Kontroversiel relevans: Tal der virker, er tal der splitter

Forfattere

  • Hjalte Meilvang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i2.27651

Resumé

Statistics and indicators are key tools for the use of knowledge in policy, management and governance. In the so-called evaluation wave (Dahler-Larsen and Kristiansen 2015) and evidence-based-policy movement (Bhatti et al. 2006; Krogstrup 2011) numbers contribute ostensibly objective descriptions and the possibility of explicit comparison. However, indicators should not be regarded as unproblematic value-free knowledge – but must be seen as politically efficacious when we have ‘trust’ in them through their seemingly uncontroversial objectivity (Porter 1995). However, it is difficult for an indicator to be at the same time politically significant and uncontroversial. Numbers and statistics become relevant when they are used. But use increases the risk of controversy. Numbers that work, work in ways that will be contrary to some. Through an analysis of standardized testing in Danish schools, this article explores how the politics of numbers unfolds between relevance, where numbers become useful for management and governance – and the controversy this relevance causes.

Referencer

Alkin, M. C. and King, J. A. (2016). The Historical Development of Evaluation Use. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 37(4), pp. 658-579.
Andersen, A. S. (2016). Lærer undrede sig: "Inkommensurabel" fjernes fra danskprøve. [online], DR, Available at: http://www.dr.dk/nyheder/regionale/midtvest/laerer-undrede-sig-inkommensurabel-fjernes-fra-danskproeve [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
Andersen, V. N. (2007). Transparency and Openness: A Reform or Education Policy?. Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 30(1), pp. 38-60.
Andersen, V. N., Dahler-Larsen, P. and Pedersen, C. S. (2009). Quality assurance and evaluation in Denmark. Journal of Education Policy, vol. 24(2), pp. 135-147.
Asdal, K. (2011). The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 36(1), pp. 1-9.
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006). Whats measured is what matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Systems. Public Administration, vol. 84(3), pp. 517-538.
Bhatti, Y., Hansen, H. F. and Rieper, O. (2006). Evidensbevægelsens udvikling, organisering og arbejdsform: En kortlægningsrapport [online] København: AKF-Forlaget. Available at: http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/15320254/evidens.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Bjørnholt, B. & Krassel, K. F. (2016). Midtvejs i folkeskolereformen – en midtvejsmåling af den kommunale styring i forbindelse med folkeskolereformen [online] København: KORA. Available at:
https://www.kora.dk/udgivelser/udgivelse/i13592/ [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance, vol. 26(2), pp. 197-215.
Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5(3), pp. 12-23.
Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bundsgaard, J. and Puck, M. R. (2016). Nationale test : Danske lærere og skolelederes brug, holdninger og viden [online]. Aarhus: DPU, Aarhus Universitet og Center for Anvendt Skoleforskning, University College Lillebælt. Available at:
http://pure.au.dk//portal/files/102516329/Ebog_Nationale_test_FINAL_september_2016.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Børstin, M. And Fuglsang, J. (2010). Haarder og Løkke er i åben strid om skoletest. Politiken, [online]. Available at:
http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE889088/haarder-og-loekke-er-i-aaben-strid-om-skoletest/ [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
Carlsen, E. M. (2004). Ledende artikel: Derfor vinder Fogh. BT, section 1, p. 2.
Contandriopoulos, D., Lemire, M., Denis, J.-L. and Tremblay, É. (2010). Knowledge Exchange Processes in Organizations and Policy Arenas: A Narrative Systematic Review of the Literature. Milbank Quarterly, vol. 88(4), pp. 444-483.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2006). Evalueringskultur: et begreb bliver til. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). Når test skal testes. Unge Pædagoger, 2012(3), pp. 14-22.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2013), Evaluering af projekter: og andre ting, som ikke er ting. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Dahler-Larsen, P. and Kristiansen, M. B. (2015). Tema: Hvad kom der ud af evalueringsbølgen?. Økonomi & Politik, vol. 88(1)-
Deming, E. (2017). [online]. Goodreads.com. Available at:
