Multi-Sensory Perception during Palpation in Japanese Midwifery Practice

  • Aug Nishizaka
Keywords: Multi-sensory perception, Midwifery, Conversation analysis, Palpation, Local order to activity

Abstract

This paper demonstrates ways in which vision is integrated with other modalities of perception in a manner relevant to a temporally unfolding activity. It will do so by analyzing a single episode extracted from an abdominal palpation conducted on a pregnant woman by a midwife in Japan. The episode forms a “natural experiment” through which one can demonstrate that the integrated visual and tactile perception of an object is organized differently according to the status of the ongoing activity in which it is embedded. Data are in Japanese with English translations.

References

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.
Cekaite, A. (2015). Coordination of talk and touch in adults’ directives to children: Touch and social control. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 152–175.
Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42.
Cekaite, A. & Kvist, M. H. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109–127.
Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan.
Coulter, J. (1994). Is contextualisation necessarily interpretive? Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 689–698.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive construction of intimacy through touch. In Meyer, C., Streeck, J. & Jordan, S. J. (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care and mundane creativity. London: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Husserliana Band XVI (pp. 1-293). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294-33). New York, NY: Free Press.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and interactional resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction Competence (pp. 63-92). London and Washington: University Press of American.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: A teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35(1), 27–49.
Maynard, S. K. (1994). An introduction to Japanese grammar and communication strategies. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Donald A. Landes. New York: Routledge.
Mori, J. (2014). The re-examination of so-called ‘clefts’: A study of multiunit turns in Japanese talk-in-interaction. In K. Kabata & T. Ono (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to Japanese grammar: Towards the understanding of human language (pp. 193–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nishizaka, A. (2007). Hand touching hand: Referential practice at a Japanese midwife house. Human Studies, 30(3), 199–217.
Nishizaka, A. (2010). Self-initiated problem presentation in prenatal checkups: Its placement and construction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(3), 283–313.
Nishizaka, A. (2011). The embodied organization of a real-time fetus: The visible and the invisible in prenatal ultrasound examinations. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 309–336.
Nishizaka, A. (2016). Syntactical constructions and tactile orientations: Procedural utterances and procedures in massage therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 98, 18–35.
Nishizaka, A. (2017). The perceived body and embodied vision in interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(2), 110–128.
Nietzsche, F. (2006 [1887]). On the genealogy of morals. Translated by Carol Diethe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociological inquiry, 50(3‐4), 104-152.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyama, Y. (2001). Obstetrics (7th ed.). Kyoto: Kinpodo.
Terasaki, A. K. (2004.) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (172–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yamada, K. (2016). What is Wittgenstein’s view of knowledge?: An analysis of the context dependency of knowledge. Studies on Humanities and Social Sciences of Chiba University, 33, 19–26.
Published
2020-05-15
How to Cite
Nishizaka, A. (2020). Multi-Sensory Perception during Palpation in Japanese Midwifery Practice. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i1.120256