Analyzing the researcher-participant in EMCA


  • Emily Hofstetter Linköping University



researcher as participant, participant observation, unique adequacy, naturalistic data, video analysis


Conversation analysis strives to use naturalistic data in its research, but the definition of “natural” is often unclear (Speer, 2002) and can be at odds with both ethnomethodological understandings of data (Lynch, 2002) and practices of data collection (e.g., Stevanovic et al., 2017; Goodwin, 2018). In this paper, I reconsider the concept of naturalness with respect to a particular data collection practice: When the researcher themselves is a participant in the recorded data. I argue that analysis may be guided by how the researcher-participant is treated by others in the data, and that researchers may be considered as any other participant if treated as making activity-adequate (rather than research-adequate) contributions. Furthermore, researcher presence can demonstrate unique adequacy and provides opportunities to experiment with situated practices that otherwise are atypical or hard to access. This version of “natural” respecifies naturalness as a members’ concern in recorded interaction.


Ayaß, R. (2020). Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 0891241619897413.

Baranova, J. (2020). Reasons for every-day activities [Doctoral thesis, Radboud University].

Bennerstedt, U., Ivarsson, J., & Linderoth, J. (2012). How gamers manage aggression: Situating skills in collaborative computer games. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 43–61.

Broth, M., & Lundström, F. (2013). A walk on the pier: Establishing relevant places in mobile interaction. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 91–122). De Gruyter.

Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2019). Delaying moving away: Place, mobility, and the multimodal organization of activities. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 44–70.

Chen, R. (2021). The researcher’s participant roles in ethical data collection of autistic interaction. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Dutkiewicz, J. (2015). Pretzel Logic: An Embodied Ethnography of a Rock Climb. Space and Culture, 18(1), 25–38.

Edmonds, R. (2021). Balancing research goals and community expectations: The affordances of body cameras and participant observation in the study of wildlife conservation. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.

Garfinkel, H. (1986). Ethnomethodological studies of work. Routledge & K. Paul.

Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s Program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5.

Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of sociological analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Sage.

Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations With an Aphasic Man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 233–260.

Goodwin, C. (2004). A Competent Speaker Who Can’t Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170.

Goodwin, C. (2010). Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 373–394). John Benjamins.

Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23.

Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.

Hazel, S. (2016). The paradox from within: Research participants doing-being-observed. Qualitative Research, 16(4), 446–467.

Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2002). Analyzing interaction: Video, ethnography, and situated conduct. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Action (pp. 99–121). SAGE.

Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE.

Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.

Hofstetter, E. (2019, April 25). Shifting in and out of falls in rock climbing. COACT, Oulu, Finland.

Hofstetter, E. (2020a). Nonlexical “Moans”: Response Cries in Board Game Interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65.

Hofstetter, E. (2020b). Achieving Preallocation: Turn Transition Practices in Board Games. Discourse Processes, 0(0), 1–22.

Hofstetter, E., & Robles, J. (2019). Manipulation in Board Game Interactions: Being a Sporting Player. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 301–320.

Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: Optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(98), 76–89.

Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 181–190). Oxford University Press.

Livingston, E. (1986). The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. Routledge.

Lynch, M. (2000). Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26–54.

Lynch, M. (2002). From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: Comment on Speer. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 531–537.

Macbeth, D. (2012). Some Notes on the Play of Basketball in its Circumstantial Detail, and an Introduction to Their Occasion. Human Studies, 35(2), 193–208.

Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(4), 301–316.

Mondada, L. (2006). Video recordings as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 51–67). Oxford University Press.

Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 32–56). John Wiley & Sons.

Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62.

Pehkonen, S., Rauniomaa, M., and Siitonen, P. (2021). Participating researcher or researching participant? On possible positions of the researcher in the collection (and analysis) of mobile video data. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).

Pollner, M. (1991). Left of Ethnomethodology: The Rise and Decline of Radical Reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 370–380.

Pollner, M., & Emerson, R. M. (2007). Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 118–135). Sage.

Potter, J. (2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 539–542.

Reynolds, E. (2017). Description of membership and enacting membership: Seeing-a-lift, being a team. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 99–119.

Robillard, A. B. (1996). Anger In-the-Social-Order. Body & Society, 2(1), 17–30.

Robinson, J. D. (2016). Accountability in social interation. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in social interaction (pp. 1–46). Oxford University Press.

Robles, J. S. (2015). Extreme Case (Re)formulation as a Practice for Making Hearably Racist Talk Repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(4), 390–409.

Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A. (2009). Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 42(4), 377–394.

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114.

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 101–137). Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216.

Schegloff, E. A. (2006). On possibles. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 141–157.

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up Closings. Semiotica, 8(4).

Schindler, L. (2017). Teaching bodies: Visual and haptic communication in martial arts. In C. Meyer & U. v. Wedelstaedt (Eds.), Moving bodies in interaction – Interacting bodies in Motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports (pp. 245–265). John Benjamins.

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

Sormani, P. (2016). Practice-based video analysis: A position statement. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 7(14), 103–121.

Speer, S. A. (2002a). 'Natural’ and 'contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4(4), 511–525.

Speer, S. A. (2002b). Transcending the 'natural’/'contrived’ distinction: A rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 543–548.

Stevanovic, M., Himberg, T., Niinisalo, M., Kahri, M., Peräkylä, A., Sams, M., & Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality, Mutual Visibility, and Behavioral Matching: Body Sway and Pitch Register During Joint Decision Making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 33–53.

Sudnow, D. (1983). Pilgrim in the microworld. Warner Books.

Sudnow, D. (1993). Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. MIT Press.

ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. SAGE Publications, Ltd.

Tuncer, S. (2016). The Effects of Video Recording on Office Workers’ Conduct, and the Validity of Video Data for the Study of Naturally-Occurring Interactions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Article 3.

Umair, M., Mertens, J., Albert, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (forthcoming). GailBot: An automatic transcription system for Conversation Analysis. Dialogue & Discourse.




How to Cite

Hofstetter, E. (2021). Analyzing the researcher-participant in EMCA. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).