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/310261.W_Edwards_Deming [Accessed 23 May. 2017].
DR, (2005). Den første partileder-debat. [online]. Available at:
http://www.dr.dk/nyheder/htm/baggrund/tema2005/fvvalg/381.htm. [Accessed 23 Jan. 2017].
Ekholm, M., Mortimore, P., David-Evans, M., Laukkanen, R. and Valijarvi, J. (2004). OECD-rapport om grundskolen i Danmark – 2004 (Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie, 5). København: Undervisningsministeriet.
Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 113(1), pp. 1-40.
Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24, pp. 313-343.
Folkeskolen, (2005). Koks i forligskredsen. [online]. Available at: https://www.folkeskolen.dk/39736/koks-i-forligskredsen. [Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
Folketinget. (2006a). Førstebehandling af L 101 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v). Folketinget.dk. Availbale at: http://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/l101/beh138/forhandling.htm?startItem=-1#alleindlaeg [Accessed 25 Jan. 2017].
Folketinget. (2006b). Førstebehandling af L 170 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (Præcisering af folkeskolens formål, ekstra timer i dansk og historie, elevplaner, offentliggørelse af landsresultater af test, præcisering af det kommunale ansvar samt etablering af nyt råd for evaluering og kvalitetsudvikling af folkeskolen). Folketinget.dk. Available at:
http://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/L170/BEH1-66/forhandling.htm#dok [Accessed14 Feb. 2017].
Folketinget. (2017). Førstebehandling af B 55 Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om at gøre de nationale test til frivillige redskaber i folkeskolen. Folketinget.dk. Available at: http://www.ft.dk/samling/20161/beslutningsforslag/B55/BEH1-58/forhandling.htm#dok [Accessed 14 Feb. 2917].
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA Effect in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, vol. 24(1), pp. 23-37.
Gustafsson, L. R. (2012). What Did You Learn in School Today?: How Ideas Mattered for Policy Changes in Danish and Swedish Schools 1990-2011. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.
Hellisen, H. (2014). Nu skal resultatstyringen være lov. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: http://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/L170/BEH166/forhandling.htm#dok. [Accesed 14 Feb. 2017].
Hermann, S. 2007. Magt og Oplysning - Folkeskolen 1950-2006. København: Unge Pædagoger.
Innes, J. E. (1990). Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators, 2. ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Karen, R. (2014). Folkeskolen tester opgaveudvikling: Lang vej fra tanke til test. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at:
http://www.folkeskolen.dk/545682/folkeskolen-tester-opgaveudvikling-lang-vej-fra-tanke-til-test. [Accessed 13 Feb. 2017].
Karen, R. (2016). Skoleprofessor: Problemer med nationale test er større, end jeg troede. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at:
http://www.folkeskolen.dk/583736/skoleprofessor-problemer-med-nationale-test-er-stoerre-end-jeg-troede [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
KL, DLF, DS, S&S, and BKF. (2004). Folkeskolens svar på OECD's anbefalinger - Tilbagemelding til undervisningsministeren fra KL, Danmarks Lærerforening, Lederforeningen, Danmarks Skolelederforening, Skole og Samfund, Børne- og Kulturchefforeningen [online]. Available at:
http://www.dlf.org/media/44138/folkeskolenssvarpaaoecd.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Kousholt, K. (2015). Vidensformers legitimitet i skolepraksis. Nordic Studies in Education, vol. 35(3/4), pp. 168-183.
Krejsler, J. B., Olsson, U. and Petersson, K. (2014). The transnational grip on Scandinavian education reforms - The open method of coordination challenging national policy-making. Nordic Studies in Education, vol. 34(3), pp. 172-186.
Krogstrup, H. K. (2011). Kampen om evidens: Resultatmåling, Effektevaluering og Evidens. København: Hans Reitzel.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ledermann, S. (2012). Exploring the Necessary Conditions for Evaluation Use in Program Change. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 33(2), pp. 159-178.
Lindeberg, T. (2015). Evaluering som politisk forsikring. Økonomi & Politik, vol. 88(1), pp. 23.
Maier, C. M. 17-9-2016, De nationale tests dumper i test [blog]. Folkeskolen.dk. Available at: https://www.folkeskolen.dk/593504/de-nationale-tests-dumper-i-test
