From appearings to disengagements
Openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare encounters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.122711Keywords:
tele-homecare, openings, closings, video-mediated interaction, multimodal conversation analysisAbstract
In this article, we examine openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare for older adults in Finland, using multimodal conversation analysis. We demonstrate how participants organise these boundaries sequentially and multimodally, how visual appearing and disengaging are of key importance in these processes, and how openings and closings mirror each other in this institutional setting. In the openings, the participants orient to sequential structures that resemble those from mundane telephone conversations and Skype interactions: summons−answer, appearing−noticing, greeting−greeting and the “how are you” question−answer. The participants treat appearing as an accountable part of the opening, and delay advancing to the “how are you” question until a proper visual appearing is produced. Closings are managed through stepwise transition practices that result in a terminal exchange and both participants disengaging from the encounter: the clients, by walking away; the nurses, by closing down the connection. In addition to managing visuality, time-oriented talk is present in both openings and closings. A comparison of our results with findings from other technology-mediated encounters emphasises the importance of visuality in managing closings, and shows that tele-homecare is an interesting hybrid of institutionality and informality.
References
Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 41–58. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016
Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2019). Delaying moving away: Place, mobility, and the multimodal organization of activities. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.013
De Fornel, M. (1994). Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique [International framework of the videophone exchange]. Réseaux, 64, 107–132. doi:10.3406/reso.1994.2473
Duuly, M., & Tudini, V. (2016). ‘Now we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.008
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ekberg, S., & LeCouteur, A. (2014). Making arrangements in talk-in-interaction. Text & Talk, 34(4), 377–400.
Femø Nielsen, M. (2013). ‘Stepping stones’ in opening and closing department meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 50(1), 34–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612465182.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Harjunpää, K., Mondada, L., & Svinhufvud, K. (2018). The coordinated entry into service encounters in food shops: Managing interactional space, availability, and service during openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485231
Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Closing the conversation: Evidence from the academic advising session. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544803.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992a). Collaboration and control. Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 69–94.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992b). Media spaces and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 315–345.
Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: P. A.: John Benjamins.
Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2015). Working the overall structural organization of a call: How customers use third position as leverage for gaining service representatives’ assistance in dealing with service problems. Language & Communication, 43, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.05.001
Leydon, G. M., Ekberg, K., & Drew, P. (2013). ‘How can I help?’ Nurse call openings on a cancer helpline and implications for call progressivity. Patient Education and Counselling, 92, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.007.
Lindström, A., & Heinemann, T. (2009). Good enough: Low-grade assessments in caregiving situations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 309–328. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08351810903296465
Licoppe, C. (2017). Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’. The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings. Pragmatics, 27(3), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.3.03lic.
Licoppe, C., & Dumoulin, L. (2010). The ‘curious case’ of an unspoken opening speech act: A video-ethnography of the use of video communication in courtroom activities. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08351811003741319
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, (18)1, 51–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_3
Luff, P., Heath, C., Yamashita, N., Kuzuoka, H., & Jirotka, M. (2016). Embedded reference: Translocating gestures in video-mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088
Mlynár, J., González-Martínez, E., & Lalanne, D. (2018). Situated organization of video-mediated interaction: A review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies. Interacting with Computers, 30(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx019
Mondada, L. (2001). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Tutorial available online: https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016.
Olbertz-Siitonen, M. (2015). Transmission delay in technology-mediated interaction at work. PsychNology Journal, 13(2-3), 203–234.
Pappas, Y., & Seale, C. (2009). The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 68(7), 1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.011
Peräkylä, A. (2004). Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (pp. 283–304). London, U.K., Thousand Oaks, CA., & New Delhi, India: Sage Publications Ltd.
Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2016). Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736.
Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor−patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00438.x
Robinson, J. D. (2001). Closing medical encounters: Two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients’ unstated concerns. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00366-x
Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in physician‐patient encounters. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00782.x
Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (2001). Co-constructing non-mutual realities: Delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011243905593
Ruusuvuori, J (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00227-6
Satar, H.M. (2013). Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL, 28(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000286
Schegloff, E.A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
Schegloff, E.A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9(2),111–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley−Blackwell.
Stommel, W., van Goor, H., & Stommel, M. (2019). Other-attentiveness in video consultation openings: A conversation analysis of video-mediated versus face-to-face consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz015
Sävenstedt, S., Zingmark, K., Hydén, L., & Brulin, C. (2005). Establishing joint attention in remote talks with the elderly about health: A study of nurses’ conversation with elderly persons in teleconsultations. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19(4), 317–324.
Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 172–185.
Woods, C. J., Drew, P., & Leydon, G. M. (2015). Closing calls to a cancer helpline: Expressions of caller satisfaction. Patient Education and Counselling, 98, 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.015
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
