Balancing research goals and community expectations

The affordances of body cameras and participant observation in the study of wildlife conservation


  • Rosalie Edmonds University of California, Los Angeles



body cameras, researcher participation, ethnography, research ethics, wildlife conservation


This article explores the possibilities that arise from combining participant observation with body camera recording, through the analysis of the use of a GoPro to study communication at a Cameroonian wildlife sanctuary. The original goal of this research project was to use both video recording and participant observation as separate methodologies in order to understand how Cameroonian animal keepers and European volunteers at the Limbe Wildlife Centre worked across linguistic and ideological barriers to rehabilitate chimpanzees. However, increased participant observation became necessary due both to research participants’ expectations that the researcher contribute to daily work activities, as well as the logistical difficulties of recording highly-mobile work in a loud, wet, and potentially dangerous environment. To negotiate these expectations and constraints, the researcher wore a body camera while working alongside research participants, allowing her to capture a first-person perspective as she assisted animal keepers and volunteers in cleaning enclosures and caring for animals. Although the use of a body camera posed certain complications in terms of both audio quality and camera placement, participating while recording provided a unique window into participants’ daily work experiences, and helped the researcher build strong, mutually beneficial relationships at the field site. For these reasons, this article argues that body cameras create new possibilities for both capturing first-person perspectives in mobile settings, and for allowing researchers to more fully collaborate with their participants.


Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: MacMillan.

Bailey, B. (1997). Communication of Respect in Interethnic Service Encounters. Language in Society 26(3), 327-356.

Biloa, E. & Echu, G. (2008). Cameroon: Official Bilingualism in a Multilingual State. In Simpson, A. (Ed.), Language and National Identity in Africa (pp. 199-213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, B., McGregor, M., & Laurier, E. (2013). iPhone in vivo: Video Analysis of Mobile Device Use. CHI 2013, April 27-May 2, 2013. Paris, France. pp.1031-1040.

Brown, Katrina M., & Banks, Esther (2015). Close encounters: Using mobile video ethnography to understand human-animal relations. In. C. Bates (Ed.), Video methods: Social science research in motion (pp. 95−120). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.

Chen, R. (2021). The interplay of participant roles in collecting video data of non-speaking autistic individuals. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Edmonds, R. (2019). Language Ideologies, Conservation Ideologies: Communication and Collaboration at a Cameroonian Wildlife Sanctuary. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Edmonds, R. (2020). Multilingualism and the politics of participation at a Cameroonian wildlife sanctuary. Language and Communication 72, 1-12.

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., and Shaw, L.L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Second Edition. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2), 123-132.

Goico, S. (2021). The Participation Role of the Researcher as a Co-operative Achievement. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-522.

Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. London: Routledge.

Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and Understanding. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hofstetter, E. (2021). Analyzing the researcher-participant in EMCA. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Jacquemet, M. (2011). Crosstalk 2.0: Asylum and Communicative Breakdowns. Text & Talk 31(4), 475–497.

Keevallik, L. (2018). "Sequence Initiation or Self-Talk? Commenting on the Surroundings While Mucking out a Sheep Stable", Research on Language & Social Interaction 51(3), 313-328.

Lahlou, S., Le Bellu, S., & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2015). Subjective Evidence Based Ethnography: Method and Applications. Integr Psych Behav 49, 216-238.

Maclean, R. (2019). Cameroon Anglophone Separatist Leader Handed Life Sentence”. The Guardian.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mitsuhara, T. V. (2019). Moving Toward Utopia: Language, Empathy, and Chastity among Mobile Mothers and Children in Mayapur, West Bengal (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertation & Theses Global Database.

Mondada, L. (2012). The Conversation Analytic Approach to Data Collection. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. pp.32-56. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118325001.

Mondada, L. (2013). Interactional Space and the Study of Embodied Talk-Interaction.In Auer, P., Hilpert, M., Stukenbrock, A., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (Eds.) Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives. pp. 247–275. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Mondada, L. (2014). Bodies in action: Multimodal analysis of walking and talking. Language and Dialogue. 4(3), 357-403.

Mondémé, C. (2011) Animal as subject matter for social sciences: when linguistics addresses the issue of dog's "speakership". In Non-humans in Social Science: Animals, Spaces, Things, pp.87-104. Pavel Mervart,

Murphy, K. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 156, 113-145.

Nyamnjoh, F. (1999). Cameroon: A Country United by Ethnic Ambition and Difference. African Affairs. 98, 101–118.

Parreñas, R. S. (2018). Decolonizing Extinction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Pehkonen, S., Rauniomaa, M., and Siitonen, P. (2021). Participating researcher or researching participant? On possible positions of the researcher in the collection (and analysis) of mobile video data. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Pouchet, J. (2020). The Circulation, Durability, and Erasure of Brands in a Biodiversity Hotspot. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 30(1), Early view.

Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.




How to Cite

Edmonds, R. (2021). Balancing research goals and community expectations: The affordances of body cameras and participant observation in the study of wildlife conservation. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).