[Accessed 26 Jan. 2017].
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83(2), pp. 340-363.
Nørby, E. T. (2016). Talepapir - Åbent samråd i BUU om de nationale test [online]. Folketinget.dk. Available at:
http://www.ft.dk/samling/20151/almdel/buu/bilag/122/1607817.pdf [Accessed 19 Nov. 2016].
Olsen, J. V. (2010). Lars Løkke: Det er slut med topstyring af folkeskolen. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: https://www.folkeskolen.dk/62803/lars-loekke-det-er-slut-med-topstyring-af-folkeskolen. [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
Olsen, J. V. (2010). Ugen, hvor statsministeren satte skolen på den anden ende. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: http://www.folkeskolen.dk/61169/ugen-hvor-statsministeren-satte-skolen-paa-den-anden-ende [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
Ordnet.dk (2017a). ’Relevans’. [online], Ordnet.dk. Available at:
http://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?query=relevans [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Ordnet.dk (2017b). ’Relevant’. [online], Ordnet.dk. Available at:
http://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?query=relevant [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Pors, J. G. (2009). Evaluering indefra: politisk ledelse af folkeskolens evalueringskultur. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Pors, J. G. (2016): The ghostly workings of Danish accountability policies. Journal of Education Policy, vol. 31(4), pp. 466-481.
Porter, T. (1994). Making Things Quantitative. Science in Context, vol. 7(3), pp. 389-407.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rambøll. (2013). Evaluering af de nationale test i folkeskolen [online]. København: Rambøll Management. Availabel at: http://www.ramboll.dk/medier/rdk/ramboll-evaluerer-nationale-test [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Ravn, K. (2008). Test med mange formål. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: https://www.folkeskolen.dk/51098/test-med-mange-formaal. [Accessed 25 Jan. 2017].
Ravn, K. (2010). De nationale test – hvordan er de?. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: https://www.folkeskolen.dk/61344/de-nationale-test--hvordan-er-de. [Accessed 25 Jan. 2017].
Ravn, Karen. (2016). Nu ved politikerne, at de nationale test ikke måler præcist. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: http://www.folkeskolen.dk/593625/nu-ved-politikerne-at-de-nationale-test-ikke-maaler-praecist. [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016].
Riise, A. B. (2016). S-profil: Giv gode kommuner fem års pause fra nationale test. [online], Folkeskolen. Available at: http://www.folkeskolen.dk/592251/s-profil-giv-gode-kommuner-fem-aars-pause-fra-nationale-test [Accessed 20 Oct. 2016].
Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 18(2-3), pp. 277-310.
Undervisningsministeriet. (2011). Brug testresutlaterne - Inspiration til pædagogisk brug af restultater fra de nationale test. København: Styrelsen for Evaluering og Kvalitetsudvikling af Folkeskolen (Skolestyrelsen) .
Undervisningsministeriet. (2016). Opgaveproduktion og kvalitetssikring af opgaver til de nationale test [online]. København: Ministeriet for Børn, Undervisning og ligestilling (Styrelsen for Undervisning og Kvalitet). Available at:
http://www.uvm.dk/Aktuelt/~/UVM-DK/Content/News/Udd/Folke/2016/Sep/160912-Faktanotater-om-opgaveproduktion-og-statistisk-sikkerhed-i-de-nationale-test [Accessed 23 May 2017].
Van Dooren, W. (2009). A Politico-administrative Agenda for Progress in Social Measurement: Reforming the Calculation of Government's Contribution to GDP. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, vol. 11(3), pp. 309-326.
Van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 25(3), pp. 267-281.
Weiss, C. H. (1979). The Many Meanings of Research Utilization. Public Administration Review, vol. 39(5), pp. 426-431.
Weiss, C. H. and Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Truth Tests and Utility Tests: Decision-Makers' Frames of Reference for Social Science Research. American Sociological Review, vol. 45(2), pp. 302-313.
Willems, T. and van Dooren, W. (2012). Coming to Terms with Accountability. Public Management Review, vol. 14(7), pp. 1011-1036.
Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 31(6), pp. 579-600.

Downloads

Publiceret

2017-06-01

Citation/Eksport

Meilvang, H. (2017). Kontroversiel relevans: Tal der virker, er tal der splitter. Politik, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i2.27651