Self-Touch as Sociality
Keywords:interaction, touch, self-touch, sociality, intercorporeality
Self-touch is often understood as a form of interactional disengagement and withdrawal, of self-involvement, and co-participants are said to disattend ‘self-grooming’ actionsIn this paper, I present interactional sequences during which the parties touch themselves at the same time, or in succession. These data thus suggest that self-touch can also be an engagement display. Approaching self-touch from the ‘point of view’ of idle hands in need of something to do, and of interaction as in need of ongoing mutual coordination, I present cooperative self-touch as a display of the deeply social nature of the human body.
Bavelas, J.B. et al. (1986). “I Show How You Feel”: Motor Mimicry as a Communicative Act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 2, 322-329.
Deacon, T. Q. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
Foçillon, H. (1992 (1934)). The Life of Forms in Art. New York: Zone Books.
Freedman, N. (1977). Hand, word, and mind: On the structuralization of body movement and the capacity for verbal representation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative Structures and Psychic Structures. A Psychoanalytic Interpretation of Communication. New York: Plenum Press.
Freud, S. (1955). The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Basic Books.Godfrey-Smith, P. (2017). Other Minds. The Octopus and the Evolution of Intelligent Life. London: William Collins.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor Cognition. What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemmer, S. (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Kendon, A. (1973). The role of visible behaviour in the organization of face-to-face interaction. In M. v. Cranach & I. Vine (Eds.), Social Communication and Movement: Studies of Interaction and Expression in Man and Chimpanzee (pp. 29-74). New York: Academic Press.
Kendon, A. (1988). Goffman’s approach to face-to-face interaction. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Leader, D. (2016). Hands. What We Do with Them - and Why. London: Penguin.
Lerner, G.H, & Raymond, G. (2017), On the practical re-intentionalization of body behavior: Action pivots in the progressive realization of embodied conduct. In Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, G Raymond, G,H. Lerner, & J. Heritage, eds. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 299–313.
Lllinas, R. R. (2001). I of the Vortex. From Neurons to Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marzke, M., & Wullstein, K. (1996). Chimpanzee and human grips: A new classification with a focus on evolutionary morphology. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 117-139.
McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting Craft. The Practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Morris, D. (1977). Manwatching. A Field Guide to Human Behavior. New York: Harry N.Abrams.
Scheflen, A. (1972). Body Language and Social Order. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body Torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535-596.
Streeck, J. (1995). On projection. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction (pp. 87-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The Manu-facture of Meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Streeck, J. (2013a). Praxeology of gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Handbook Body Laguage Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. (Vol. 1, pp. 674-685). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69 - 90.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.