Researchers’ participation roles in video-based fieldwork
An introduction to a special issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i2.127184Abstract
NA
References
Behar, Ruth & Gordon, Deborah (Eds.) (1992). Women writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cekaite, Asta (2020). Ethnomethodological approaches. In P. Vannini (Ed.) The Routledge international handbook of ethnographic film and video (pp. 83–94). Oxon: Routledge.
Cekaite, Asta & Marjorie Harness Goodwin (2021/this issue). Researcher participation, ethics, and cameras in the field. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Chen, Rachel S.Y. (2021/this issue). The researcher’s participant roles in ethical data collection of Autistic interaction. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Clifford, James & Marcus, George E. (Eds.) (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Duranti, Alessandro (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edmonds, Rosalie (2021/this issue). Balancing research goals and community expectations: The affordances of body cameras and participant observation in the study of wildlife conservation. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Erickson, Frederick (2011). Uses of video in social research: a brief history. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 179–189.
Erickson, Frederick (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In Judith L. Green, Gregory Camilli, Patricia B. Elmore, Gregory Camilli, and Patricia B Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-192). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association
Erickson, Frederick (2021/this issue). Co-operative participation, social ecology, and ethics in video-based ethnography. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
García-Sánchez, Inmaculada M. (2014). Language and Muslim immigrant childhoods: The politics of belonging. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Garfinkel, Harold., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of sociological analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). Sage.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goico, Sara (2021/this issue). The participation role of the researcher as a co-operative achievement. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Goodwin, Charles (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Goodwin, Charles (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170.
Goodwin, Charles (2010). Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 373–394). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222-244). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Asta Cekaite (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. Oxford and New York: Routledge.
Hazel, Spencer (2016). The paradox from within: Research participants doing-being-observed. Qualitative Research, 16(4), 446–467.
Heath, Christian (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian, & Hindmarsh, Jon (2002). Analyzing interaction: Video, ethnography, and situated conduct. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 99–121). SAGE.
Heath, Christian, Hindmarsh, Jon, & Luff, Paul (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE.
Hofstetter, Emily (2021/this issue). Analyzing the researcher-participant in EMCA. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Katila, Julia & Raudaskoski, Sanna (2020). Interaction analysis as an embodied and interactive process: Multimodal, co-operative, and intercorporeal ways of seeing video data as complementary professional visions. Human Studies 43. 445–470.
Knoblauch, Hubert, Schnettler, Bernt. Raab Jürgen & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.) (2006). Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology. Frankfurt: P. Lang.
Labov, William (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William (1972b). The study of language in its social context. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 180–202). Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
Laurier, Eric & Philo, Chris (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 181–190). Frankfurt: P. Lang.
Mead, Margaret (1975). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In P. Hockings (Ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (pp. 3-10). The Hague: Mouton.
Mitsuhara, Teruko Vida & Hauck, Jan David (2020). Video ethnography: A guide. In S. Perrino & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Research methods in linguistic anthropology, London: Bloomsbury.
Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Video recordings as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 51–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32-56). London: John Wiley.
Ochs, Elinor, Anthony P. Graesch, Angela Mittmann, Thomas Bradbury, and Rena Repetti (2006). Video ethnography and ethnoarchaeological tracking. In Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes, Ellen Ernst Kossek, and Stephen Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches (pp. 387–409). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pehkonen, Samu, Mirka Rauniomaa, & Pauliina Siitonen (2021/this issue). Participating researcher or researching participant? On possible positions of the researcher in the collection (and analysis) of mobile video data. Social Interaction: Video Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(2).
Sacks, Harvey (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Edited by Gail Jefferson from various unpublished lectures).
Speer, Susan A. (2002). ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4(4), 511–525.
Speer, Susan A., & Ian Hutchby (2003). From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices, Sociology, 37(2): 315–37.
Streeck, Jürgen & Mehus, Siri (2004). ‘Microethnography: The Study of Practices’. In Kristine L. Fitch & Robert E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 816–871). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tuncer, Sylvaine (2016). The effects of video recording on office workers’ conduct, and the validity of video data for the study of naturally-occurring interactions. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Article 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
