Displaying a Critical Stance
Eyebrow Contractions in Children’s Multimodal Oppositional Actions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i3.143027Keywords:
facial expression, eyebrow movement, opposition, critical stance, affective stanceAbstract
This study examines eyebrow contractions within processes of argumentative decision-making in children’s interaction. Based on a collection of 23 instances, we examine this subtle resource in two oppositional actions: contradicting and putting something into question. We describe how eyebrow contractions are combined with other facial (e.g. nose wrinkling, squinting/opening the eyes, gaze aversion/confrontational gaze), bodily and verbal and prosodic resources to display a critical stance. The analysis demonstrates that the two oppositional actions are accomplished through distinct clusters of resources, which either mitigate or increase their confrontational import. Multimodal displays of critical stance thus vary from mildly critical to reproachful-critical and ironic-critical and contribute in different ways to the interactive trajectory of decision-making.
References
Andries, F., Meissl, K., de Vries, C., Feyaerts, K., Oben, B., Sambre, P., Verme-erbergen, M., & Brône, G. (2023). Multimodal stance-taking in interaction – A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication, 8:1187977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
Auer, P. (2017). Gaze, addressee selection and turn-taking in three-party in-teraction. Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 60, 1–32.
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Healing, S. (2014). Including facial gestures in ges-ture-speech ensembles. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance. Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 15–34). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brumark, Å. (2008). ‘‘Eat your Hamburger!’’—‘‘No, I don’t Want to!’’. Argumen-tation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conver-sation in Twenty Swedish Families. Argumentation, 22, 251–271.
Cekaite, A. (2012). Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society, 41, 641–670.
Chovil, N. (1991). Discourse‐oriented facial displays in conversation. Re-search on Language and Social Interaction, 25(1) 163–194.
Ciolek, T. M., & Kendon, A. (1980). Environment and the Spatial Arrangement of Conversational Encounters. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 237–271.
Clift, R. (2021). Embodiment in Dissent: The Eye Roll as an Interactional Prac-tice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(3), 261–276.
Cook, H. M. (2014). Language socialization and stance-taking practices. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs & B.B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The handbook of language so-cialization (pp. 296–321). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. The case of new beginnings. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York: Philosophical Library.
Du Bois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 433–451.
Egbert, M. (1993). Schisming: The Transformation from a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations. Dissertation. University of California Los Ange-les.
Ekman, P. (1979). About brows: emotional and conversational signals. In M. van Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds.), Human Ethology (pp. 169–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ekman, P. (2007). Emotions Revealed. New York: Henry Holt.
Feyaerts, K., Rominger, Ch., Feyaerts, K., Rominger, Ch., Lackner, H.K., Brône, G., Jehoul, A., Oben, B., Papousek, I. (2022). In your face? Exploring mul-timodal response patterns involving facial responses to verbal and ges-tural stance-taking expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 190, 6–17.
Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Hellermann, J. (2004). “Getting past no”: Sequence, action and sound production in the projection of no-initiated turns. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation (pp. 233–269). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experi-ence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interac-tion. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the ac-tivity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1-2), 51–75.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children's arguing. In: S. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective (pp. 200–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said. Talk as social organisation among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2001). Emotion within Situated Activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader (pp. 239–257). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goodwin, M, H., & Alim, H. S. (2010). “Whatever (Neck Roll, Eye Roll, Teeth Suck)”. The Situated Coproduction of Social Categories and Identities through Stancetaking and Transmodal Stylization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 179–194.
Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as Stance. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, M.H.; Cekaite, A. (2018): Embodied family choreography. Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. London: Routledge.
Haddington, P. (2006). The organization of gaze and assessments as re-sources for stance taking. Text & Talk, 26(3), 281–328.
Heller, V. (2018). Embodying epistemic responsibility. The interplay of gaze and stance-taking in children's collaborative reasoning. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 2(2), 262–285.
Heller, V. (2021). Embodied Displays of “Doing Thinking.” Epistemic and Inter-active Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activi-ties. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:636671, 1–21.
Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hos-tile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1427–1446.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epis-temic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychol-ogy Quarterly 68(1),15–38.
Hübscher, I., Vincze, L., & Prieto, P. (2019). Children’s signaling of their uncer-tain knowledge state: prosody, face and body cues come first. Language, Learning and Development, 15(4), 366-389.
Huisman, M. (2001). Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction. Inter-national Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 69–90.
Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Iwasaki, S. (2015). Collaboratively organized stancetaking in Japanese: Shar-ing and negotiating stance within the turn constructional unit. Journal of Pragmatics, 83, 104–119.
Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86–105.
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2014). Foreshadowing a prob-lem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 132–147.
Kendon, A. (1973). The role of visible behavior in the organization of social interaction. In M. Cranach & I. Vine (Eds.), Social Communication and Movement: Studies of Interaction and Expression in Man and Chimpan-zee (pp. 29-74). New York: Academic Press.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response prefer-ence in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 12–32.
