Researcher participation, ethics, and cameras in the field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i2.127215Abstract
NA
References
Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text and Talk, 30(1), 1-25.
Cekaite, A. (2012). Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn. Language in Society, 41, 641-670.
Chen, R. (2021). The researcher’s participant roles in ethical data collection of autistic interaction. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Edmonds. R. (2021) Balancing research goals and community expectations: The affordances of body cameras and participant observation in the study of wildlife conservation. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Goico, S. (2021) The participation role of the researcher as co-operative achievement. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in the conversations of a man with severe aphasia. In B. Fox, C. Ford, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56-80). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303-317.
Goodwin, M. H. (1995). Assembling a response: Setting and collaboratively constructed work talk. In P. T. Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 173-186). Washington DC: University Press of America.
Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work Setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 436-461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (1998). Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. In S. Hoyle & C. T. Adger (Eds.), Kids’ talk: Strategic language use in later childhood (pp. 23-46). New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. London: Routledge.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies and changing landscapes. Semiotica: Special issue: Mobile communication: Interaction in cars, edited by Penti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, and Maurice Nevile, 191(1/4), 257-286.
Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2012). Mobile communication: Interaction in cars, 191 (1/4)).
Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2013). Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage.
Hindmarsh, J., & Llewellyn, N. (2018). Video in sociomaterial investigations: A solution to the problem of relevance for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 412-437.
Hofstetter, E. (2021) Analyzing the researcher-participant in EMCA. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
McIlvenny, P., Broth, M. Haddington, P. (2014). Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction. Space and Culture, 17(2), 104-106.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.
Mondada, L. (2013). Coordinating mobile action in real time: The timely organization of directives in video games. In P. L. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Mobility and interaction (pp. 300-342). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mondada, L. (2017). Walking and talking together: Questions/answers and mobile participation in guided visits. Social Science Information, 56(2), 1-34.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
Pehkonen, S., Rauniomaa, M. and P. Siitonen. (2021) Participating researcher or researching participant? On possible positions of the researcher in the collection (and analysis) of mobile video data. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Sudnow, D. (2001). Ways of the hand: A rewritten account. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
