Writing in Privacy to Mass Publics

The Pamphleteer as an Activist Writer

Authors

  • David Bebnowski LMU Munich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/psj.vi.129999

Keywords:

Martin Luther, Émile Zola, Mesut Özil, Pamphlets, Pamphleteering, Pamphleteers, Publics, Publicity, Privacy

Abstract

The relationship between authors and their readers can be understood in terms of a dialectic between privacy and publicity, in that written media are consumed privately but at the same time constitute the foundation of publics. In this relationship, the literary format of the pamphlet, understood as a short form that expresses protest, is unique in that its function and content in voicing protest remain remarkably stable over time. Due to this stability in content, the format is able to change and be present in different media landscapes. Because of these traits, the pamphlets and pamphleteers referenced in this essay will be used as probes to fathom the historical dialectic between publicity and privacy. By drawing on pamphlets written by reformer Martin Luther at the onset of print publics, literary figure Émile Zola in developed mass publics governed by newspapers as leading media, and German footballer Mesut Özil as a public figure in digital publics, this paper intends to illustrate the relationship between pamphleteers and publics across time both historically and theoretically. This will demonstrate how pamphlets can be perceived as a becoming public of the private intentions of its pamphleteers in a very direct way. At the same time, they help us to understand who turns to pamphleteering and under which circumstances. Conversely, an analysis of pamphlets and their respective pamphleteers shows their historical boundedness as historic figures and is thus indicative of changing publics. Furthermore, studying pamphlets and pamphleteering invites us to conduct further research into the formation of public opinion and the nature of the democratic demos as an entity that shows deep fractures over time.

References

Bibliography

Pamphlets

Özil, Mesut (@MesutOzil1088). “I/III” July 22, 2018, 12.52 pm, https://twitter.com/MesutOzil1088/status/1020984884431638528.

- “II/III” July 22, 2018, 3.03 pm, https://twitter.com/MesutOzil1088/status/1021017944745226242.

- “III/III”, July 22, 2018, 8.04 pm, https://twitter.com/MesutOzil1088/status/1021093637411700741/.

Luther, Martin. Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences, October 31, 1517, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Works_of_Martin_Luther,_with_introductions_and_notes,_Volume_1/Disputation_on_Indulgences#Ninety-five_Theses.

Zola, Émile. I accuse… Open Letter to the President of the French Republic [January 13, 1898], accessed December 14.2021, https://jean-max-guieu.facultysite.georgetown.edu/other-interests/english-translation-of-emile-zolas-jaccuse.

Other References

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London/New York: Verso 2006 [1983].

Angenot, Marc: “La parole pamphlétaire.” Étude littéraires 11, no. 2 (1978): 255-264.

Anonymized, 2022.

Anon. “Chronologie der Özil-Erdogan-Affäre,” Spiegel-Online, July 23, 2018. https://www.spiegel.de/sport/fussball/mesut-oezil-vom-foto-mit-recep-tayyip-erdogan-zum-ruecktritt-die-chronologie-a-1219642.html.

Barthes, Roland: “The Death of the Author” [1968]. In The Rustle of Language, edited by ibid., 49-56. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1986.

Beci, Veronika. Émile Zola. Düsseldorf/Zuerich: Artemis & Winkler, 2002.

Benjamin, Walter. “The Author as Producer” [1934]. In Understanding Brecht, edited by ibid., 85-103. London/New York: Verso, 1998.

Ciesinger, Ruth: “Ohne Umwege zu 71 Millionen sprechen”, Tagesspiegel, July 23, 2018. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/sport/mesut-oezil-und-social-media-ohne-umwege-zu-71-millionen-sprechen/22833022.html.

Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists. Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850-1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Darnton, Robert. “Anekdotomanie Blogging, heute und vor zweihundertfünfzig Jahren.” Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 8, no. 3 (2014): 57-78.

- “Paris: The Early Internet,” New York Review of Books, June 29, 2000, accessed December 14, 2021, https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2000/06/29/paris-the-early-internet/?lp_txn_id=1037986.

- The Literary Underground of the Old Regime. Cambridge MA/London: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Foresta, Patrizio. “Der Thesenanschlag. Geschichte eines Mythos”. In Martin Luther. Ein Christ zwischen Reformen und Moderne (1517-2017), edited by Alberto Melloni, 189-208. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2017.

Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” [1969]. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard, 113-138. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977.

Gross, Raphael; Lyon, Melanie; Welzer, Harald (ed.). Von Luther zu Twitter. Medien und Politische Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt a.M.: 2020, S. Fischer.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1989 [1962].

Hanna, Julian. The Manifesto Handbook. 95 Theses on an Incendiary Form. Winchester: Zero Books, 2020.

Hegel, G.W.F. “Aphorisms from the Wastebook”, The Independent Journal of Philosophy III (1979): 1-6.

Hübinger, Gangolf. Gelehrte, Politik und Öffentlichkeit. Eine Intellektuellengeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht, 2000.

Karant-Nunn, Susan C. The Personal Luther. Essays on the Reformer from a Cultural Historical Perspective. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2017.

Orwell, George. British Pamphleteers, vol. 1. London: Wingate, 1948.

Pettegree, Andrew. “Martin Luther, Buchdruck, Reformation.” In Von Luther zu Twitter, edited by Raphael Gross et. al.: 61-76.

Raymond, Joad. Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Reichardt, Sven. Authentizität und Gemeinschaft. Linksalternatives Leben in den siebziger und frühen achtziger Jahren. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014.

Schorn-Schütte, Luise. “Luther und die Politik”. In Martin Luther, edited by Alberto Melloni, 591-604.

Warner, Michael. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14, no. 1 (2002): 49-90.

Winock, Michel. Das Jahrhundert der Intellektuellen. Konstanz: UVK, 2000.

Wyman, Patrick. The Verge. Reformation, Renaissance, and Thirty Years that Shook the World. New York: Twelve Books, 2021 (Adobe Digital Editions).

Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture. Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton (N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Online Resources

Anonymized, online resource.

Rabe, L. “Ranking der beliebtesten Twitter-Profile aus Deutschland nach der Anzahl der Follower weltweit im Mai 2021,” Statista, May 26, 2021. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/70597/umfrage/twitter-accounts-nach-anzahl-follower/.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-08

How to Cite

Bebnowski, D. (2022). Writing in Privacy to Mass Publics: The Pamphleteer as an Activist Writer. Privacy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.7146/psj.vi.129999

Issue

Section

Research Articles