To Live the Piety of Reason: Spinoza’s “Authentic” Choice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/rc.135711Nøgleord:
Spinoza, Excommunication, Cherem, AuthenticityResumé
ABSTRACT: Whether rabbinic authorities should remove the excommunication (cherem) of philosopher Benedict de Spinoza has been a matter of debate in recent years. Spinoza’s philosophical thought, however, demonstrates that this debate would not matter to him. His pantheism, developed in the Theological-Philosophical Treatise and the Ethics, will ever be a radical contestation of monotheism. Juxtaposing his philosophical views to the fictional narrative that existential psychologist Irvin D. Yalom offers, in his novel The Spinoza Problem, provides plausible psychological insight into Spinoza’s post-cherem identity in pursuit of authentic selfhood (‘authentic’ in Heidegger’s sense of ‘authenticity,’ Eigentlichkeit). Thereby, we can appreciate the enduring import of Spinoza’s radical enlightenment, the authentic choice of the identity he adopted, and his indefatigable commitment to the piety of reason, i.e., intellectual love of God (amor Dei intellectus).
Referencer
Alexis-Baker, Andy. 2012. “Spinoza’s Political Theology: Theocracy, Democracy and Monism,” Journal of Church and State, Vol. 54, No. 3, 426-444.
Altmann, Alexander. 1972. “Eternality of Punishment: A Theological Controversy Within the Amsterdam Rabbinate in the Thirties of the Seventeenth Century,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 40, 1-88.
Berman Joshua. 2019. “Orthodox Rabbinic Exception to the Thirteen Principles of Faith: The Dynamics of Boundary Permeability,” Modern Judaism, Vol. 39, No. 2, 161-183, https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjz007, accessed 02 November 2020).
Cardozo, Rabbi Nathan Lopes. 2015. “It is time to lift the ban,” Jerusalem Post, 31 December, https://www.jpost.com/magazine/it-is-time-to-lift-the-ban-438928, accessed 18 October 2020.
Garber, Daniel. 2008. “Chapter 9: Should Spinoza have published his philosophy?” in C. Heunemann, ed. Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 166-187.
Goldfarb, Michael. 2016. “Spinoza: The man who dared to be individual,” The Jewish Chronicle, 26 May, https://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/features/spinoza-the-man-who-dared-to-be-individual-1.57765, accessed 27 October 2020.
Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time, trans. J. Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1985. Schelling’s Treatise: On the Essence of Human Freedom, trans. J. Stambaugh. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
“Issues in Jewish Ethics: The Mussar Movement,” Jewish Virtual Library, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-mussar-movement, accessed 18 October 2020.
James, Susan. 2020. “Responding Emotionally to Fiction: A Spinozist Approach,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 85: Passions and Emotions, https://doi.org/10.1017/S13584246118000759, accessed 16 August 2021.
Jewish Virtual Library, “Articles of Faith,” https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/articles-of-faith-2, accessed 01 November 2020.
Kaufmann Kohler. “Ban” (cherem), Jewish Encyclopedia (http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/2433-ban), accessed 22 October 2020.
Koros, Sarah. 2017. “Maimonides’ Influence on Modern Judaic Thought and Practice,” Forbes & Fifth, Vol. 10, https://www.forbes5.pitt.edu/article/maimonides-influence-modern-judaic-thought-and-practice, accessed 01 November 2020.
Lysemose, Kasper. “The Force of Existence: Looking for Spinoza in Heidegger,” Sophia, 59:129-172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-019-0712-y, accessed 16 August 2021.
Mansbach, Abraham. 1991. “Heidegger on the Self, Authenticity and Inauthenticity,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 40, 65-91.
Nadler, Steven. 2015. “In or Out: The Spinoza Case,” Tablet, 08 December, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/in-or-out-the-spinoza-case, accessed 18 October 2020.
Nadler, Steven. 2014. “Judging Spinoza,” The New York Times, 25 May, https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/judging-spinoza/, accessed 18 November 2020.
Nadler, Steven. 2001a. Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nadler, Steven. 2001b. “The Excommunication of Spinoza: Trouble and Toleration in ‘Dutch Jerusalem’,” Shofar, Vol. 19, No. 4, 40-52.
