Accounting prototypes supporting product development: integrating different actors’ viewpoints

Forfattere

  • Asta Rantamaa Cost Management Center Tampere University of Technology PO Box 541 FI-33101 Tampere
  • Teemu Laine Cost Management Center Tampere University of Technology PO Box 541 FI-33101 Tampere
  • Tuomas Korhonen Cost Management Center Tampere University of Technology PO Box 541 FI-33101 Tampere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/propracon.v4i1.20930

Nøgleord:

Product development, accounting prototypes, knowledge integration, pragmatic constructivism

Resumé

This article introduces accounting prototypes in supporting managers in product development (PD), and inquires how accounting prototypes can support managers in PD activities. Accounting prototypes are jointly and iteratively created, preliminary tools, e.g., spreadsheets or information systems under development. Besides serving as control mechanisms, accounting prototypes also provide support for managers by integrating knowledge relevant to PD managers taking part in projects from different actors’ viewpoints. However, previous literature offers insufficient understanding of how accounting prototypes could help PD managers. The paper is based on an interventionist case study of a machinery manufacturer’s PD management. The focus of the case study was on the design and early use of accounting prototypes that would, right after PD execution, support production ramp-up, which was previously not much supported by accounting information. The paper contributes to the literature by showing an empirical example of supporting PD with accounting prototypes, and unveils the mechanisms through which the viewpoints of different business functions may be iteratively integrated in a calculation, thus enabling a more comprehensive view on the business impacts of a PD project. However, it was found out that the process of establishing and enhancing knowledge integration in the PD context is a longitudinal and challenging task also with the help of accounting prototypes.

Referencer

Ahrens, T., Chapman, C. 2007. Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1/2), 1–27.

Avery, H. G. 1952. Accounting as a Language. The Accounting Review, 28(1), 83-87.

Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization science, 14(3), 312-330.

Briers, M., Chua, W. F. 2001. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 237-269.

Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of the knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization science, 13(4), 442-455.

Cinquini, L., Mitchell, F., Nørreklit, H., & Tenucci, A. 2013. Methodologies for managing performance measurement. In F. Mitchell, H. Nørreklit & M. Jakobsen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to cost management (pp. 360-380) Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, New York.

Clark, K. B., Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, Organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, Harvard business school press.

D’Adderio, L. 2001. Crafting the virtual prototype: how firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organizational boundaries. Research Policy, 30, 1409-1424.

Davila, T., Wouters, M., 2007. Management accounting in the manufacturing sector: managing costs at the design and production stages, in: Chapman, C.S., Hopwood A.G., Shields, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2, 831–858.

Ditillo, A. 2012. Designing management control systems to foster knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: a network-based approach. European accounting review, 21(3), 425-450.

Earl, M. J. 1978. Prototype systems for accounting, information and control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(2), 161-170.

Earl, M. J. 1982. Prototype systems for accounting, information and control. Data base, 23(2-3), 39-46.

Goffin, K., Koners, U., Baxter, D., van der Hoven, C. 2010. Managing lessons learned and tacit knowledge in new product development. Industrial research institute, 10, 39-51.

Hall, M. 2010. Accounting information and managerial work. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 301–315.

Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative science quarterly, 44, 82-111.

Jönsson, S., Lukka, K. 2007. There and back again: Doing interventionist research in management accounting, in: Chapman, C.S., Hopwood A.G., Shields, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1, 373-392.

Jørgensen, B., Messner, M. 2010. Accounting and strategizing: A case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 184–204.

Korhonen, T. 2014. Performance Measurement Dynamism in Product Development. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, 161p.

Kraaijenbrink, J. 2012. Integrating knowledge and knowledge processes: a critical incident study of product development projects. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 1082-1096.

Nixon, B. 1998. Research and development performance measurement: a case study. Management Accounting Research, 9, 329-355.

Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., Mitchell, F. 2010. Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 733-758.

Suomala, P., Lyly-Yrjänäinen, J. 2011. Management Accounting Research in Practice: Lessons Learned from an Interventionist Approach. Routledge, New York.

Suomala, P., Lyly-Yrjänäinen, J., Lukka, K. 2014. Battlefield around interventions: A reflective analysis of conducting interventionist research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 25.

Van de Ven, A., Johnson, P. E. 2006. Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.

Wouters, M., Verdaasdonk, P. 2002. Supporting management decisions with ex ante accounting information, European Management Journal, 20(1), 82-94.

Wouters, M., Roijmans, D. 2011. Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708–736.

Downloads

Publiceret

2015-05-29

Citation/Eksport

Rantamaa, A., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2015). Accounting prototypes supporting product development: integrating different actors’ viewpoints. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 4(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.7146/propracon.v4i1.20930

Nummer

Årg. 4 Nr. 1 (2014)

Sektion

Essays

Licens

Previous and future use of the work

ProPraCon assumes the non-exclusive rights to publish and store the work of its authors, once they have consented to a publication. Since the rights to publish are non-exclusive, authors are free to re-use their work, e.g., to publish it in other media (as ProPraCon aims at publishing proceedings). Hence, it is explicitly allowed that works submitted to ProPraCon may be published in a somehow similar form in other media. Yet, submitting authors warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty.

Permissions

By submitting work to ProPraCon, the authors declare that they have permission to use any content that has not been created by them. Specifically, when using tables, figures or excerpts of more than 400 words, it is expected that the authors…

  1. …obtain written permission of copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material, in their work.  This includes any minor adaptations.
  2. …acknowledge the original source in captions and in the reference list.