The local and filmed accountability of sensorial practices

The intersubjectivity of touch as an interactional achievement

Authors

  • Lorenza Mondada University of Basel
  • Sofian A. Bouaouina University of Basel
  • Laurent Camus University of Basel
  • Guillaume Gauthier University of Basel
  • Hanna Svensson University of Basel
  • Burak S. Tekin University of Basel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128160

Keywords:

social interaction, EMCA, video, sensoriality, intersubjectivity, accountability, videographability

Abstract

This paper contributes to a multimodal EMCA approach to sensoriality and to a reflection about how video can support it. First, it discusses how the intersubjectivity and accountability of sensorial practices are locally and endogenously achieved by and for the participants. This accountability is implemented through various multimodal resources, which make sensorial practices accessible for the co-participants. Second, it shows how the visual, verbal and sometimes co-tactile orientations of the participants are also the very basis on which researchers and other professionals build the videographability of the activity. The paper articulates these two aspects by studying activities dealing with food, in which the participants engage in touching food as a relevant sensorial practice within their ongoing course of action.

References

Avital, Sharon & Streeck, Jürgen (2011). Terra Incognita: Social interaction among blind children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 169-181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Broth, Mathias (2009). Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1998-2016.

Broth, Mathias; Laurier, Eric & Mondada, Lorenza (2014). Studies of Video Practices. London: Routledge.

Camus, Laurent (in press). Le problème de la fidélité au réel. Moralité et réflexivité dans la réalisation du football. Télévision, 12.

Cekaite, Asta (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30-42.

Cekaite, Asta & Mondada, Lorenza (2020). Touch in Social Interaction: Touch, Language and Body. London: Routledge.

Deppermann, Arnulf (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 1-7.

Egbert, Maria & Deppermann, Arnulf (2012). Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technology. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

Fele, Giolo (2016). Il paradosso del gusto. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 7(14): 151-174.

Fele, Giolo (2019). Olfactory objects: Recognizing, describing and assessing smells during professional tasting sessions. In D. Day & J. Wagner (Eds.), Objects, bodies and work practices (pp. 250-284). Bristol: Multilingual Matters,

Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Gibson, James J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69(6), 477-491.

Gibson, Will & vom Lehn, Dirk, (Eds.) (2021). Special issue on the senses and social interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1).

Goodwin, Charles (2017). Co-operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles & Smith, Michael Sean. (2020). Calibrating professional perception thorugh touch in geological fieldwork. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in Social Interaction: Touch, Language and Body (pp. 269-287). London: Routledge.

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction (pp. 73-102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haddington, Pentti; Mondada, Lorenza & Nevile, Maurice (2013). Interaction and Mobility. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Heath, Christian; Hindmarsh, Jon & Luff, Paul (2010). Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Howes, David & Classen, Constance (2014). Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. London: Routledge.

Iwasaki, Shimako; Bartlett, Meredith; Manns, Howard & Willoughby, Louisa (2019). The challenges of multimodality and multi-sensoriality: Methodological issues in analyzing tactile signed interaction, Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 215-227.

Jayyusi, Lena (1988). Toward a socio-logic of the film text. Semiotica, 68(3-4), 271-296.

Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jefferson, Gail (2017). Repairing the Broken Surface of Talk. Managing Problems in Speaking, Hearing, and Understanding in Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kreplak, Yaël & Mondémé, Chloé (2014). Artworks as touchable objects. Guiding perception in a museum tour for blind people. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with Objects (pp. 295-317). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

LaBonte, Andrew; Hindmarsh, Jon & vom Lehn, Dirk (2021). Data collection at height: Embodied competence, multisensoriality and video-based research in an extreme context of work. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).

Liberman, Kenneth (2013). More Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: State University of New York Press.

Merlino, Sara (2021). Making sounds visible in speech-language therapy for aphasia. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).

Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Video Recording as the Reflexive Preservation and Configuration of Phenomenal Features for Analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner & B. Schnetter (Eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods (pp. 51-68). Berlin: Lang.

Mondada, Lorenza (2012). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 32-56). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mondada, Lorenza (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137-156.

Mondada, Lorenza (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(2), 2-32.

Mondada, Lorenza (2018a). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction. Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85-106.

Mondada, Lorenza (2018b). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743-769.

Mondada, Lorenza (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47-62.

Mondada, Lorenza (2020a). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140-163.

Mondada, Lorenza (2020b). Sensorial explorations of food: How professionals and amateurs touch products in shops. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in social interaction: Touch, Language and Body. London: Routledge.

Mondada, Lorenza (2021). Sensing in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mondada, Lorenza & Tekin, Burak S. (2020). Arranging bodies for photographs: Professional touch in the photography studio. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(1).

Mortensen, Kristian & Wagner, Johannes (2019). Inspection sequences. Multisensorial inspections of unfamiliar objects. Gesprächsforschung, 20, 399-343.

Nevile, Maurice (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121-151.

Nevile, Maurice; Haddington, Pentti; Heinemann, Trine & Rauniomaa, Mirka (2014). Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nishizaka, Aug (2016). Syntactical constructions and tactile orientations: Procedural utterances and procedures in massage therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 98, 18-35.

Raymond, Geoffrey (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939-967.

Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2016). Accountability in Social Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Streeck, Jürgen; Goodwin, Charles & LeBaron, Curtis (2011). Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

vom Lehn, Dirk (2010). Discovering ‘experience-ables’: Socially including visually impaired people in art museums. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7-8), 749-769.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-12

How to Cite

Mondada, L., Bouaouina, S. A., Camus, L., Gauthier, G., Svensson, H., & Tekin, B. S. (2021). The local and filmed accountability of sensorial practices: The intersubjectivity of touch as an interactional achievement. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128160