Nadler, Steven. 1999. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2003. “Originary Ethics.” In S. Sparks, ed. A Finite Thinking. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Norris, Christopher. 2011. “Spinoza and the Conflict of Interpretations,” in Dimitris Vardoulakis, ed. Spinoza Now. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. 3-37.
Novak, David. “Response to William Goetschel: Spinoza’s Excommunication,” https://uwaterloo.ca/grebel/sites/ca.grebel/files/uploads/files/CGR-25-3-F2007-4.pdf, accessed 22 October 2020.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1998. “Exactly and Responsibly: A Defense of Ethical Criticism,” Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 22, No. 2, 343-365.
Pollock, Frederick. 2005. Spinoza: His Life and Philosophy. London: Elibron Classics, 2005.
Posner, Richard A. 1997. “Against Ethical Criticism,” Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1-27.
Posner, Richard A. 1998. “Against Ethical Criticism: Part Two,” Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1998, 394-412.
Preus, J. Samuel. 2001. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rocker, Simon. 2014. “Why Baruch Spinoza is still excommunicated,” The Jewish Chronicle, 28 August, https://www.thejc.com/judaism/features/why-baruch-spinoza-is-still-excommunicated-1.56419, accessed 22 October 2020.
Rubin, Jon. 2020. “‘Something of it Remains’: Thought, Individuation and the Eternity of the Mind,” Parrhesia, 32, 3-23.
Saperstein, Marc. 2009. “Spinoza’s Rabbi: Saul Levi Morteira’s Sermons to a Congregation of Amsterdam ‘New Jews’,” Levisson Instituut, 27 August, https://www.levisson.nl/lezingen/2009-saperstein-schleifer-wolde-baasten/attachment/saperstein_lezing_27_aug_09/, accessed 18 November 2020.
Saperstein, Marc. “Christianity, Christians and ‘New Christians’ in the Sermons of Saul Levi Morteira,” Hebrew Union College Annual, 1999-2000, Vol. 70/71, Hebrew Union College Press, 329-384.
Shapiro, Marc B. 2004. The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles Reappraised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, Marc B. 1993. “Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles: The Last Word in Jewish Theology?” The Torah U-Madda Journal, Vol. 4, 187-242.
Schechter, Solomon and Greenstone, Julius H. “Excommunication,” Jewish Encyclopedia (http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5933-excommunication, accessed 22 October 2020.
Shenker, Israel. 1978. “To the Editor: Spinoza,” Commentary, March, https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/reader-letters/spinoza-2/, accessed 22 October 2020.
Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2000. “Ist das Christentum notwendig intolerant?” in Rainer Forst, ed., Toleranz: Philosophische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Praxis einer umstrittene Tugend. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 177-213.
Spinoza: The Complete Works of Spinoza. 2002. trans. Samuel Shirley, ed. Michael L. Morgan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Steinberg, Justin. “Spinoza and the Problem of Freedom,” Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen, https://www.iwm.at/publications/5-junior-visiting-fellows-conferences/vol-xviii/justin-steinberg/, accessed 21 October 2020.
Tolan, John. 2016. “Blasphemy and Protection of the Faith: Legal Perspectives from the Middle Ages,” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, Vol. 27, https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2015.1087671, accessed 18 October 2020.
Tov, Emanuel. 2011. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, 3rd Ed. Minneapolis MN: Fortress Press.
Vardoulakis, Dimitris. 2020. “Freedom as Overcoming the Fear of Death: Epicureanism in the Subtitle of Spinoza’s Theological Political Treatise,” Parrhesia, 32, 33-60.
Yalom, Irvin D. 2012. The Spinoza Problem: A Novel. New York: Basic Books, 2012.
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 1978. “Yirmiyahu Yovel writes,” Commentary, March, https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/reader-letters/spinoza-2/, accessed 22 October 2020.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 Norman K. Swazo
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ingen bearbejdelser (by-nd).
Beskriv vilkårene her! Denne tekst dukker op under distribuering og licens
