Descartes’ Atomism of Thought: A Solution to the Puzzle about True and Immutable Natures

  • Steven Burgess Benedictine University

Abstract

Central to Descartes’ philosophy is a view about immutable essences and eternal truths. After mentioning a Platonist account of recollection in Meditation V, Descartes declares that the ideas we have of mathematical notions “are not my invention but have their own true and immutable natures” (AT VII, 64/CSM II, 44).Descartes claims that other important philosophical notions, such as God, mind, body, and human free will (AT VII, 68; AT VIII-2, 348; AT III, 383; AT VII, 433, respectively), also have immutable natures or essences. Although Descartes says a good many things about this view, nowhere does he offer definitive doctrine on the matter, and in fact frequently confuses his reader with apparently inconsistent pronouncements about immutable natures and eternal truths. In this essay, I focus on the immutable natures and propose a solution to two of the main problems associated with Descartes’ position, the metaphysical status of immutable natures and the purported indivisibility of their existence as ideas in the mind

 

References

Abbruzzese, John. 2007. “A Reply to Cunning on the Nature of True and Immutable Natures”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15, 155-167.

Ariew, Roger. 2011. Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden: Brill.

Ariew, Roger. 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ayers, Michael. 1998. “Ideas and Objective Being”. In Garber, Dan and Michael Ayers (eds.). The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chappell, Vere. 1986. “The Theory of Ideas.” In Amelie O. Rorty (ed.). Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

---. 1997. “Descartes’ Ontology”. Topoi 16, 111-127.

Cunning, David. 2003. “True and Immutable Natures and Epistemic Progress in Descartes’ Meditations”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11, 235-248.

---. 2008. “Fifth Meditation TINs Revisited: A Reply to Criticisms of the Epistemic Interpretation”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16, 215-227.

Curley, Edwin. M. 1978. Descartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Della Rocca, Michael. 2005. “Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology without God”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70, 1-33.

De Rosa, Raffaella. 2011. “Rethinking the Ontology of Cartesian Essences”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, 605-622.

Descartes, René. 1974-1989. Oeuvres de Descartes, 11 vols. Edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin.

---. 1984-1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. 1 and 2. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doney, Willis. 2005. “True and Immutable Natures”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13, 131-137.

Edelberg, Walter. 1990. “The Fifth Meditation”. The Philosophical Review 99, 493-533.

Eustachius a Sancto Paulo. 1609. Summa philosophiae quadripartite. Paris: Carolus Chastellain.

Funkenstein, Amos. 1975. “Descartes, Eternal Truths, and the Divine Omnipotence”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 6, 185-199.

Hattab, Helen. 2016. “Descartes on the Eternal Truths and Essences of Mathematics: An Alternative Reading”. Vivarium 54, 204-249.

Kenny, Anthony. 1970. “The Cartesian Circle and the Eternal Truths”. Journal of Philosophy 67, 685-700.

McRae, Robert. 1991. “Cartesian Matter and the Concept of a World”. In Georges Moyal (ed.). René Descartes: Critical Assessments, 4 vols. New York: Routledge.

Nadler, Steven. 2006. “The Doctrine of Ideas”. In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.). The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

Nolan, Lawrence. 1997. “The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78, 169-194.

Rozemond, Marleen. 2008. “Descartes’ Ontology of the Eternal Truths”. In Paul Hoffman and Gideon Yaffe. Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

Schmaltz, Tad. 1991. “Platonism and Descartes’ View of Immutable Essences”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 73, 129-170.

---. 2014. “The Fifth Meditation: Descartes’ Doctrine of True and Immutable Natures”. In David Cunning (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suarez, Francisco. 1877. Disputationes metaphysicae. In Vol. 26, Opera Omnia. Paris: Vivès.

Wells, Norman. 1982. “Descartes’ Uncreated Truths”. The New Scholasticism 56, 185-199.

---. 1984. “Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suarez”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22, 25-50.

---. 1993. “Descartes’ Idea and Its Sources”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67, 513-535.

Wilson, Margaret. 1978. Descartes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Published
2018-06-07
How to Cite
Burgess, S. (2018). Descartes’ Atomism of Thought: A Solution to the Puzzle about True and Immutable Natures. Res Cogitans, 13(2). Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/res_cogitans/article/view/106149