From appearings to disengagements: Openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare encounters

  • Sakari Ilomäki Tampere University
  • Johanna Ruusuvuori Tampere University
Keywords: tele-homecare, openings, closings, video-mediated interaction, multimodal conversation analysis


In this article, we examine openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare for older adults in Finland, using multimodal conversation analysis. We demonstrate how participants organise these boundaries sequentially and multimodally, how visual appearing and disengaging are of key importance in these processes, and how openings and closings mirror each other in this institutional setting. In the openings, the participants orient to sequential structures that resemble those from mundane telephone conversations and Skype interactions: summonsanswer, appearingnoticing, greetinggreeting and the “how are you” questionanswer. The participants treat appearing as an accountable part of the opening, and delay advancing to the “how are you” question until a proper visual appearing is produced. Closings are managed through stepwise transition practices that result in a terminal exchange and both participants disengaging from the encounter: the clients, by walking away; the nurses, by closing down the connection. In addition to managing visuality, time-oriented talk is present in both openings and closings. A comparison of our results with findings from other technology-mediated encounters emphasises the importance of visuality in managing closings, and shows that tele-homecare is an interesting hybrid of institutionality and informality.


Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309.

Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 41–58. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016

Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2019). Delaying moving away: Place, mobility, and the multimodal organization of activities. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 44–70.

De Fornel, M. (1994). Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique [International framework of the videophone exchange]. Réseaux, 64, 107–132. doi:10.3406/reso.1994.2473

Duuly, M., & Tudini, V. (2016). ‘Now we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 38–53.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ekberg, S., & LeCouteur, A. (2014). Making arrangements in talk-in-interaction. Text & Talk, 34(4), 377–400.

Femø Nielsen, M. (2013). ‘Stepping stones’ in opening and closing department meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 50(1), 34–67.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.

Harjunpää, K., Mondada, L., & Svinhufvud, K. (2018). The coordinated entry into service encounters in food shops: Managing interactional space, availability, and service during openings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 271–291.

Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Closing the conversation: Evidence from the academic advising session. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 93–116.

Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992a). Collaboration and control. Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 69–94.

Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992b). Media spaces and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 315–345.

Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19(2), 89–102.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: P. A.: John Benjamins.

Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2015). Working the overall structural organization of a call: How customers use third position as leverage for gaining service representatives’ assistance in dealing with service problems. Language & Communication, 43, 47–57.

Leydon, G. M., Ekberg, K., & Drew, P. (2013). ‘How can I help?’ Nurse call openings on a cancer helpline and implications for call progressivity. Patient Education and Counselling, 92, 23–30.

Lindström, A., & Heinemann, T. (2009). Good enough: Low-grade assessments in caregiving situations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 309–328. 10.1080/08351810903296465

Licoppe, C. (2017). Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’. The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings. Pragmatics, 27(3), 351–386.

Licoppe, C., & Dumoulin, L. (2010). The ‘curious case’ of an unspoken opening speech act: A video-ethnography of the use of video communication in courtroom activities. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(3), 211–231. 10.1080/08351811003741319

Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429.

Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, (18)1, 51–84.

Luff, P., Heath, C., Yamashita, N., Kuzuoka, H., & Jirotka, M. (2016). Embedded reference: Translocating gestures in video-mediated interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 342–361.

Mlynár, J., González-Martínez, E., & Lalanne, D. (2018). Situated organization of video-mediated interaction: A review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies. Interacting with Computers, 30(2), 73–84.

Mondada, L. (2001). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Tutorial available online:

Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.

Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62.

Olbertz-Siitonen, M. (2015). Transmission delay in technology-mediated interaction at work. PsychNology Journal, 13(2-3), 203–234.

Pappas, Y., & Seale, C. (2009). The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 68(7), 1229–1237.

Peräkylä, A. (2004). Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.) Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (pp. 283–304). London, U.K., Thousand Oaks, CA., & New Delhi, India: Sage Publications Ltd.

Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2016). Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736.

Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor−patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 97–123.

Robinson, J. D. (2001). Closing medical encounters: Two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients’ unstated concerns. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 639–656.

Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in physician‐patient encounters. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253–298.

Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (2001). Co-constructing non-mutual realities: Delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 113–138.

Ruusuvuori, J (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108.

Satar, H.M. (2013). Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL, 28(3), 305–325.

Schegloff, E.A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.

Schegloff, E.A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9(2),111–151.

Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.

Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley−Blackwell.

Stommel, W., van Goor, H., & Stommel, M. (2019). Other-attentiveness in video consultation openings: A conversation analysis of video-mediated versus face-to-face consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24, 275–292.

Sävenstedt, S., Zingmark, K., Hydén, L., & Brulin, C. (2005). Establishing joint attention in remote talks with the elderly about health: A study of nurses’ conversation with elderly persons in teleconsultations. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19(4), 317–324.

Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 172–185.

Woods, C. J., Drew, P., & Leydon, G. M. (2015). Closing calls to a cancer helpline: Expressions of caller satisfaction. Patient Education and Counselling, 98, 943–953.

Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

How to Cite
Ilomäki, S., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2020). From appearings to disengagements: Openings and closings in video-mediated tele-homecare encounters. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(3).