Slagmarkens moral og risikofri krig med droner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i1.27641Resumé
The article examines the instinctive uneasiness many feel about the use of armed drones. Why is it, we ask, that so many people – including members of the armed forces – acknowledge that armed drones offer an expedient and legally defensible solution to pressing security challenges and yet feel uncomfortable about them? The main argument of the article is that much of the criticism of drone warfare is associated with an underlying ethically conditioned discomfort with so-called ‘riskless warfare.’ The very feature that makes drones so attractive to policy-makers and military commanders – their risk free deployment – is, paradoxically, also one of the primary causes why many feel fundamentally uncomfortable with them. To make this argument, we build on the works of Martin van Creveld and Paul W. Kahn.
Referencer
Coker, C 2002, Waging War Without Warriors? The Changing Culture of Military Conflict. London, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Creveld, M van 1991, The Transformation of War, New York, The Free Press.
Elbe, J von 1939, ‘The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law’, American Journal of International Law, vol. 33, pp. 669-70.
Emmerson, B ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism’, A/HR/C/25/59, 28. februar 2014.
Kaag, J & Kreps, S 2014, Drone Warfare, Cambridge, Policy Press.
Killmister, S 2008, ‘Remote Weaponry: The Ethical Implications’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121-133.
Kilcullen, D & Exum, A 2009 ‘Death from Above, Outrage from Below’, New York Times, 16. maj 2009.
Margalit, A & Walzer, M 2009, ‘Israel: Civilians and Combatants,’ The New York Review of Books, 14. maj 2009.
McMahan, J 2004, ‘The Ethics of Killing in War’, Ethics, vol. 114, pp. 693-733. McMahan, J 2009, Killing in War, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
McMahan, J 2013, ‘Foreword’, in B J Strawser (red.), Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mujamdar, D 2016, ‘Is the US Army Ready for a Shocking Technological Revolution in Land Warfare?’, The National Interest, June 23rd. Available at:http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-us-army-ready-shocking-
technological-revolution-land-16703.
Kahn P 2002, ‘The Paradox of Riskless Warfare’, Philosophy & Public Policy
Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 2-8.
Stanford University & New York University (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Available at: http://livingunderdrones.org/.
Steinhof, U 2014, ‘Killing Them Safely: Extreme Asymmetry and Its Discontents’ in B J Strawser (red.) 2010, ‘Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles’, Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 342-368.
Strawser, B J 2013a, (red.) Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Strawser, B J 2013b, ‘Introduction: The Moral Landscape of Unmanned Weapons’ in Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of Unmanned Military, B J Strawser (red.), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Walzer, M 2004, Arguing about War, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).