Kidwell, M. (2006). “Calm down!”: The role of gaze in the interactional man-agement of hysteria by the police. Discourse Studies, 8(6), 745-770.
Klein, W., & Miller, M. (1981). Moral argumentation among children. A case study. Linguistische Berichte, 74(81), 1–19.
Koshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51–77.
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Every-day Interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and Concession in Disputes. On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures. Language in Society, 22(2), 193–216.
Kreuz, J., & Luginbühl, M. (2020). From flat propositions to deep co-constructed and modalized argumentations: Oral argumentative skills among elementary-school children from grades 2 to 6. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4, 93–114.
Kyratzis, A., Ross, T. S., & Kroymen, S. B. (2010). Validating justifications in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk: Implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. Journal of Child Language, 37, 115–144.
Lebrun, C. (1734/1980). A Method to Learn to Design the Passions Proposed in a Conference on the General and Particular Expression, etc. Translat-ed by John Williams. Los Angeles: Augustan Reprint Society, Publication Numbers 200-201.
Li, X. (2021). Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate mat-ters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics, 7(1), 549–568.
Maynard, D. W. (1986). Offering and soliciting collaboration in multi-party dis-putes among children (and other humans). Human Studies, 9, 261–285.
Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156.
Mondada, L. (2015). The facilitator's task of formulating citizens' proposals in political meetings: Orchestrating multiple embodied orientations to recip-ients. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 16, 1–62.
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interac-tion. Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language Social Interaction, 51, 85–106.
Mundwiler, V., & Kreuz, J. (2018). Collaborative Decision-Making in Argumen-tative Group Discussions Among Primary School Children. In S. Oswald, T. Herman, & J. Jacquin (Eds.), Argumentation and Language — Linguis-tic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations (pp. 263–285). Cham: Spring-er.
Oloff, F. (2020): "Hm? He? Hä? - Some Embodied Features of Open Class Repair Initiation in Spoken German [talk]," in International Workshop "Fa-cial Gestures in Interaction" (Bayreuth, Germany).
Quasthoff, U., Heller, V., & Morek, M. (2017). On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction. An analytic framework. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 84–110.
Rossi, G. (2020): Other-repetition in conversation across languages: Bringing prosody into pragmatic typology. Language in Society, 49, 495–520.
Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and Verbal Expressions in As-sessing Stories and Topics. Research on Language and Social Interac-tion, 42(4), 377–394.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schönfelder, N., & Heller, V. (2019). Embodied reciprocity in conversational argumentation. Soliciting and giving reasons with Palm Up Open Hand gestures. Proceedings of the 6th Gesture and Speech in Interaction GESPIN, 81–86.
Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style – with special focus on the prosodic signaling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3), 375–408.
Selting, M. (1995). Prosodie im Gespräch. Aspekte einer interaktionalen Pho-nologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Selting, M. et al. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. translated and adapted for English by E. Couper-Kuhlen and D. Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Inter-aktion, 12, 1–51.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic Conversation Analytic Methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Sti-vers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Spranz-Fogasy, T. (1986). „widersprechen“. Zu Form und Funktion eines Akti-vitätstyps in Schlichtungsgesprächen. Eine gesprächsanalytische Unter-suchung. Tübingen: Narr.
Steensig, J., & Drew, P. (2008). Introduction: Questioning and affiliati-on/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 5–15.
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321.
Stevanovic, M. (2012). Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Stud-ies, 14(6), 779–803.
Stevanovic, M. (2013). Constructing a proposal as a thought. A way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace in-teraction. Pragmatics, 23(3), 519–544.
Stivers, T. (2002). Participating in decisions about treatment: overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1111–1130.
Stivers, T., Heritage, J., Barnes, R. K., McCabe, R., Thompson, L., & Toerien, M. (2018). Treatment Recommendations as Actions. Health Communica-tion, 33(11), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1350913.
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2016). Proposals for Activity Collaboration. Research on Children in Social Interaction, 49(2), 148–166.
Streeck, J. (2007). Geste und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeu-tungswandel der „bietenden Hand“. In H. Hausendorf (Eds.), Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit in verbaler Interaktion (pp. 155–177). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Streeck, J. (2009). Forward-Gesturing. Discourse Processes 46(2-3), 161–179.
Stukenbrock, A. (2018). Forward-looking. Where do we go with multimodal projections? In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in Embodied In-teraction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources (pp. 31–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tainio, L. (2012). Prosodic imitation as a means of receiving and displaying a critical stance in classroom interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 547–568.
Tracy, K., & Robles, J. (2009). Questions, questioning, and institutional prac-tices: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 11(2), 131–152.
Waring, H. Z. (2012). Yes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the lan-guage classroom. Language and Education, 26(5), 451–469.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
