for spoken-language systems. In 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 96–101). Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Oloff, F. (2018). “Sorry?”/”Como?”/”Was?”—Open class and embodied repair initiators in international workplace interactions. J. Pragmat. 126, 29–51.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.). Structures of social action (pp. 152-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Rando, E. (1980). Intonation in discourse. In L. Waugh & C. van Schooneveld (Eds.). The melody of language (pp. 243-278). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Reese, B., & Asher, N. (2007). Prosody and the interpretation of tag questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, 448-462.
Rochet-Capellan, A., Laboissière, R., Galván, A., & Schwartz, J. L. (2008). The speech focus position effect on jaw–finger coordination in a pointing task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1507–1521.
Rohrer, P. (2022). A temporal and pragmatic analysis of gesture-speech association: A corpus-based approach using the novel MultiModal MultiDimensional (M3D) labeling system [Doctoral dissertation, Nantes Université; Universitat Pompeu Fabra]. Retrieved from https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03994053
Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning, and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 187-249). Cambridge University Press.
Ruth-Hirrel, L. (2018). A construction-based approach to cyclic gesture functions in English and Farsi [Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico]. University of New Mexico Digital Repository. Retrieved from Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/57/
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Sailor, C. (2009). Tagged for deletion: A typological approach to VP ellipsis in tag questions [Master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles].
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–586.
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
Selting, M. (1998). TCUs and TRPs: The construction of ‘units’ in conversational talk. Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 4, 1–48.
Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2219-2239.
Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture [Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen]. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17617/2.59337
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 2005(156), 1-20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
Stivers, T., & Robinson, J.D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367-392.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K. E., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587–10592. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258
Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154-186. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662
Stukenbrock, A. (2018). Forward-looking: Where do we go with multimodal projections? In A. Depperman & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 31–68). John Benjamins.
Swerts, M. G. J., & Krahmer, E. J. (2010). Visual prosody of newsreaders: Effects of information structure, emotional content and intended audience on facial expressions. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 197-206.
ter Bekke, M., Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2024). Hand gestures have predictive potential during conversation: An investigation of the timing of gestures in relation to speech. Cognitive Science, 48(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13407
Tomaselli, M.V., & Gatt, A. (2015). Italian tag questions and their conversational functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 84, 54-82.
Torreira, F., & Valtersson, E. (2015). Phonetic and visual cues to questionhood in French conversation. Phonetica, 72(2), 81-106. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1159/000381723
Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(4), 283–311.
Tsai, N. (2019). A multimodal analysis of tag questions in Mandarin Chinese multi-party conversation. In X. Li & T. Ono (Eds.). Multimodality in Chinese interaction (pp. 300-332). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Wagner, P., Malisz, Z., & Kopp, S. (2014). Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview. Speech Communication, 57, 209–232. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008
Walker, M. B., & Trimboli, C. (1982). Smooth transitions in conversational interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(2), 305–306. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9713444
Yang, W. (2015). A study of the interactional function of the tag question Dui Bu Dui in Mandarin conversation from a multimodal perspective [Master’s thesis, University of Alberta].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
