Navigating Between On-Screen Activities and Discussion
Multiactivity in Video-Mediated B2B Sales Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v7i4.143519Keywords:
sales interaction, multiactivity, PowerPoint presentation, multimodal conversation analysis, video-mediated interactionAbstract
This study examines multiactivity in video-mediated business-to-business sales encounters. By drawing on multimodal conversation analysis, the paper examines how representatives of a legal service company navigate between talk-in-interaction with prospective clients and operating with a presentation on a shared screen where the sold service is demonstrated. The findings show how the technological affordances of MS Teams and PowerPoint are used to coordinate the presentation-orientation and prospect-orientation in a complex digital-social environment in order to display engagement in multiple technological and social actions simultaneously. The paper contributes, firstly, to the field of B2B sales interaction by showing how technology transforms the meetings into arenas of multiactivity, where the presenter has to navigate between their on-screen actions and their remote co-participants. Secondly, the paper contributes to the field of video-mediated interaction by illustrating how technological affordances are used to maintain both the progressivity and interactivity of the video-mediated meeting.
References
Arminen, I., C. Licoppe & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49 (4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
Arvedsen, L. D. & Hassert, L. O. (2020). Accomplishing leadership-in-interaction by mobilizing available information and communication technology objects in a virtual context. Leadership 16(5), 546 - 567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020917819
Balaman, U. & Pekarek Doehler, S., (2022). Navigating the complex social ecology of screen-based activity in video-mediated interaction. Pragmatics 32(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20023.bal
Brown, B. (2004). The order of service: the practical management of customer interaction. Sociological Research Online, 9, 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.973
De Stefani, E., (2018). Institutional invitations to a meeting: Cold calls to bank clients. Journal of Pragmatics 125, 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.011
De Stefani, E. & Horlacher, A-S., (2018). Mundane talk at work: Multiactivity in interactions between professionals and their clientele. Discourse Studies 20(2), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734935
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R. & Mondada, L., (2010). Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 1700–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006
Due, B. & Licoppe, C., (2020). Video-Mediated Interaction (VMI): Introduction to a special issue on the multimodal accomplishment of VMI institutional activities. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3(3), https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.123836
Gardner, R. & Levy, M. (2010). The coordination of talk and action in the collaborative construction of a multimodal text. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 2189–2203.
Geiger, S. & Kelly, S., (2014). Sales-as-practice: an introduction and methodological outline. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 34(3), 223–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2014.913972
Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text & Talk, 21(1–2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.187
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L. & Nevile, M., (2014). Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon. In: Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., and Nevile M. (Eds.), Multiacitivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins, pp. 191–223.
Heath, C., & Luff, P., (1992). Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 7(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0703_3
Heinonen, P., Niemi, J. & Kaski, T., (2021). Changing participation in web conferencing: the shared computer screen as an online sales interaction resource. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0056
Humă, B., Stokoe, E. & Sikveland, R.O., 2020. Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context, Qualitative Research in Psychology 17(3), 357–371, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1725947
Humă, B. & Stokoe, E., (2020). The Anatomy of First-Time and Subsequent Business-to-Business “Cold” Calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(2), 271–294, https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739432
Humă, B. & Stokoe, E., (2023). Resistance in Business-to-Business “Cold” Sales Calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42(5–6), 630-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231185520
Hutchby I., (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2): 441–456.
Jefferson, G., (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.
Kaski, T., Niemi, J. & Pullins, E., (2018a). Rapport building in authentic B2B sales interaction. Industrial Marketing Management 69, 235–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.019
Kaski, T., Niemi, J. & Pullins, E., (2018b). Building customer trust in technology-mediated online B2B sales encounters. In: D. Gal, K. Hewett, and S. Jayachandran (Eds.), Proceedings of 2018 AMA Summer Academic Conference, 29, pp. ss05–ss10.
Knoblauch, H. (2008). The Performance of Knowledge: Pointing and Knowledge in Powerpoint Presentations. Cultural Sociology 2(1), 75 - 97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975507086275
Llewellyn, N., & Burrow, R. (2008). Streetwise sales and the social order of city streets. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 561–583.
Licoppe, C. & Morel, J., (2012). Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K. & Oyama, S., (2003). Fractured Ecologies: Creating Environments for Collaboration. Human–Computer Interaction 18(12), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3
Melander Bowden, H. & Svahn, J. (2020). Collaborative work on an online platform in video-mediated homework support. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.122600
Mondada, L., Sorjonen, M-L. & Fox, B., (2023). Encounters at the counter: An introduction. In: Fox, B., Mondada, L., and Sorjonen, M-L. (Eds.), Encounters at the counter: The Organization of Shop Interactions. Cambridge University Press, 1 - 36.
Mondada, L., (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity: Operating and demonstrating in the surgical theatre. In: P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, and M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiacitivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins, pp. 191–223.
Mondada, L., (2016). Challenges of multi-modality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3), 336-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
Mondada, L., (2022). Conventions for Transcribing Multimodality. Version 6.0.1. Available from: https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription
Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Niemi, J., Pullins, E. & Kaski, T., (2021). Decision-making in salesperson–customer interaction Establishing a common ground for obtaining commitment. In: J. Lindström, R. Laury, A. Peräkylä, and M-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in Language and Social Interaction. John Benjamins, 164 - 181.
Nissi, R. & Lehtinen, E., (2016). Negotiation of expertise and multifunctionality: PowerPoint presentations as interactional activity types in workplace meetings. Language and Communication 48, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.003
Oittinen, T. (2018). Multimodal accomplishment of alignment and affiliation in the local space of distant meetings. Culture & Organization 24(1), 31 - 53.
Oittinen, T., (2023). Highlighting as a referential and collaborative practice in multiparty video-mediated learning activities. Classroom discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2259020
Olbertz-Siitonen, M. & Piirainen-Marsh, A., (2021). Coordinating action in technology-supported shared tasks: Virtual pointing as a situated practice for mobilizing a response. Language and Communication 79, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.03.005
Rendle-Short, J., (2006). The academic presentation. Situated talk in action. Ashgate.
Ruusuvuori, J. (2001). Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine 52, 1093 - 1108.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8, 289–327.
Sorjonen, M-L., (2017). Imperatives and responsiveness in Finnish conversations. In: Sorjonen, M-L., Raevaara, L. and E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative turns at talk: The design of directives in action. John Benjamins, pp. 241–270.
Ticca, A.C., (2014). Managing multiactivity in a travel agency: Making phone calls while interacting with customers. In: Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., and Nevile M. (Eds.), Multiacitivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. John Benjamins, pp. 191–223.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
