“More than meets the eye”
Accessing senses in social interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128152Abstract
NA
References
Aare, K., Włodarczak, M., & Heldner, M. (2019). Breath holds in spontaneous speech. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 10(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2019.10.1.01
Fele, G., & Liberman, K. (2021). Some Discovered Practices of Lay Coffee Drinkers. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.486
Gan, Y. (2021). Capturing love at a distance: Multisensoriality in intimate video calls between migrant parents and their left-behind children. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkeim’s aphorism (A. W. Rawls, Ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 272–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. Routledge.
Heath, C. (1989). Pain Talk: The Expression of Suffering in the Medical Consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786911
Heath, C. C. (1982). The display of recipiency: An instance of a sequential relationship in speech and body movement. 42(2–4), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1982.42.2-4.147
Hofstetter, E., Keevallik, L., & Löfgren, A. (2021). Suspending syntax: Bodily strain and progressivity in talk. Frontiers in Communication.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Psychology Press.
Jenkings, K. N. (2017). Rock climbers’ communicative and sensory practices: Routine intercorporeality between climbers, rock, and auxiliary technologies. In C. Meyer & U. v. Wedelstaedt (Eds.), Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports (Vol. 8, pp. 149–172). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.8.06jen
Katila, J., & Turja, T. (2021). Capturing the nurse’s kinesthetic experience of wearing an exoskeleton: The benefits of using intercorporeal perspective to video-analysis. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
Keevallik, L. (in press). Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistic Vanguard.
Kuroshima, S., & Ivarsson, J. (2021). Toward a praxeological account of performing surgery: Overcoming methodological and technical constraints. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
La, J., & Weatherall, A. (2020). Pain displays as embodied activity in medical interactions. In S. Wiggins & K. O. Cromdal (Eds.), Discursive Psychology and Embodiment: Beyond Subject-Object Binaries (pp. 197–220). Springer Nature.
LaBonte, A., Hindmarsh, J., & vom Lehn, D. (2021). Data collection at height: Embodied competence, multisensoriality and video-based research in an extreme context of work. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
Merlino, S. (2021). Making sounds visible in speech-language therapy for aphasia. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
Meyer, C., & v. Wedelstaedt, U. (Eds.). (2017). Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports. John Benjamins.
Mondada, L. (2018). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618793439
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
Mondada, L., Bouaouina, S. A., Camus, L., Gauthier, G., Svensson, H., & Tekin, B. S. (2021). The local and filmed accountability of sensorial practices: The intersubjectivity of touch as an interactional acheivement. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3).
Nevile, M. (2015). The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
Nishizaka, A. (2017). The Perceived Body and Embodied Vision in Interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1296465
Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. Sage.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745
Schegloff, E. A. (2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 357–406). Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. S. (2021). Achieving mutual accessibility through the coordination of multiple perspectives in open, unstructured landscapes. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 4(3).
Stevanovic, M., Himberg, T., Niinisalo, M., Kahri, M., Peräkylä, A., Sams, M., & Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality, Mutual Visibility, and Behavioral Matching: Body Sway and Pitch Register During Joint Decision Making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 33–53.
Streeck, J. (2003). The body taken for granted: Lingering dualism in research on social interaction. In P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, J. S. Mandelbaum, & R. Hopper (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 427–440). Erlbaum.
Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010
Stukenbrock, A., & Dao, A. N. (2019). Joint Attention in Passing: What Dual Mobile Eye Tracking Reveals About Gaze in Coordinating Embodied Activities at a Market. In E. Reber & C. Gerhardt (Eds.), Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space (pp. 177–213). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97325-8_6
Sudnow, D. (1993). Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. MIT Press.
Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00284
Weatherall, Ann, Leelo Keevallik, Jessica La, Maria Stubbe, Tony Dowell (2021) The multimodality and temporality of pain displays. Language and Communication, 80, 56–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
