Human-to-human touch in institutional settings:
Introduction to the special issue
Aaltola, M. (2012). Understanding the politics of pandemic scares: An introduction to global politosomatics. London and New York: Routledge.
Burdelski, M. J. (2020). Embodiment, ritual, and ideology in a Japanese-as-a-heritage language preschool classroom. In M. J. Burdelski & K. M. Howard (eds.), Language socialization in classrooms: Culture, interaction, and language development (pp. 200-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canetti, E. (1978 ). Crowds and power. Translated by C. Stewart. New York: Continuum.
Cascio, C. J., Moore, D. & McGlone, F. (2019). Social touch and human development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 35, 5-11.
Cekaite, A. (2015.) The coordination of talk and touch in adults’ directives to children: Touch and social control. Research on language and social interaction, 48(2), 152–175.
Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult-child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42.
Cekaite, A. & Kvist Holm, M. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109–127.
Cekaite, A. & Mondada, L. (eds.) (2020). Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body. London and New York: Routledge.
Depperman, A. (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 1-7.
Finnegan, R. (2002). Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection. London: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1971). The territories of self. In E. Goffman Relations in public: Microstudies of the Public Order (pp. 28-61). New York: Harper & Row, Publishers,
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522.
Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Haptic sociality. The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (eds.) Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction (pp. 73–102.). New York: Oxford University Press,
Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. New York: Routledge.
Greco, L., Galatolo, R., Horlacher, A. S., Piccoli, V., Ticca, A. C. & Ursi, B. (2019). Some theoretical and methodological challenges of transcribing touch in talk-in-interaction. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 2(1).
Heinonen, P., Karvonen, U. & Tainio, L. (2020). Hand-on-shoulder touch as a resource for constructing a pedagogically relevant participation framework. Linguistics and Education 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100795
Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 103-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hertenstein, M. J. & Weiss, S. J. (2011). The handbook of touch: Neuroscience, behavioral, and health perspectives. New York: Springer.
Kääntä, L. & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2013). Manual guiding in peer-group interaction: A resource for organizing a practical classroom task. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 322–343.
Keevallik, L. & Ekström, A. (2019). How to take the floor as a couple: Turn-taking in Lindy Hop jam circles. Visual Anthropology, 32(5), 423-444.
Lefebre, A. (2020). To touch and to be touched: The coordination of touching-whole-body-movements in Aikido practice. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (eds.), Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body (pp. 150-170). London and New York: Routledge.
Marx, V., & Nagy, E. (2017). Fetal behavioral responses to the touch of the mother’s abdomen: A frame-by-frame analysis. Infant Behavior and Development, 47, 83-91.
Mauss, M. (1979 ). Body techniques. In M. Mauss Sociology and psychology: Essays (pp. 97-123). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merlino, S. (2020). Professional touch in speech and language therapy for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (eds.), Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body (pp. 197-223). London and New York: Routledge.
Meyer, C., Streeck, J. & Jordan, J. S. (eds.) (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press
Meyer, C. & v. Wedelstaedt, U. (eds.) (2017). Moving bodies in interaction—Interacting bodies in motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336-366.
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51, 85-106.
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47-62.
Montagu, A. (1986). Touching: The human significance of the skin. New York: Perennial Library.
Nilsson, E., Ekström, A., & Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Speaking for and about a spouse with dementia: A matter of inclusion or exclusion? Discourse Studies, 20(6), 770-791.
Nishizaka, A. (2007). Hand touching hand: Referential practice at a Japanese midwife house. Human Studies, 30(3), 199-217.
Nishizaka, A. (2011). Touch without vision: Referential practice in a non-technological environment. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 504-520.
Nishizaka, A. (2016). Syntactical constructions and tactile orientations: Procedural utterances and procedures in massage therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 98, 18-35.
Paterson, M. (2007). The senses of touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Oxford: Berg.
Streeck, J. Goodwin, C. & LeBaron, C. (eds.) (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.