Assembling nature as an art object: A single video case analysis of two landscape artists navigating social context

  • Maximilon Baddeley Victoria University of Wellington
Keywords: ethnomethodology, the new sociology of art, gestalt contextures

Abstract

Using video data obtained from a one-day field ethnography, I utilised the ethnomethodological respecification of ‘gestalt-contextures’ to describe in fine detail how two artists and a social researcher haphazardly organised themselves to navigate river terrain. The art object took on many meanings within the ongoing context of the group’s verbal and non-verbal, vernacular, and expert ability to observe the subject matter. Whilst organising join-attention to an array of natural objects, the participants defined pathway limitations, and rerouted, reviewed and positioned their bodies amongst the landscape. These socially acknowledged features typically remain unexposed when art sociologists discuss ‘artwork’. Due to the value of understanding the production of artistic objects in, and as a variety of socially maintained endogenous orders, the reportage of ‘gestalt assembly’ may furnish ‘the new sociology of art’ with materials for pursuing an alternative style of social research: the investigation of ordinary social context as member’s ongoing enacted achievement.

References

Acord, S.K. and DeNora, T. (2008) ‘Culture and the Arts: From Art Worlds to Art in Action’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 19(6), 223–37.

Alexander, J. (2004) Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.

Bar-Hillel, Y. (1954). Indexical Expressions. Mind, 63, 359-379.

Baxandall, M. (1972) Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Becker, H., Faulkner, R., Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (eds) (2006) Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, Writing, and Other Improvisations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

De La Fuente, E. (2007) ‘The New Sociology of Art: Putting Art Back into Social Science Approaches to the Arts’, Cultural Sociology, 1(3), 409–25.

De La Fuente, E. (2010) ‘The Artwork Made Me Do It: Introduction to the New Sociology of Art’, Thesis Eleven, 103(1), 3–9.

De La Fuente, E. (2019). After the cultural turn: For a textural sociology. The Sociological Review, 1-16

DeNora, T (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

DeNora, T. (2014). Making Sense of Reality: culture and perception in everyday life. Sage, London

De Stefani, E. (2014). Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store. How practices of categorisation matter. In. Nevile, E., Haddington, P., & Heinemann, T. (2014) (Eds.). Interactive with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. London: John Benjamin’s Company

Dominguez Rubio, F. and Silva, E. (2013). Materials in the Field: Object-trajectories and Object-positions in the Field of Contemporary Art. Cultural Sociology, 7(2), 161-178.

Fele, P. (2008). The phenomenal field: ethnomethodological perspectives on collective phenomena. Human Studies, 31, 299-322.

Fox, N. (2015). Creativity, anti-humanism and the ‘new sociology of art’. Journal of Sociology, 51(3), 522 – 536

Garfinkel, H. Lynch, M & Livingston, E. (1981). The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131-158

Garfinkel, H. (2007) Four Relations between Literatures of the Social Scientific Movement and their Specific Ethnomethodological Alternates. In, Orders of Ordinary Action. Aldershot: Ashgate

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's Program. Rowman & Littlefield, London

Garfinkel, H., and Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In: JC McKinney, and EA Tiryakian (Eds.) Theoretical Sociology. (pp. 160–193). Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, L. (1992). “Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis”, in: Text in context: studies in ethnomethodology (Graham Watson, Robert M. Seiler, eds. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 175-206.

Gerber, A. and Klett, J. (2014). The Meaning of Indeterminacy: Noise Music as Performance. Cultural Sociology, 8(3), 275-290

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96,(3), 606-633

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.

Green, G. (1996). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The Field of Consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Hanks, W. (2009). Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 10-24

Heath, C. and Vom Lehn, D. (2004) ‘Configuring Reception: (Dis)-Regarding the “Spectator” in Museums and Galleries’, Theory, Culture and Society, 21(6), 43–65

Hester, S. Francis, (2007). Orders of Ordinary Action. Aldershot Ashgate.

Hennion, A. (2019). Objects, Belief, and the Sociologist: The Sociology of Art as a Work-To-Be-Done. in A. Smuditis (ed.), Roads to Music Sociology, Musik und Gesellschaft, Springer

Hennion, A. and Grenier, L. (1999). Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time. In Sociology: Advances and Challenges in the 1990s. SAGE Publications.

Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855-1878

Kelly, R. (2019). “It’s over There. Sit Down.” Indexicality, The Mundane, The ordinary and The Everyday, and Much, Much More. Human Studies. Online: 11 June 2019

Kreplak, Y. (2018). Artworks in and as practices. The relevance of particulars. In: Practicing Art/Science: Experiments in an Emerging Field, edited by Philippe Sormani, et al., Routledge

Laurier, E. (2004). Noticing. In R. Leen. Castree and R. Kitchin. The SAGE handbook of human geography (vol.2, pp. 250-272). London: SAGE publications

Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lynch, M (2015). Garfinkel’s Studies of Work. Douglas Maynard and John Heritage (eds.), Harold Garfinkel: Praxis, Social Order, and the Ethnomethodology Movement, submitted to Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

Lynch, M. (2011). The origins of ethnomethodology. Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology: A Volume in the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Series. New York: Elsevier Science & Technology

Liberman, K. (2013). Semantic Drift in Conversations. Human Studies, 35(2), 263-277

Livingston, E. (2016). Ethnographies of Reason. Aldershot: Ashgate

Maynard, D. and Clayman, S. (1991). The Diversity of Ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385-420.

Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to Learn: The Embodied Structure of the Environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119-154

Schegloff, M. (1972). ‘Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place’, in Studies in Social Interaction (David Sudnow, ed.), pp. 75-119

Sudnow, D. (1978). Ways of the Hand. Cambridge: Polity Press

Tanner, J. (2010). Michael Baxandall and the Sociological Interpretation of Art. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 231-256

Turner, R. (1970). ‘Words, utterances and activities’, in Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. (Jack Douglas, ed.) London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Watson, R. (2008). Comparative Sociology, Laic and Analytic: Some Critical Remarks on Comparison in Conversation Analysis. Cahiers de praxematique, 50, 203-244

Watson, R. (2016). Harold Garfinkel and pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics. Vol. 20. John Benjamins Publishing Company

Watson, R. (2017). De-Reifying Categories. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage

Zembyalas, T. (2014). Artistic Practices. Routledge. New York

Zolberg, V. (2015). A Cultural sociology of the arts. Current Sociology, 63(3), 1-43

Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2020-06-05
How to Cite
Baddeley, M. (2020). Assembling nature as an art object: A single video case analysis of two landscape artists navigating social context. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i2.115673
Section
Artikler