Moving Towards (and Away From) Possible Discussions About Dying
Emergent Outcomes of Companions’ Actions in Hospice Consultations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i3.144611Keywords:
companions, conversation analysis, end of life care, hospice, palliative careAbstract
The article examines a corpus of palliative care interactions recorded in a large UK hospice. It focuses on a collection of patient possible allusions to disease progression and end of life and examines their companions’ (i.e., accompanying family members and friends) subsequent actions. These actions implement various interactional projects that are coherent with the sequence of actions and broader activity underway. They share the outcome that they steer the interaction away from the possibility of immediately elaborating on the patient’s allusion, and of making matters related to disease progression or end of life explicit (despite these being relevant possibilities).
References
Alftberg, A., Ahlstrom, G., Nilsen, P., Behm, L., Sandgren, A., Benzein, E., Wallerstedt, B., & Rasmussen, B. H. (2018). Conversations about death and dying with older people: An ethnographic study in nursing homes. Healthcare, 6(2), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6020063
Anderson, R. J., Stone, P. C., Low, J. T. S., & Bloch, S. (2021). Transitioning out of prognostic talk in discussions with families of hospice patients at the end of life: A conversation analytic study. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(5), 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.009
Brighton, L. J., & Bristowe, K. (2016). Communication in palliative care: Talking about the end of life, before the end of life. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 92(1090), 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133368
Chaturvedi, S. K., Loiselle, C. G., & Chandra, P. S. (2009). Communication with relatives and collusion in palliative care: A cross-cultural perspective. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 15(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.53485
Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35(4), 398-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/800594
Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495-522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020200
Egbert, N., Child, J. T., Lin, M. C., Savery, C., & Bosley, T. (2017). How older adults and their families perceive family talk about aging-related EOL issues: A dialectical analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020021
Ekberg, S., Danby, S., Rendle-Short, J., Herbert, A., Bradford, N. K., & Yates, P. (2019). Discussing death: Making end of life implicit or explicit in paediatric palliative care consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(2), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.014
Enfield, N. J. & Sidnell, J. (2017). The Concept of Action. Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.
Hancock, K., Clayton, J. M., Parker, S. M., Wall Der, S., Butow, P. N., Carrick, S., Currow, D., Ghersi, D., Glare, P., Hagherty, R., & Tattersall, M. H. (2007). Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 21(6), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216307080823
Harris, D. (2009). Oppression of the bereaved: A critical analysis of grief in Western society. Omega-Journal of Death and Dying, 60(3), 241-253. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.60.3.c
Hospice UK. (2023). Dying Matters. Retrieved 30/05/2023, from https://www.hospiceuk.org/our-campaigns/dying-matters
Impermanence (n.d.). Death Cafe. Retrieved 30/05/2023, from https://deathcafe.com
Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In V. D'Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Cleup Editore.
Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 4, 418-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/800595
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13-23). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a 'troubles-telling' and a 'service encounter'. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 521-548). Cambridge University Press.
Jimenez, G., Tan, W. S., Virk, A. K., Low, C. K., Car, J., & Ho, A. H. Y. (2018). Overview of systematic reviews of advance care planning: Summary of evidence and global lessons. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 56(3), 436-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016
Kang, Y. J. (2021). Why are dying individuals stigmatized and socially avoided? Psychological explanations. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 17(4), 317-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2021.1930330
Keeley, M. P. (2017). Family communication at the end of life. Behavioral Sciences, 7(3), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7030045
Kellas, J. K., Castle, K. M., Johnson, A., & Cohen, M. Z. (2017). Communicatively constructing the bright and dark sides of hope: Family caregivers' experiences during end of life cancer care. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), Article 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020033
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership. (2021). Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: A national framework for local action 2021-2026. Retrieved 30/05/2023, from https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/ambitions-for-palliative-and-end-of-life-care-a-national-framework-for-local-action-2021-2026/
Parker S. M., Clayton J. M., Hancock K., Walder S., Butow P. N., Carrick S., et al. (2007). A systematic review of Prognostic/End-of-Life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: Patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaisymman.2006.09.035
Pino, M., & Jenkins, L. (2024). Inviting the patient to talk about a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner: A way of promoting discussion about disease progression and end of life in palliative care interactions. Health Communication, 39(4), 778-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2185579
Pino, M., & Land, V. (2022). How companions speak on patients’ behalf without undermining their autonomy: Findings from a conversation analytic study of palliative care consultations Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(2), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13427
Pino, M., Doehring, A., & Parry, R. (2021). Practitioners' dilemmas and strategies in decision-making conversations where patients and companions take divergent positions on a healthcare measure: An observational study using conversation analysis. Health Communication, 36(14), 2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1813952
Pino, M., Parry, R., Land, V., Faull, C., Feathers, L., & Seymour, J. (2016). Engaging terminally ill patients in end of life talk: How experienced palliative medicine doctors navigate the dilemma of promoting discussions about dying. Plos One, 11(5), e0156174, Article e0156174. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156174
Planalp, S., & Trost, M. R. (2008). Communication issues at the end of life: Reports from hospice volunteers. Health Communication, 23(3), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802055331
Pollock, K., Bulli, F., Caswel, G., Kodba-Ceh, H., Lunder, U., Miccinesi, G., Seymour, J., Toccafondi, A., van Delden, J. J. M., Zwakman, M., Rietjiens, J., van der Heide, A., & Kars, M. (2022). Patient and family caregiver perspectives of Advance Care Planning: Qualitative findings from the ACTION cluster randomised controlled trial of an adapted respecting choices intervention. Mortality, 29(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2022.2107424
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 325–345). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161-216. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2782190
Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, C., Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2013). Having the last laugh: On post-completion laughter particles. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of Laughter in Interaction (pp. 91-106). Bloomsbury.
Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 77–99). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch5
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Swetenham, K., Tieman, J., Butow, P., & Currow, D. (2015). Communication differences when patients and caregivers are seen separately or together. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 21(11), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.11.557
Weiste, E. (2015). Describing therapeutic projects across sequences: Balancing between supportive and disagreeing interventions. Journal of Pragmatics, 80, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
