Slagmarkens moral og risikofri krig med droner

Forfattere

  • Anders Henriksen
  • Jens Ringsmose

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i1.27641

Resumé

The article examines the instinctive uneasiness many feel about the use of armed drones. Why is it, we ask, that so many people – including members of the armed forces – acknowledge that armed drones offer an expedient and legally defensible solution to pressing security challenges and yet feel uncomfortable about them? The main argument of the article is that much of the criticism of drone warfare is associated with an underlying ethically conditioned discomfort with so-called ‘riskless warfare.’ The very feature that makes drones so attractive to policy-makers and military commanders – their risk free deployment – is, paradoxically, also one of the primary causes why many feel fundamentally uncomfortable with them. To make this argument, we build on the works of Martin van Creveld and Paul W. Kahn. 

Referencer

Clausewitz, C von 1976 [1832], On War, M. Howard & P. Paret (red.), Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press.

Coker, C 2002, Waging War Without Warriors? The Changing Culture of Military Conflict. London, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Creveld, M van 1991, The Transformation of War, New York, The Free Press.

Elbe, J von 1939, ‘The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law’, American Journal of International Law, vol. 33, pp. 669-70.

Emmerson, B ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism’, A/HR/C/25/59, 28. februar 2014.

Kaag, J & Kreps, S 2014, Drone Warfare, Cambridge, Policy Press.
Killmister, S 2008, ‘Remote Weaponry: The Ethical Implications’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121-133.

Kilcullen, D & Exum, A 2009 ‘Death from Above, Outrage from Below’, New York Times, 16. maj 2009.

Margalit, A & Walzer, M 2009, ‘Israel: Civilians and Combatants,’ The New York Review of Books, 14. maj 2009.

McMahan, J 2004, ‘The Ethics of Killing in War’, Ethics, vol. 114, pp. 693-733. McMahan, J 2009, Killing in War, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

McMahan, J 2013, ‘Foreword’, in B J Strawser (red.), Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mujamdar, D 2016, ‘Is the US Army Ready for a Shocking Technological Revolution in Land Warfare?’, The National Interest, June 23rd. Available at:http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-us-army-ready-shocking-
technological-revolution-land-16703.

Kahn P 2002, ‘The Paradox of Riskless Warfare’, Philosophy & Public Policy
Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 2-8.

Stanford University & New York University (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Available at: http://livingunderdrones.org/.

Steinhof, U 2014, ‘Killing Them Safely: Extreme Asymmetry and Its Discontents’ in B J Strawser (red.) 2010, ‘Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles’, Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 342-368.

Strawser, B J 2013a, (red.) Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Strawser, B J 2013b, ‘Introduction: The Moral Landscape of Unmanned Weapons’ in Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, B J Strawser (red.), Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Walzer, M 2004, Arguing about War, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.

Downloads

Publiceret

2017-03-01

Citation/Eksport

Henriksen, A., & Ringsmose, J. (2017). Slagmarkens moral og risikofri krig med droner. Politik, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i1.27641